Evaluating the safety impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on motorways.

Recent technological advancements bring the Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) era closer to reality. CAVs have the potential to vastly improve road safety by taking the human driver out of the driving task. However, the evaluation of their safety impacts has been a major challenge due to the lack of real-world CAV exposure data. Studies that attempt to simulate CAVs by using either a single or integrating multiple simulation platforms have limitations, and in most cases, consider a small element of a network (e.g. a junction) and do not perform safety evaluations due to inherent complexity. This paper addresses this problem by developing a decision-making CAV control algorithm in the simulation software VISSIM, using its External Driver Model Application Programming Interface. More specifically, the developed CAV control algorithm allows a CAV, for the first time, to have longitudinal control, search adjacent vehicles, identify nearby CAVs and make lateral decisions based on a ruleset associated with motorway traffic operations. A motorway corridor within M1 in England is designed in VISSIM and employed to implement the CAV control algorithm. Five simulation models are created, one for each weekday. The baseline models (i.e. CAV market penetration: 0%) are calibrated and validated using real-world minute-level inductive loop detector data and also data collected from a radar-equipped vehicle. The safety evaluation of the proposed algorithm is conducted using the Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM). The results show that CAVs bring about compelling benefit to road safety as traffic conflicts significantly reduce even at relatively low market penetration rates. Specifically, estimated traffic conflicts were reduced by 12-47%, 50-80%, 82-92% and 90-94% for 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% CAV penetration rates respectively. Finally, the results indicate that the presence of CAVs ensured efficient traffic flow.

[1]  S. Poczter,et al.  The Google Car: Driving Toward A Better Future? , 2013 .

[2]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Modeling Driver Behavior and Safety on Freeway Merging Areas , 2008 .

[3]  Zhixia Li,et al.  Modeling Reservation-Based Autonomous Intersection Control in VISSIM , 2013 .

[4]  Byungkyu Brian Park,et al.  MOBYSIM: An integrated traffic simulation platform , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  Michael T. Whaley Developing freeway merging calibration techniques for analysis of ramp metering In Georgia through VISSIM simulation , 2016 .

[6]  Lili Du,et al.  Cooperative platoon control for a mixed traffic flow including human drive vehicles and connected and autonomous vehicles , 2018, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[7]  Rahul Joshi,et al.  Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM): Software User Manual , 2008 .

[8]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation: Final Report , 2008 .

[9]  Seolyoung Lee,et al.  Is vehicle automation enough to prevent crashes? Role of traffic operations in automated driving environments for traffic safety. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Siobhán Clarke,et al.  MDDSVsim: an integrated traffic simulation platform for autonomous vehicle research , 2012 .

[11]  B. Hayes,et al.  Leave the Driving to It , 2011 .

[12]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Transferability of calibrated microsimulation model parameters for safety assessment using simulated conflicts. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Wei Wang,et al.  Using VISSIM simulation model and Surrogate Safety Assessment Model for estimating field measured traffic conflicts at freeway merge areas , 2013 .

[14]  Frank F Saccomanno,et al.  Application of traffic microsimulation for evaluating safety performance of urban signalized intersections , 2015 .

[15]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume III: Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Modeling Software , 2004 .

[16]  Rosaldo J. F. Rossetti,et al.  An integrated architecture for autonomous vehicles simulation , 2012, SAC '12.

[17]  Rosaldo J. F. Rossetti,et al.  An approach to simulate autonomous vehicles in urban traffic scenarios , 2009, 2009 12th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[18]  Wei Wang,et al.  Identifying if VISSIM simulation model and SSAM provide reasonable estimates for field measured traffic conflicts at signalized intersections. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Bernhard Friedrich,et al.  Developing a micro-simulation tool for autonomous connected vehicle platoons used in city logistics , 2017 .

[20]  Sun Jian,et al.  Calibration of VISSIM for Shanghai expressway using genetic algorithm , 2005, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2005..

[21]  Filmon Habtemichael,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of VISSIM Driver Behavior Parameters on Safety of Simulated Vehicles and Their Interaction with Operations of Simulated Traffic , 2013 .

[22]  C. Pinto How Autonomous Vehicle Policy in California and Nevada Addresses Technological and Non-Technological Liabilities , 2012 .

[23]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Model Predictive Control for Motorway Traffic with Mixed Manual and VACS-equipped Vehicles☆ , 2015 .

[24]  Brian Lee Smith,et al.  Investigating Benefits of IntelliDriveSM in Freeway Operations--Lane Changing Advisory Case Study , 2010 .

[25]  Daniel J. Fagnant,et al.  Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations , 2015 .

[26]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Understanding the Highway Safety Benefits of Different Approaches of Connected Vehicles in Reduced Visibility Conditions , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[27]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Longitudinal safety evaluation of connected vehicles' platooning on expressways. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.