Comparing projections of industrial energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions in long-term energy models

Abstract The industry sector is a major energy consumer and GHG emitter. Effective climate change mitigation strategies will require a significant reduction of industrial emissions. To better understand the variations in the projected industrial pathways for both baseline and mitigation scenarios, we compare key input and structure assumptions used in energy-models in relation to the modeled sectors' mitigation potential. It is shown that although all models show in the short term similar trends in a baseline scenario, where industrial energy demand increases steadily, after 2050 energy demand spans a wide range across the models (between 203 and 451 EJ/yr). In Non-OECD countries, the sectors energy intensity is projected to decline relatively rapidly but in the 2010–2050 period this is offset by economic growth. The ability to switch to alternative fuels to mitigate GHG emissions differs across models with technologically detailed models being less flexible in switching from fossil fuels to electricity. This highlights the importance of understanding economy-wide mitigation responses and costs and is therefore an area for improvements. By looking at the cement sector in more detail, we show that analyzing each industrial sub-sector separately can improve the interpretation and accuracy of outcomes, and provide insights in the feasibility of GHG abatement.

[1]  Tom Kober,et al.  A CROSS-MODEL COMPARISON OF GLOBAL LONG-TERM TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION UNDER A 2°C CLIMATE CHANGE CONTROL TARGET , 2013 .

[2]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Climate impact of transportation A model comparison , 2013, Climatic Change.

[3]  John P. Weyant,et al.  Energy efficiency potentials for global climate change mitigation , 2014, Climatic Change.

[4]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Energy efficiency improvement potentials and a low energy demand scenario for the global industrial sector , 2014 .

[5]  Nan Li,et al.  Projection of Cement Demand and Analysis of the Impacts of Carbon Tax on Cement Industry in China , 2015 .

[6]  John P. Weyant,et al.  The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies , 2014, Climatic Change.

[7]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Synergy of air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions of Chinese industries: A critical assessment of energy models , 2015 .

[8]  Lynn Price,et al.  Potential Energy Savings and CO2 Emissions Reduction of China's Cement Industry , 2012 .

[9]  E. Worrell,et al.  Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for Cement Making. An ENERGY STAR Guide for Energy and Plant Managers , 2008 .

[10]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: Results from the Asia modeling exercise , 2012 .

[11]  Aie,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2013 , 2013 .

[12]  L. Clarke,et al.  Assessing Transformation Pathways , 2014 .

[13]  Edeltraud Guenther,et al.  THE ECONOMICS OF MITIGATING CLIMATE CHANGE: WHAT CAN WE KNOW? , 2015, Tạp chí Nghiên cứu dân tộc.

[14]  T. Gutowski,et al.  Material efficiency: A white paper , 2011 .

[15]  B. Zwaan,et al.  LIMITS Special Issue on Durban Platform scenarios A multi-model analysis of the regional and sectoral roles of bioenergy in near- and long-term CO2 emissions reduction , 2013 .

[16]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  A short note on integrated assessment modeling approaches: Rejoinder to the review of "Making or breaking climate targets - The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy" , 2015 .

[17]  J. Sathaye,et al.  Bottom-up Representation of Industrial Energy Efficiency Technologies in Integrated Assessment Models for the Cement Sector , 2011 .

[18]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Factors shaping aggregate energy intensity trend for industry: Energy intensity versus product mix , 2007 .

[19]  Andreas Löschel,et al.  Technological Change in Economic Models of Environmental Policy: A Survey , 2002 .