Land-use and environmental pressures resulting from current and future bioenergy crop expansion: a review.

Recent energy and climate policies, particularly in the developed world, have increased demand for bioenergy2 as an alternative, which has led to both direct and indirect land-use changes and an array of environmental and socio-economic concerns. A comprehensive understanding of the land-use dynamics of bioenergy crop production is essential for the development of sustainable bioenergy and land-use policies. In this paper, we review the patterns and dynamics of land-use change associated with bioenergy crops (hereafter referred to as ’bioenergy-driven land-use change’). The review focuses on four regions as the most prominent locations in which these patterns and changes occur: Brazil; Indonesia and Malaysia; the United States of America (U.S.A.); and the European Union (EU). The review confirms that bioenergy-driven land-use change has affected and will impact most severely on the ’land- and resource-abundant’ developing regions, such as Brazil, where economic development takes priority over sustainable land-use policies, and the enforcement capability is limited. Opportunities for more effective policy are available through the development of international climate change policy (e.g. REDD under the UNFCCC), and certification criteria for sustainable bioenergy products (e.g. EU RED). However, bioenergy produced from no and/or less land-using feedstocks (e.g. wastes and residues), and their associated technologies must be given higher priority to minimise bioenergy-driven land-use change and its negative impacts.

[1]  L. P. Koh,et al.  Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? , 2008 .

[2]  Carl J. Bernacchi,et al.  The impacts of Miscanthus×giganteus production on the Midwest US hydrologic cycle , 2010 .

[3]  S. Hinsley,et al.  The impact of growing miscanthus for biomass on farmland bird populations , 2009 .

[4]  L. P. Koh,et al.  Addressing the threats to biodiversity from oil-palm agriculture , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[5]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Environmental, land-use and economic implications of Brazilian sugarcane expansion 1996–2006 , 2009 .

[6]  F. Achard,et al.  Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Bioenergy, land use change and climate change mitigation. , 2011 .

[8]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon , 2010 .

[9]  Richard M. Cruse,et al.  Sustainable Biofuels Redux , 2008, Science.

[10]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Potential benefits of commercial willow Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) for farm-scale plant and invertebrate communities in the agri-environment , 2011 .

[11]  L. P. Koh,et al.  REDD: a reckoning of environment and development implications. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  A. Beyene,et al.  Introduction: biofuels, food security and land grabbing in Africa , 2011 .

[13]  Burton C. English,et al.  Expanded ethanol production: Implications for agriculture, water demand, and water quality , 2010 .

[14]  R. Schubert,et al.  Future Bioenergy and Sustainable Land Use , 2009 .

[15]  Bruce A. Babcock,et al.  Emerging Biofuels: Outlook of Effects on U.S. Grain, Oilseed, and Livestock Markets , 2007 .

[16]  Robert B Jackson,et al.  Set-asides can be better climate investment than corn ethanol. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[17]  R. DeFries,et al.  Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  C. Field,et al.  Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  Ciro Abbud Righi,et al.  Biomass and greenhouse-gas emissions from land-use change in Brazil's Amazonian “arc of deforestation”: The states of Mato Grosso and Rondônia , 2009 .

[20]  Stephen P. Slinsky,et al.  Bioenergy Crop Production in the United States: Potential Quantities, Land Use Changes, and Economic Impacts on the Agricultural Sector , 2003 .

[21]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Biomass as Feedstock for A Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply , 2005 .

[22]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[23]  P. Pacheco Agrarian Reform in the Brazilian Amazon: Its Implications for Land Distribution and Deforestation , 2009 .

[24]  Dileep K. Birur,et al.  Land Use Changes and Consequent CO2 Emissions due to US Corn Ethanol Production: A Comprehensive Analysis , 2010 .

[25]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Ethanol Production Using Corn, Switchgrass, and Wood; Biodiesel Production Using Soybean and Sunflower , 2005 .

[26]  D. Nepstad,et al.  Interactions among Amazon land use, forests and climate: prospects for a near-term forest tipping point , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  S. Abdullah,et al.  From Forest Landscape to Agricultural Landscape in the Developing Tropical Country of Malaysia: Pattern, Process, and Their Significance on Policy , 2008, Environmental management.

[28]  Shelie A. Miller,et al.  Environmental trade-offs of biobased production. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Lucas Reijnders,et al.  Acute View Transport biofuels: Can they help limiting climate change without an upward impact on food prices? , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[30]  M. Rounsevell,et al.  Land use and climate change in the UK , 2009 .

[31]  Philip W. Gassman,et al.  Impact of land use and land cover change on the water balance of a large agricultural watershed: Historical effects and future directions , 2008 .

[32]  A. Nejadhashemi,et al.  Water quality impact assessment of large-scale biofuel crops expansion in agricultural regions of Michigan , 2011 .

[33]  Ralph E.H. Sims,et al.  Direct and indirect land‐use competition issues for energy crops and their sustainable production – an overview , 2010 .

[34]  S. Polasky,et al.  Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Birka Wicke,et al.  Indirect land use change: review of existing models and strategies for mitigation , 2012 .

[36]  L. Kurkalova,et al.  Land use change in a biofuels hotspot: The case of Iowa, USA , 2011 .

[37]  Soo Chin Liew,et al.  Remotely sensed evidence of tropical peatland conversion to oil palm , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Giorgio Guariso,et al.  A GIS-based approach to evaluate biomass potential from energy crops at regional scale , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[39]  Earthscan Uk Biofuels for transport: global potential and implications for sustainable energy and agriculture. , 2007 .

