Compliance-Guided Therapy

Background and objectiveIn the field of drug noncompliance, we investigated an original approach that could give the prescribing physician, in collaboration with a clinical pharmacologist, an active role. The aim here is for the prescribing physician to take compliance into account so as to provide an optimised prescription (choice of molecule prescribed and its rhythm of administration) adapted to each patient. The example considered is that of oral anticoagulant treatment prescribed long-term.MethodsIn order to investigate the choice of the best molecule and treatment regimen for a given noncompliance pattern, we performed an in silico study with two oral anticoagulant agents, warfarin and acenocoumarol, each taken in one or two daily doses. Three linked models were used: the first model generated specific noncompliance patterns, the second model described the pharmacokinetics of oral anticoagulant agents and the third model summarised the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relations.ResultsConsidering different patterns of noncompliance (including timing errors in drug intake and the phenomenon of drug holidays) and comparing warfarin with acenocoumarol, we identified different situations in which one agent (prescribed once or twice daily) could clearly minimise both the thromboembolic and haemorrhagic risks. However, for some specific noncompliance patterns, the choice of the optimal therapy should also be guided by the basal individual thromboembolic and haemorrhagic risks.ConclusionIndividualisation of drug therapy involves both drug dose and drug choice. In addition to the classical approach (i.e. drug level measurements, enzyme assays and even genetic sequence data), our study suggests that compliance-guided therapy may represent a potential, evolving way for the individualisation of prescriptions.

[1]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Compliance in Health Care , 1979 .

[2]  G. Levy,et al.  Kinetics of pharmacologic effects in man: The anticoagulant action of warfarin , 1969, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[3]  M. Burnier,et al.  Electronic compliance monitoring in resistant hypertension: the basis for rational therapeutic decisions , 2001, Journal of hypertension.

[4]  Donald Martin,et al.  Risk Factors for Complications of Chronic Anticoagulation: A Multicenter Study , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  J Urquhart,et al.  The Electronic Medication Event Monitor , 1997, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[6]  N. Holford Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Warfarin , 1986, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[7]  J. Boissel,et al.  Revisiting the effect compartment through timing errors in drug administration. , 1998, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[8]  Palle Petersen,et al.  PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMISED TRIAL OF WARFARIN AND ASPIRIN FOR PREVENTION OF THROMBOEMBOLIC COMPLICATIONS IN CHRONIC ATRIAL FIBRILLATION The Copenhagen AFASAK Study , 1989, The Lancet.

[9]  S. Pauker,et al.  Effect of laboratory variation in the prothrombin-time ratio on the results of oral anticoagulant therapy. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  W. Kruse,et al.  Dynamics of drug regimen compliance — its assessment by microprocessor-based monitoring , 2004, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[11]  J. Hirsh,et al.  Oral anticoagulants: mechanism of action, clinical effectiveness, and optimal therapeutic range. , 2001, Chest.

[12]  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variations of acenocoumarol orally administrated either once or twice daily in patients with deep venous thrombosis , 1998, Fundamental & clinical pharmacology.

[13]  J Urquhart,et al.  Patient non-compliance with drug regimens: measurement, clinical correlates, economic impact. , 1996, European heart journal.

[14]  P. Kowey,et al.  Atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation, and stroke. , 1996, American Journal of Cardiology.

[15]  S M Nazarian,et al.  Warfarin in the prevention of stroke associated with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Veterans Affairs Stroke Prevention in Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  S. Laporte,et al.  Compliance and stability of INR of two oral anticoagulants with different half-lives: a randomised trial , 2003, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[17]  David C. Anderson,et al.  Bleeding during antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[18]  Leandro Provinciali,et al.  Secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke , 1993 .

[19]  Marcus M Reidenberg,et al.  Evolving ways that drug therapy is individualized , 2003, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[20]  M Gent,et al.  How should results from completed studies influence ongoing clinical trials? The CAFA Study experience. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[21]  D. Heijde,et al.  Development of a questionnaire to investigate patient compliance with antirheumatic drug therapy. , 1999 .

[22]  John Urquhart,et al.  Role of Patient Compliance in Clinical Pharmacokinetics , 1994 .

[23]  M. Averbuch,et al.  COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT IN CLINICAL TRIALS : THE MEMS DEVICE , 1990 .

[24]  J. Vandenbroucke,et al.  The role of compliance as a cause of instability in oral anticoagulant therapy , 1997, British journal of haematology.

[25]  J. Vandenbroucke,et al.  Bleeding complications in oral anticoagulant therapy. An analysis of risk factors. , 1993, Archives of internal medicine.

[26]  L B Sheiner,et al.  A Markov mixed effect regression model for drug compliance. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[27]  S. Kumar,et al.  Poor Compliance Is a Major Factor in Unstable Outpatient Control of Anticoagulant Therapy , 1989, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[28]  R A O'REILLY,et al.  STUDIES ON THE COUMARIN ANTICOAGULANT DRUGS: THE PHARMACODYNAMICS OF WARFARIN IN MAN. , 1963, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[29]  Johan Gabrielsson,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data Analysis: Concepts and Applications , 2002 .

[30]  D. Katzenstein,et al.  Characterizing patterns of drug‐taking behavior with a multiple drug regimen in an AIDS clinical trial , 1998, AIDS.

[31]  O. Benavente,et al.  Antithrombotic Therapy To Prevent Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[32]  B. Plaud,et al.  Population pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic analysis of fluindione in patients , 1998, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[33]  M Gent,et al.  Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Anticoagulation (CAFA) Study. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  M. Burnier,et al.  Why Objective Monitoring of Compliance is Important in the Management of Hypertension. , 2000, The Journal of Clinical Hypertension.

[35]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study: Final Results , 1991, Circulation.

[36]  R. Spector Optimizing drug therapy , 2004, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[37]  Varun Garg,et al.  Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses , 1993, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[38]  J. Kastrup,et al.  Risk factors for thromboembolic complications in chronic atrial fibrillation. The Copenhagen AFASAK study. , 1990 .