Methods for determining cost-benefit ratios for pharmaceuticals in Germany

The aim of this methodological paper is to summarize evidence on how to implement cost-benefit assessment according to the new German legislative framework (Competition Enhancement Act). Given the complexity of existing health policy frameworks within industrialised countries in adapting health economics in their respective regulatory scheme, no clear international scientific consensus on which health economic methods should be chosen for assessment can be determined. Nevertheless, a broad consensus on the internal properties of methods itself can be found. Based on these common international standards in methodology, this work provides a minimum catalogue of methods and criteria that meet legal and local German requirements with regard to specific factors of its health care system. Aside from categorising clearly defined standards (e.g., study forms, cost and benefit categories) the suggested catalogue specifies some intensively debated areas in Germany (e.g., the QALY, modelling, the perspective used in the assessment). After the proposition of certain methods the paper leads to a first recommendation of a detailed assessment-process itself specific for the German way in implementing cost-benefit ratios within regulatory decision making in Germany.

[1]  Jonathan Karnon,et al.  Alternative decision modelling techniques for the evaluation of health care technologies: Markov processes versus discrete event simulation. , 2003, Health economics.

[2]  J. Gazmararian,et al.  Interdisciplinary epidemiologic and economic research needed to support a universal childhood influenza vaccination policy. , 2006, Epidemiologic reviews.

[3]  W. Brouwer,et al.  A dollar is a dollar is a dollar--or is it? , 2006, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[4]  D Meltzer,et al.  Addressing uncertainty in medical cost-effectiveness analysis implications of expected utility maximization for methods to perform sensitivity analysis and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis to set priorities for medical research. , 2001, Journal of health economics.

[5]  C. Weir,et al.  Statistical evaluation of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints: a literature review , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  D. Torgerson,et al.  Cost of illness studies , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  M Sculpher,et al.  Health Technology Assessment: Development and Future , 2009 .

[8]  M J Buxton,et al.  Assessing the costs of healthcare technologies in clinical trials. , 1999, Health technology assessment.

[9]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Economic Evaluation Alongside Multinational Clinical Trials: Study Considerations for GUSTO iib , 1997, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[10]  A. Briggs Statistical approaches to handling uncertainty in health economic evaluation , 2004, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[11]  J Hjelmgren,et al.  Health economic guidelines--similarities, differences and some implications. , 2001, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[12]  H. Sintonen,et al.  Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: A systematic literature review , 2006, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[13]  M. Drummond,et al.  The lag between effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence of new drugs , 2003, The European Journal of Health Economics, formerly: HEPAC.

[14]  J Raftery,et al.  Costing in economic evaluation , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  U. S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Cen Research,et al.  Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance , 2006, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[16]  Kenneth B Wells,et al.  Burden of Illness , 1968 .

[17]  K Claxton,et al.  The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. , 1999, Journal of health economics.

[18]  C. Mullins,et al.  Cost-of-illness studies : a review of current methods. , 2006, PharmacoEconomics.

[19]  C. Barker,et al.  Opening the debate on DALYs (disability-adjusted life years). , 1996, Health policy and planning.

[20]  P. Jacobs,et al.  The Measurement of Indirect Costs in the Health Economics Evaluation Literature: A Review , 1998, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[21]  Konsensgruppe „Gesundheitsökonomie“ Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation — Hannoveraner Konsens , 1998 .

[22]  Milton C Weinstein,et al.  Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies. , 2003, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[23]  Ross D Crosby,et al.  Estimating a preference-based single index for the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) instrument from the SF-6D. , 2004, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[24]  Frank de Charro,et al.  The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective , 2003, Springer Netherlands.

[25]  E. Nord,et al.  The value of DALY life: problems with ethics and validity of disability adjusted life years , 1999, BMJ.

[26]  Linda Bren,et al.  The importance of patient-reported outcomes...it's all about the patients. , 2006, FDA consumer.

[27]  O. Schöffski Grundformen gesundheitsökonomischer Evaluationen , 2008 .

[28]  Annette Zentner,et al.  Methoden zur vergleichenden Bewertung pharmazeutischer Produkte , 2005 .

[29]  M Johannesson,et al.  On the decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis. , 1993, Journal of health economics.

[30]  M. Postma,et al.  Need for differential discounting of costs and health effects in cost effectiveness analyses , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  R. Busse,et al.  Internationale Standards der Kosten-Nutzen-Bewertung , 2006 .

[32]  M. Drummond,et al.  A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute For Clinical Excellence (NICE) , 2002, The Lancet.

[33]  A H Briggs,et al.  Handling uncertainty in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions , 1999, BMJ.

[34]  M. Koopmanschap,et al.  The friction-cost method : replacement for nothing and leisure for free? , 2005, PharmacoEconomics.

[35]  W. Greiner,et al.  Grundprinzipien einer Wirtschaftlichkeitsuntersuchung , 2008 .

[36]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  When should decision-analytic modeling be used in the economic evaluation of health care? , 2003, The European Journal of Health Economics, formerly: HEPAC.

[37]  Andrew Briggs,et al.  Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: statistical representation of parameter uncertainty. , 2005, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[38]  M. Drummond,et al.  Whither trial-based economic evaluation for health care decision making? , 2006, Health economics.

[39]  C. Murray,et al.  Global burden of disease , 1997, The Lancet.

[40]  M J Buxton,et al.  Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life. , 1997, Health economics.

[41]  G. Sayers An alternative to QALYs: saved young life equivalent (SAVE) , 1992, BMJ.

[42]  Stirling Bryan,et al.  Modelling in the economic evaluation of health care: selecting the appropriate approach , 2004, Journal of health services research & policy.

[43]  J. Graf von der Schulenburg,et al.  Review of European guidelines for economic evaluation of medical technologies and pharmaceuticals , 2000, HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care.

[44]  B. O'brien,et al.  The death of cost-minimization analysis? , 2001, Health economics.

[45]  C. Murray,et al.  Understanding DALYs (disability-adjusted life years). , 1997, Journal of health economics.

[46]  Carol Barker,et al.  Opening the debate on DALYs , 1996 .

[47]  W. Greiner,et al.  Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation , 2009, Medizinische Klinik.

[48]  M. Drummond,et al.  Health Care Technology: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Public Policy@@@Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes , 1988 .

[49]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Definitions and validation criteria for biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: development and testing of a quantitative hierarchical levels of evidence schema. , 2007, The Journal of rheumatology.

[50]  S Simoens,et al.  Using the Delphi technique in economic evaluation: time to revisit the oracle? , 2006, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[51]  Andrew Briggs,et al.  The use of probabilistic decision models in technology assessment , 2004, Applied health economics and health policy.

[52]  W. Greiner,et al.  Das QALY-Konzept zur Verknüpfung von Lebensqualitätseffekten mit ökonomischen Daten , 1998 .

[53]  S R Glicher,et al.  An alternative to QALYs:saved young life equivalent (SAVE) , 1992, BMJ.

[54]  R. Rohrbacher Modellierungen als Grundlage für die Erstattung medizinischer Leistungen - eine internationale Perspektive , 2005 .

[55]  S. Anand,et al.  Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review. , 1997, Journal of health economics.