[40]  Arun Agrawal,et al.  Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation , 2011 .

[41]  J. Nippert,et al.  Potential ecological impacts of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) biofuel cultivation in the Central Great Plains, USA , 2011 .

[42]  Marelli Luisa,et al.  Biofuels: a New Methodology to Estimate GHG Emissions Due to Global Land Use Change - A methodology involving spatial allocation of agricultural land demand, calculation of carbon stocks and estimation of N2O emissions , 2010 .

[43]  Pete Smith,et al.  A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe , 2006 .

[44]  Christopher B Field,et al.  The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[45]  Fernando E. Miguez,et al.  Modeling Miscanthus in the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) to simulate its water quality effects as a bioenergy crop. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Biofuels for Road Transport: A Seed to Wheel Perspective , 2008 .

[47]  John N. Saddler,et al.  Backgrounder: Major Environmental Criteria of Biofuel Sustainability , 2010 .

[48]  G. Fischer,et al.  Biofuel production potentials in Europe: sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part II: Land use scenarios , 2010 .

[49]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Spatial scale and social impacts of biofuel production , 2011 .

[50]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Clive A. McAlpine,et al.  Regrowth forests on abandoned agricultural land: A review of their habitat values for recovering forest fauna , 2007 .

[52]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[53]  D. Sawyer Climate change, biofuels and eco-social impacts in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  P. Fearnside Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: History, Rates, and Consequences , 2005 .

[55]  J. Goldemberg,et al.  The Sustainability of Ethanol Production from Sugarcane , 2008, Renewable Energy.

[56]  E. Gawel,et al.  The iLUC dilemma: How to deal with indirect land use changes when governing energy crops? , 2011 .

[57]  A. Tabeau,et al.  Impact of EU biofuel policies on world agricultural production and land use , 2011 .

[58]  William F. Laurance,et al.  Increasing world consumption of beef as a driver of regional and global change: A call for policy action based on evidence from Queensland (Australia), Colombia and Brazil , 2009 .

[59]  Nobukazu Nakagoshi,et al.  Forest fragmentation and its correlation to human land use change in the state of Selangor, peninsular Malaysia , 2007 .

[60]  R. Hiederer,et al.  Biofuels: a New Methodology to Estimate GHG Emissions from Global Land Use Change A methodology involving spatial allocation of agricultural land demand and estimation of CO2 and N2O emissions , 2010 .

[61]  David S. Powlson,et al.  Biofuels and other approaches for decreasing fossil fuel emissions from agriculture , 2005 .

[62]  D. Mitchell A Note on Rising Food Prices , 2008 .

[63]  Darren T. Drewry,et al.  Implications for the hydrologic cycle under climate change due to the expansion of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  R. Graham,et al.  A framework to assess regional environmental impacts of dedicated energy crop production , 1996, Environmental management.

[65]  W. Payne Are biofuels antithetic to long-term sustainability of soil and water resources? , 2010 .

[66]  Ken E. Giller,et al.  Resource use efficiency and environmental performance of nine major biofuel crops, processed by first-generation conversion techniques , 2010 .

[67]  E. Jelsøe,et al.  Soy production and certification: the case of Argentinean soy-based biodiesel , 2010 .

[68]  C. Tisdell,et al.  The orangutan–oil palm conflict: economic constraints and opportunities for conservation , 2009, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[69]  S. Olsen,et al.  A critical review of biochemical conversion, sustainability and life cycle assessment of algal biofuels , 2011 .

[70]  Lucas Reijnders,et al.  Biofuel Plantations on Forested Lands: Double Jeopardy for Biodiversity and Climate , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[71]  H. Meijl,et al.  The Impact of First and Second Generation Biofuels on Global Agricultural Production, Trade and Land Use , 2008 .

[72]  Roel Hammerschlag,et al.  Ethanol's energy return on investment: a survey of the literature 1990-present. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[73]  S. Filoso,et al.  Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: environmental and social challenges. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[74]  C. Brannstrom,et al.  Land change in the Brazilian Savanna (Cerrado), 1986–2002: Comparative analysis and implications for land-use policy , 2008 .

[75]  E. Gnansounou,et al.  Life cycle assessment of soybean-based biodiesel in Argentina for export , 2009 .

[76]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Brazilian agriculture and environmental legislation: status and future challenges. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[77]  Ian Scoones,et al.  The politics of biofuels, land and agrarian change: editors' introduction , 2010, The Journal of peasant studies.

[78]  G. Taylor,et al.  Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK , 2009 .

[79]  Shuguang Liu,et al.  Impacts of biofuels production alternatives on water quantity and quality in the Iowa River Basin , 2012 .

[80]  Gabriella P.A.G. Pousa,et al.  History and policy of biodiesel in Brazil , 2007 .

[81]  M. Burke,et al.  The Ripple Effect: Biofuels, Food Security, and the Environment , 2007 .

[82]  L. Nielsen,et al.  An environmental life cycle assessment comparing Australian sugarcane with US corn and UK sugar beet as producers of sugars for fermentation. , 2008 .

[83]  T. Mitchell Aide,et al.  Balancing food production and nature conservation in the Neotropical dry forests of northern Argentina , 2008 .

[84]  P. Fearnside Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil , 2001, Environmental Conservation.

[85]  M. Curran,et al.  A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective , 2007 .