The ethics of industry experimentation using employees: the case of taste-testing pesticide-treated tobacco.

In the United States, companies that use their own funds to test consumer products on their employees are subject to few regulations. Using previously undisclosed tobacco industry documents, we reviewed the history of that industry's efforts to create internal guidelines on the conditions to be met before employee taste testers could evaluate cigarettes made from tobacco treated with experimental pesticides. This history highlights 2 potential ethical issues raised by unregulated industrial research: conflict of interest and lack of informed consent. To ensure compliance with accepted ethical standards, an independent federal office should be established to oversee industrial research involving humans exposed to experimental or increased quantities of ingested, inhaled, or absorbed chemical agents.

[1]  R. Malone,et al.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire? , 2000, Tobacco control.

[2]  S. Gorovitz,et al.  Pesticide Toxicity, Human Subjects, and the Environmental Protection Agency's Dilemma , 2007, The Journal of contemporary health law and policy.

[3]  Norbert Krapf,et al.  MINUTES OF MEETING , 1938, The Guthrie Journal.

[4]  James H. Jones Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment , 1981 .

[5]  George J. Annas Human Subjects Research: A Handbook for Institutional Review Boards , 1983 .

[6]  Jay van Zyl,et al.  Strategic product development , 2000, SPLC.

[7]  N. Wilson,et al.  Events of 11 September 2001 significantly reduced calls to the New Zealand Quitline , 1996, Tobacco control.

[8]  S. Schroeder,et al.  Tobacco control in the wake of the 1998 master settlement agreement. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Bernard Challenor,et al.  Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment , 1982 .

[10]  R. Veatch,et al.  Abandoning informed consent. , 1995, The Hastings Center report.

[11]  Michael R. Hill,et al.  Archival Strategies and Techniques , 1993 .

[12]  T. Lemmens,et al.  Ethics Review for Sale? Conflict of Interest and Commercial Research Review Boards , 2000, The Milbank quarterly.

[13]  D. Resnik,et al.  Responsible Conduct of Research , 2022 .

[14]  Scott R. Freeman,et al.  Human research review committee requirements in medical journals. , 2008, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[15]  B. Kapp,et al.  A history and theory of informed consent , 1986 .

[16]  L. Bero,et al.  Legislating "sound science": the role of the tobacco industry. , 2005, American journal of public health.