A sensitivity analysis approach of multi-attribute decision making technique to rank flood mitigation projects

The goal of this study is to evaluate and rank the effectiveness of the Korean governments’ Four Major River Restoration Projects. A hydraulic simulation model and geographic information system tools are used to analyze the flood mitigation effects provided by these projects. In addition, the rankings of four major rivers are derived using two sensitivity analyses to weight values and performance measures for Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) technique. As a result, the flood risk presented by the Nakdong River can be most effectively decreased when considering these weights, and levee freeboards are the most critical criterion in the effectiveness ranking. The Youngsan River’s flow capacity criterion is also critical for this problem. This study will be helpful in the robust prioritization of various water resources plans.

[1]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria approach to flood risk vulnerability in South Korea by considering climate change impacts , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  E. Triantaphyllou,et al.  A Sensitivity Analysis Approach for Some Deterministic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods* , 1997 .

[3]  E. Chung,et al.  Prioritization of water management under climate change and urbanization using multi-criteria decision making methods , 2011 .

[4]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  Development of spatial water resources vulnerability index considering climate change impacts. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Willy Bauwens,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty using robustness analysis in the application of ORESTE to sewer rehabilitation projects prioritization—Brussels case study , 2009 .

[6]  T. Masuda Hierarchical sensitivity analysis of priority used in analytic hierarchy process , 1990 .

[7]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  Identification of Spatial Ranking of Hydrological Vulnerability Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques: Case Study of Korea , 2009 .

[8]  Yeou-Koung Tung,et al.  Decision Rules for Water Resources Management under Uncertainty , 2009 .

[9]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Distance-based and stochastic uncertainty analysis for multi-criteria decision analysis in Excel using Visual Basic for Applications , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  Prioritization of water management for sustainability using hydrologic simulation model and multicriteria decision making techniques. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  E. Chung Application of Multi-criteria Decision Making Techniques for Water Resources Planning: 2. Sensitivity Analysis of Weighting and Performance Values , 2012 .

[12]  K. M. Hyde,et al.  A distance-based uncertainty analysis approach to multi-criteria decision analysis for water resource decision making. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  Jianhua Wu,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of TOPSIS method in water quality assessment: I. Sensitivity to the parameter weights , 2013, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[14]  Steven J. Burian,et al.  Integrated Use of a Continuous Simulation Model and Multi-Attribute Decision-Making for Ranking Urban Watershed Management Alternatives , 2011 .

[15]  Steven J. Burian,et al.  Incorporating uncertainty and objective load reduction allocation into the Total Maximum Daily Load process in Korea , 2011 .

[16]  Eric R. Zieyel Operations research : applications and algorithms , 1988 .