Analysis of image quality and radiation dose in routine adult brain helical and wide-volume computed tomography procedures.

[1]  B. Kataria.  Visual grading evaluation of reconstruction methods and dose optimisation in abdominal Computed Tomography , 2019, Linköping University Medical Dissertations.

[2]  C. Roy,et al.  Wide-volume versus helical acquisition in unenhanced chest CT: prospective intra-patient comparison of diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose in an ultra-low-dose setting , 2019, European Radiology.

[3]  C. Roy,et al.  Wide volume versus helical acquisition using 320-detector row computed tomography for computed tomography urography in adults. , 2018, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[4]  Yeon Jin Cho,et al.  Unenhanced 320-row multidetector computed tomography of the brain in children: comparison of image quality and radiation dose among wide-volume, one-shot volume, and helical scan modes , 2018, Pediatric Radiology.

[5]  Euclid Seeram,et al.  Does iterative reconstruction improve image quality and reduce dose in computed tomography , 2016 .

[6]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Intra-individual diagnostic image quality and organ-specific-radiation dose comparison between spiral cCT with iterative image reconstruction and z-axis automated tube current modulation and sequential cCT , 2016, European journal of radiology open.

[7]  W. Kim,et al.  Pediatric Chest CT: Wide-Volume and Helical Scan Modes in 320-MDCT. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  J. Babb,et al.  Continuous Versus Sequential Acquisition Head Computed Tomography: A Phantom and Clinical Image Quality Comparative Study , 2015, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  F. Zarb,et al.  A comparison of sequential and spiral scanning techniques in brain CT. , 2015, Radiologic technology.

[10]  M. Prokop,et al.  Overranging at multisection CT: an underestimated source of excess radiation exposure. , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  Eberhard Ludewig,et al.  Diagnostic imaging – evaluating image quality using visual grading characteristic (VGC) analysis , 2010, Veterinary Research Communications.

[12]  Lois Romans Ba Rt.  Computed Tomography for Technologists: A Comprehensive Text , 2010 .

[13]  M Båth,et al.  Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  W. Kalender,et al.  X-ray computed tomography , 2019, Machine Learning for Tomographic Imaging.

[15]  R. Geise.  Computed Tomography: Physical Principles, Clinical Applications, and Quality Control , 1995 .

[16]  C. Roy,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the Wide Volume (WV) versus Helical acquisition on a 320-detector row computed tomography for the exploration of the abdominopelvic region in adults , 2017 .

[17]  D. Origgi,et al.  Survey of computed tomography techniques and absorbed dose in Italian hospitals: a comparison between two methods to estimate the dose–length product and the effective dose and to verify fulfilment of the diagnostic reference levels , 2005, European Radiology.