What shapes Eurasian lynx distribution in human dominated landscapes: selecting prey or avoiding people?

In the multi-use landscape of southern Norway, the distribution of lynx is likely to be determined both by the abundance of their favoured prey the roe deer and the risk associated with the presence of humans because most lynx mortalities are caused by humans (recreational harvest, poaching, vehicle collisions). We described the distribution of the reproductive portion of the lynx population based on snow-track observations of females with dependent kittens collected over 10 yr (19972006) in southern Norway. We used the ecological-niche factor analysis to examine how lynx distribution was influenced by roe deer, human activity, habitat type, environmental productivity and elevation. Our first prediction that lynx should be found in areas of relatively high roe deer abundance was supported. However, our second prediction that lynx should avoid human activity was rejected, and lynx instead occupied areas more disturbed in average than those available (with the exception of the most densely occupied areas). Lynx, however, avoided the most disturbed areas and our third prediction of a trade-off between abundance of prey and avoidance of human activity was supported. On the one hand, roe deer in the most disturbed areas benefit to a large extent from current human land use practices, potentially allowing them to escape predation from lynx. On the other hand, the situation is not so favourable for the predators who are restricted in competition refuges with medium to low prey densities. The consequence is that lynx conservation will have to be achieved in a human modifed environment where the potential for a range of conflicts and high human-caused mortality will remain a constant threat.

[1]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[2]  R. May,et al.  Habitat differentiation within the large-carnivore community of Norway's multiple-use landscapes , 2008, The Journal of applied ecology.

[3]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Assessing habitat selection using multivariate statistics: Some refinements of the ecological-niche factor analysis , 2008 .

[4]  J. V. Ver Hoef,et al.  Quasi-Poisson vs. negative binomial regression: how should we model overdispersed count data? , 2007, Ecology.

[5]  I. Herfindal,et al.  An evaluation of structured snow-track surveys to monitor Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx populations , 2007 .

[6]  O. Liberg,et al.  Distance rules for minimum counts of Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx family groups under different ecological conditions , 2007 .

[7]  K. Schmidt,et al.  Environmental correlates of Eurasian lynx occurrence in Poland – Large scale census and GIS mapping , 2006 .

[8]  N. Bunnefeld,et al.  Risk taking by Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in a human‐dominated landscape: effects of sex and reproductive status , 2006 .

[9]  Clément Calenge,et al.  The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals , 2006 .

[10]  R. Andersen,et al.  Diet of Eurasian lynx, Lynx lynx, in the boreal forest of southeastern Norway: the relative importance of livestock and hares at low roe deer density , 2006, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[11]  Stein Rune Karlsen,et al.  Satellite‐based mapping of the growing season and bioclimatic zones in Fennoscandia , 2006 .

[12]  O. Liberg,et al.  Survival rates and causes of mortality in Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in multi-use landscapes , 2006 .

[13]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Modelling distribution and abundance with presence‐only data , 2006 .

[14]  R. Bergström,et al.  Large Herbivore Ecology, Ecosystem Dynamics and Conservation , 2006 .

[15]  E. Solberg,et al.  Large Herbivore Ecology, Ecosystem Dynamics and Conservation: The future role of large carnivores in terrestrial trophic interactions: the northern temperate view , 2006 .

[16]  Edwin W. Pak,et al.  An extended AVHRR 8‐km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data , 2005 .

[17]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  S. Engen,et al.  CLIMATE CAUSES LARGE-SCALE SPATIAL SYNCHRONY IN POPULATION FLUCTUATIONS OF A TEMPERATE HERBIVORE , 2005 .

[19]  J. Estes,et al.  Strongly Interacting Species: Conservation Policy, Management, and Ethics , 2005 .

[20]  Erlend B. Nilsen,et al.  Prey density, environmental productivity and home-range size in the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) , 2005 .

[21]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Life cycle period and activity of prey influence their susceptibility to predators , 2004 .

[22]  L. Boitani,et al.  The Linkage between Conservation Strategies for Large Carnivores and Biodiversity: The View From the “Half-Full” Forests of Europe , 2004 .

[23]  D. Chessel,et al.  ECOLOGICAL-NICHE FACTOR ANALYSIS: HOW TO COMPUTE HABITAT-SUITABILITY MAPS WITHOUT ABSENCE DATA? , 2002 .

[24]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Assessing the suitability of central European landscapes for the reintroduction of Eurasian lynx , 2002 .

[25]  J. Michael Scott,et al.  Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale , 2002 .

[26]  I. Herfindal,et al.  Lynx depredation on domestic sheep in Norway , 2002 .

[27]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Modern applied statistics with S, 4th Edition , 2002, Statistics and computing.

[28]  J. Swenson,et al.  Predators and people: conservation of large carnivores is possible at high human densities if management policy is favourable , 2001 .

[29]  Miguel Delibes,et al.  Effects of an Attractive Sink Leading into Maladaptive Habitat Selection , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[30]  O. Liberg,et al.  Home Range Size and Choice of Management Strategy for Lynx in Scandinavia , 2001, Environmental management.

[31]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[32]  S. Durant,et al.  Living with the enemy: avoidance of hyenas and lions by cheetahs in the Serengeti , 2000 .

[33]  R. Woodroffe Predators and people: using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores , 2000 .

[34]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Temporal Variation in Danger Drives Antipredator Behavior: The Predation Risk Allocation Hypothesis , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[35]  A. Mysterud Seasonal migration pattern and home range of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in an altitudinal gradient in southern Norway , 1999 .

[36]  P. Sunde,et al.  Tolerance to humans of resting lynxes Lynx lynx in a hunted population , 1998, Wildlife Biology.

[37]  S. Durant Competition refuges and coexistence : an example from Serengeti carnivores , 1998 .

[38]  U. Breitenmoser Large predators in the Alps: The fall and rise of man's competitors , 1998 .

[39]  Jesslyn F. Brown,et al.  Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery , 1994 .

[40]  Donald A. Jackson STOPPING RULES IN PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS: A COMPARISON OF HEURISTICAL AND STATISTICAL APPROACHES' , 1993 .

[41]  Frank R. Bernhart,et al.  Spatial organization and recruitment of lynx (Lynx lynx) in a re‐introduced population in the Swiss Jura Mountains , 1993 .

[42]  A. Houston,et al.  General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation , 1993 .