Can design go beyond critique? (Trying to compose together in opening production)

This paper aims at contributing to the emerging field of design for social innovation (D4SI) discussing the insights from the author’s long-term involvement as a design researcher in a social innovation project. In order to discuss this experience a particular perspective is introduced, according to which D4SI can be considered an attempt of design to go beyond critique, and, specifically, of composing together (Latour 2010). In this understanding D4SI can be considered as a collective effort towards the construction and exploration of alternative ways of living and working. In deepening how D4SI can be understood as composing together, some reflections are made on the author’s involvement in the maker-space STPLN, a platform where production processes are opened and attempts of composing new ways of making things and delivering services are carried out. By highlighting some of the challenges emerged from being a designer in STPLN, the paper develops two reflections. The first one is related to togetherness and it argues that, in dealing with collective compositionist processes, designers need to acquire skills and look for a possible role that is different from the one of the enabler. The second reflection deals with how to assess composing together. From the experience with STPLN, it emerges how compositions need to be accountable in diverse discourses in order to travel further and, hopefully, generate future prospects.

[1]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Users and computers: A contextual approach to design of computer artifacts , 1996, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Ezio Manzini,et al.  Small projects/large changes: Participatory design as an open participated process , 2011 .

[3]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Rediscovering Social Innovation , 2008 .

[4]  Y. Benkler,et al.  The Wealth of Networks , 2008 .

[5]  宮島 久雄,et al.  Victor Papanek : Design for the Rearl World---Human Ecology and Social Change Pantheon Books, New York 1971. , 1974 .

[6]  M. Bauwens Class and capital in peer production , 2009 .

[7]  Ezio Manzini,et al.  Collaborative services. Social innovation and design for sustainability , 2008 .

[8]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Prototyping and infrastructuring in design for social innovation , 2011 .

[9]  Ann Light,et al.  The human touch: participatory practice and the role of facilitation in designing with communities , 2012, PDC '12.

[10]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Participatory design and "democratizing innovation" , 2010, PDC '10.

[11]  P. Ehn,et al.  Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges , 2012, Design Issues.

[12]  Victor J. Papanek,et al.  Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change , 1972 .

[13]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design , 2012 .

[14]  M. Castells,et al.  Aftermath: The Cultures of the Economic Crisis , 2012 .

[15]  Andrea Botero,et al.  Towards Peer-production in Public Services: cases from Finland , 2012 .

[16]  Thomas A. Lyson,et al.  Civic Agriculture: Reconnecting Farm, Food, and Community , 2004 .

[17]  Anna Szymańska,et al.  R. Murray, J. Caulier-Grice, G. Mulgan, „The Open Book of Social Innovation”, The Young Foundation, NESTA, March 2010 , 2014 .

[18]  B. Latour An Attempt at a “Compositionist Manifesto” , 2010, New Literary History.

[19]  Anna Seravalli,et al.  Building Fabriken : Design for Socially Shaped Innovation , 2012 .

[20]  B. Latour Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern , 2004, Critical Inquiry.

[21]  Anna Meroni,et al.  Creative Communities. People inventing sustainable ways of living. , 2007 .

[22]  Anil Gurung,et al.  Makers: The New Industrial Revolution , 2014 .

[23]  G. Mulgan,et al.  The open book of social innovation , 2010 .

[24]  Alastair Fuad‐Luke Design Activism: Beautiful Strangeness for a Sustainable World , 2009 .