Adaptation modulates the electrophysiological substrates of perceived facial distortion: Support for opponent coding

In two experiments we determined the electrophysiological substrates of figural aftereffects in face adaptation using compressed and expanded faces. In Experiment 1, subjects viewed a series of compressed and expanded faces. Results demonstrated that distortion systematically modulated the peak amplitude of the P250 event-related potential (ERP) component. As the amount of perceived distortion in a face increased, the peak amplitude of the P250 component decreased, regardless of whether the physical distortion was compressive or expansive. This provided an ERP metric of the degree of perceived distortion. In Experiment 2, we examined the effects of adaptation on the P250 amplitude by introducing an adapting stimulus that affected the subject’s perception of the distorted test faces as measured through normality judgments. The set of test faces was held constant and the adapting stimulus was systematically varied across experimental days. Adapting to a compressed face made a less compressed test face appear more normal and an expanded test face more distorted as measured by normality ratings. We found that the adaptation conditions that increased the perceived distortion of the distorted test faces also decreased the amplitude of the P250. Likewise, adaptation conditions that decreased the perceived distortion of the distorted test faces also increased the amplitude of the P250. The results demonstrate that perceptual adaptation to compressed or expanded faces affected not only the behavioral normality judgments but also the electrophysiological correlates of face processing in the window of 190–260 ms after stimulus onset. Adaptation techniques can be used to isolate neurophysiologcal mechanisms that are responsible for representing a stimulus. hrough extended exposure, the adaptation procedure recalibrates he encoding mechanisms that respond in the presence of an adaptng stimulus, resulting in systematic distortions of the perceptions f related stimuli, known as aftereffects. Adaptation aftereffects an alter the perception of subsequent stimuli in multiple ways. or example, adaptation to a distorted image can make a similarly istorted image appear more undistorted, while adaptation to the ame distorted image can make an image distorted in an opposite Please cite this article in press as: Burkhardt, A., et al. Adaptation modula Support for opponent coding. Neuropsychologia (2010), doi:10.1016/j.neur irection appear more distorted. Aftereffects based on the percepion of an object’s shape are termed figural aftereffects (Gibson, 933; Köhler & Wallach, 1944). An illustrative example of these patterns can be found in studies f faces, where the use of adaptation procedures has proven useful ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 812 855 1554; fax: +1 812 855 4691. E-mail address: lblaha@indiana.edu (L.M. Blaha). 028-3932/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. oi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.016 © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. to explore both the mechanisms for encoding face information and the temporal organization of those mechanisms. For example, Webster and MacLin (1999) demonstrated that perceptual adaptation to a compressed or expanded face caused a test face to appear distorted in the direction opposite to the adapting face. They showed that if one were to adapt to an expanded face, a normal test face would appear more compressed and an expanded face would appear more normal. Webster and MacLin (1999) termed this pattern of findings the face figural aftereffect, because it was based on the distortion of spatial or figural information within the adapting and test faces. Similar results have been found for identity aftereffects (Leopold, O’Toole, Vetter, & Blanz, 2001) in which adaptation to a particular identity alters the perceived identities of other faces. Strong aftereffects also occur following adaptation to face sex, race, and emotion (Webster, Kaping, Mizokami, & tes the electrophysiological substrates of perceived facial distortion: opsychologia.2010.08.016 Duhamel, 2004). These face aftereffects conform to the idea of norm-based encoding, where stimuli are encoded as a deviation from their psychological norm (Rhodes, Jeffery, Watson, Clifford, & Nakayama, 2003; Rhodes & Leopold, 2009; Valentine, 1991; Valentine & Bruce, 1986). Adaptation results in a temporary shift

[1]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. , 1933 .

[2]  H. Wallach,et al.  Figural aftereffects; an investigation of visual processes. , 1944 .

[3]  P. Lennie,et al.  Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones , 1979, Nature.

[4]  S. Petersen,et al.  Direction-specific adaptation in area MT of the owl monkey , 1985, Brain Research.

[5]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Effects of Distinctiveness in Recognising and Classifying Faces , 1986, Perception.

[6]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[7]  D. Regan,et al.  Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size , 1992, Vision Research.

[8]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  M. Carandini,et al.  A tonic hyperpolarization underlying contrast adaptation in cat visual cortex. , 1997, Science.

[10]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[11]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Modulation of event‐related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[13]  M. Sur,et al.  Adaptation-Induced Plasticity of Orientation Tuning in Adult Visual Cortex , 2000, Neuron.

[14]  L. Deouell,et al.  STRUCTURAL ENCODING AND IDENTIFICATION IN FACE PROCESSING: ERP EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE MECHANISMS , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[15]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  C. Chubb,et al.  The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect , 2001, Vision Research.

[17]  I. Gauthier,et al.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[18]  M. Webster,et al.  Adaptation to natural facial categories , 2002 .

[19]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  Analyzing PCA-based Face Recognition Algorithms: Eigenvector Selection and Distance Measures , 2003 .

[20]  B. Milivojevic,et al.  Turn that frown upside down: ERP effects of thatcherization of misorientated faces. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[21]  K. Nakayama,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article FITTING THE MIND TO THE WORLD: Face Adaptation and Attractiveness Aftereffects , 2022 .

[22]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  G. Kovács,et al.  Position-specificity of facial adaptation , 2005, Neuroreport.

[25]  Sheng He,et al.  Viewer-Centered Object Representation in the Human Visual System Revealed by Viewpoint Aftereffects , 2005, Neuron.

[26]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Stimulus selectivity of figural aftereffects for faces. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Éva M. Bankó,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity , 2006, Vision Research.

[30]  G. Boynton,et al.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[31]  G. Kovács,et al.  Adaptation duration affects the spatial selectivity of facial aftereffects , 2007, Vision Research.

[32]  R. Jenkins,et al.  Are you looking at me? Neural correlates of gaze adaptation , 2007, Neuroreport.

[33]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: adapter position effects and neural models. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Position-specific and position-invariant face aftereffects reflect the adaptation of different cortical areas , 2008, NeuroImage.

[36]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Expertise and own-race bias in face processing: an event-related potential study , 2008, Neuroreport.

[37]  Wesley T. Kerr,et al.  Distinguishing conjoint and independent neural tuning for stimulus features with fMRI adaptation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  E. McKone,et al.  What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation , 2010, Vision Research.

[39]  A. Harris,et al.  Temporally distinct neural coding of perceptual similarity and prototype bias. , 2010, Journal of vision.