Performance analysis of photovoltaic systems of two different technologies in a coastal desert climate zone of Chile

Abstract This paper reports on the performance of photovoltaic systems in the coastal zone of Antofagasta, northern Chile. This region is one of the most suitable places in the world for the use of solar energy due to the high solar radiation levels. However, this location is influenced by a coastal desert climate where the environmental effects on solar technologies are not well known. Therefore, we study the performance ratio of photovoltaic systems in a period of 16 months, in which solar radiation and ambient temperature were quantified. The technologies were modules based on amorphous/microcrystalline silicon tandem thin films and mono crystalline silicon solar cells. The global tilted solar irradiation reached mean values of 8.5 kW h/m 2  day in summer and 6 kW h/m 2  day in winter demonstrating the high radiation available here. We analyzed how the performance ratio is influenced by the dust accumulation and the ambient temperature associated to this place. It came out that the difference of energy yield between the technologies became larger for summer and smaller for winter, and that the performance ratio decreased due to the dust accumulation between −0.04%/day up to −0.13%/day for positive ambient temperature gradient, and between −0.13%/day up to −0.18%/day for negative ambient temperature gradient.

[1]  Manoj Kumar,et al.  Performance analysis and comparison of two silicon material based photovoltaic technologies under actual climatic conditions in Western India , 2014 .

[2]  A. Carr,et al.  A comparison of the performance of different PV module types in temperate climates , 2004 .

[3]  Arun Kumar,et al.  Performance assessment of different solar photovoltaic technologies under similar outdoor conditions , 2013 .

[4]  Masakatsu Ikisawa,et al.  Outdoor exposure tests of photovoltaic modules in Japan and overseas , 1998 .

[5]  Clifford W. Hansen,et al.  Weather-Corrected Performance Ratio , 2013 .

[6]  A. al-Ḥasan.  A new correlation for direct beam solar radiation received by photovoltaic panel with sand dust accumulated on its surface , 1998 .

[7]  L. Narvarte,et al.  Performance Analysis of 10,000 Residential PV Systems in France and Belgium , 2011 .

[8]  J. Carretero,et al.  Energy performance of different photovoltaic module technologies under outdoor conditions , 2014 .

[9]  A. Sayyah,et al.  Energy yield loss caused by dust deposition on photovoltaic panels , 2014 .

[10]  Syed A.M. Said,et al.  Fundamental studies on dust fouling effects on PV module performance , 2014 .

[11]  Llanos Mora-López,et al.  A new model to predict the energy generated by a photovoltaic system connected to the grid in low latitude countries , 2014 .

[12]  Lawrence L. Kazmerski,et al.  A comprehensive review of the impact of dust on the use of solar energy: History, investigations, results, literature, and mitigation approaches , 2013 .

[13]  Rodrigo Escobar,et al.  Solar energy resource assessment in Chile: Satellite estimation and ground station measurements , 2014 .

[14]  Bodo Littmann,et al.  Direct monitoring of energy lost due to soiling on first solar modules in California , 2012, 2012 IEEE 38th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) PART 2.

[15]  K. Otani,et al.  Long‐term performance degradation of various kinds of photovoltaic modules under moderate climatic conditions , 2011 .

[16]  Rohit Pillai,et al.  Impact of dust on solar photovoltaic (PV) performance: Research status, challenges and recommendations , 2010 .

[17]  Thomas R. Betts,et al.  Dust‐induced shading on photovoltaic modules , 2014 .

[18]  U. Jahn,et al.  Performance of 170 grid connected PV plants in Northern Germany—Analysis of yields and optimization potentials , 1997 .

[19]  S. Pelland,et al.  Estimating the uncertainty in long-term photovoltaic yield predictions , 2013 .

[20]  J. A. del Cueto.  Comparison of energy production and performance from flat-plate photovoltaic module technologies deployed at fixed tilt , 2002, PVSC 2002.

[21]  M. S. El-Shobokshy,et al.  Effect of dust with different physical properties on the performance of photovoltaic cells , 1993 .

[22]  Christian Reise,et al.  Performance ratio revisited: is PR > 90% realistic? , 2011 .

[23]  Shafiqur Rehman,et al.  Performance evaluation of an off-grid photovoltaic system in Saudi Arabia , 2012 .

[24]  F. Pilo,et al.  Evaluation of photovoltaic installations performances in Sardinia , 2013 .

[25]  C. McKay,et al.  Temperature and moisture conditions for life in the extreme arid region of the Atacama desert: four years of observations including the El Niño of 1997-1998. , 2003, Astrobiology.

[26]  William A. Beckman,et al.  Improvement and validation of a model for photovoltaic array performance , 2006 .

[27]  B. Striner,et al.  Photovoltaic module performance and degradation as compared in distinct climatic regions , 2012, 2012 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[28]  Maria Kapsali,et al.  Simulating the dust effect on the energy performance of photovoltaic generators based on experimenta , 2011 .

[29]  John K. Kaldellis,et al.  Systematic experimental study of the pollution deposition impact on the energy yield of photovoltaic installations , 2011 .

[30]  Alastair R. Buckley,et al.  Monitoring nationwide ensembles of PV generators: Limitations and uncertainties. The case of the UK , 2014 .