Misperception Model-Based Analytic Method of Visual Interface Design Factors

The unreasonable design of interface information has given rise to malfunctions of cognition and decision-making among operators, thus leading users into a complex cognition and finally resulting in serious failures in information recognition and analysis, and even in operation and execution processes, which poses one of the major causes for many accidents. Firstly, there remains an internal relevance between errors and perception, and five error factors i.e., visual confined, visual interference, visual illusion, attention shift and over attention were extracted from the point of visual attention mechanism; Secondly, the cognitive model theory and psychological experimental paradigm corresponding to the cognitive level were combed out through explanation of the error level, thus the misperception model was established; Finally, It provides a feasible basis for design improvement of visual interface through behavior and physiological experimental data. This misperception analysis method of visual interface has applied mature psychological experimental paradigm and can favorably analyze the design factors from the aspect of misperception, so as to play a significant role in improving the visual interface design.

[1]  Marc Pomplun,et al.  Guidance of eye movements during conjunctive visual search: the distractor-ratio effect. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[2]  D. Norman Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[3]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  Patrick Monnier Redundant coding assessed in a visual search task , 2003 .

[5]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Modeling icon search in ACT-R/PM , 2002, Cognitive Systems Research.

[6]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  J. Theeuwes Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  U. Neisser Cognition and reality: principles and implications , 1976 .

[9]  J. Forgas Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition , 2001 .

[10]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The human visual cortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  J. Reason Human error: models and management , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Jean Underwood,et al.  Visual attention while driving: sequences of eye fixations made by experienced and novice drivers , 2003, Ergonomics.

[13]  K. Schweizer,et al.  Visual Search, Reaction Time, and Cognitive Ability , 1998, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  Alistair Sutcliffe,et al.  Human-Computer Interface Design , 1988, Macmillan Computer Science Series.

[15]  J. diVita,et al.  A Redundant Use of Luminance and Flashing with Shape and Color as Highlighting Codes ,in Symbolic Displays , 2022 .

[16]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Modeling the Visual Search of Displays: A Revised ACT-R Model of Icon Search Based on Eye-Tracking Data , 2006, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Computations in the early visual cortex , 2003, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[18]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Proximity Compatibility and Information Display: Effects of Color, Space, and Objectness on Information Integration , 1990 .

[19]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  The Role of Affect in Attitude Change , 2000 .

[21]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.