Comparison of commercial DNA preparation kits for the detection of Brucellae in tissue using quantitative real-time PCR

BackgroundThe detection of Brucellae in tissue specimens using PCR assays is difficult because the amount of bacteria is usually low. Therefore, optimised DNA extraction methods are critical. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of commercial kits for the extraction of Brucella DNA.MethodsFive kits were evaluated using clinical specimens: QIAamp™ DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN), peqGold™ Tissue DNA Mini Kit (PeqLab), UltraClean™ Tissue and Cells DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio), DNA Isolation Kit for Cells and Tissues (Roche), and NucleoSpin™ Tissue (Macherey-Nagel). DNA yield was determined using a quantitative real-time PCR assay targeting IS711 that included an internal amplification control.ResultsKits of QIAGEN and Roche provided the highest amount of DNA, Macherey-Nagel and Peqlab products were intermediate whereas MoBio yielded the lowest amount of DNA. Differences were significant (p < 0.05) and of diagnostic relevance. Sample volume, elution volume, and processing time were also compared.ConclusionsWe observed differences in DNA yield as high as two orders of magnitude for some samples between the best and the worst DNA extraction kits and inhibition was observed occasionally. This indicates that DNA purification may be more relevant than expected when the amount of DNA in tissue is very low.

[1]  B. Bricker,et al.  PCR as a diagnostic tool for brucellosis. , 2002, Veterinary microbiology.

[2]  K. Bourantas,et al.  Serum Is the Preferred Clinical Specimen for Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis by PCR , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  B. Bricker,et al.  Differentiation of Brucella abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4, Brucella melitensis, Brucella ovis, and Brucella suis bv. 1 by PCR , 1994, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[4]  S. O'leary,et al.  Brucella abortus detection by PCR assay in blood, milk and lymph tissue of serologically positive cows. , 2006, Research in veterinary science.

[5]  S. Al Dahouk,et al.  Laboratory-based diagnosis of brucellosis--a review of the literature. Part I: Techniques for direct detection and identification of Brucella spp. , 2003, Clinical laboratory.

[6]  A. Hensel,et al.  A combination of different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the presumptive identification of Yersinia pestis. , 2000, Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health.

[7]  S. Al Dahouk,et al.  Evaluation of genus-specific and species-specific real-time PCR assays for the identification of Brucella spp. , 2007, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[8]  M. Queipo-Ortuño,et al.  Comparison of seven commercial DNA extraction kits for the recovery of Brucella DNA from spiked human serum samples using real-time PCR , 2008, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.

[9]  Olfert Landt,et al.  Rapid detection of Yersinia pestis with multiplex real-time PCR assays using fluorescent hybridisation probes. , 2003, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[10]  D. S. Leal-Klevezas,et al.  Single-step PCR for detection of Brucella spp. from blood and milk of infected animals , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.