Pathologic correlation of sonographic echogenic foci in the fetal heart

The goal of the current paper is to present, on the basis of six investigated fetal hearts, the pathological substrate of prenatally, sonographically diagnosed echogenic intramyocardial foci. The right ventricle, left ventricle, interventricular septum and papillary muscles of both ventricles of six hearts of the fetuses of high‐risk pregnant women showing sonographically diagnosed intramyocardial echogenic foci were investigated. At termination of pregnancy all the women were between the 20th and the 24th week of gestation. Of the six cases, four were induced abortions and two were spontaneous abortions. For the control group we investigated the hearts of two fetuses without heart defects at the 22nd and 23rd week of gestation which had proven extracardial anomalies and a normal karyotype. Both cases were induced abortions which prenatally showed no echogenic cardiac foci. In all eight cases a prenatal karyotyping was performed. In the six cases with echogenic foci the location and number of the foci were determined both prenatally and by means of histologic sections; the size of the foci was measured as well. Histological staining was with routine haematoxylin‐eosin; Masson–Goldner was used for connective tissue; Kossa for calcification; and Berlin blue for haemosiderin. Histologically, in all six cases, intramyocardial calcifications surrounded by fibrotic tissue were in: papillary muscle of the left ventricle in six cases; papillary muscle of the right ventricle in one case; and the subendocardial myocardium of the right ventricle in one case. Four cases had one, one case had two and one case had three calcified foci. Three cases had cardiac and two cases had extracardiac anomalies. Four cases had chromosome anomalies: two were trisomy 21, one trisomy 13 and one triploidy. The remaining two cases had a normal karyotype. No case showed pathological changes of the chordae tendinae, myocardial cell necrosis or inflammation. There were no patho‐morphological differences between the intramyocardial calcifications of the papillary muscles in cases with chromosome anomalies and with normal karyotype. As the patho‐morphological correlate of the sonographically diagnosed echogenic foci, histological investigation on all six fetal hearts showed coarse intramyocardial calcifications surrounded by myocardial fibrosis. Conventional histological methods gave no indication of the cause of the intramyocardial calcifications. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. Simpson,et al.  The cardiac echogenic focus , 1999, Prenatal diagnosis.

[2]  M. Sklansky,et al.  Prevalence of aneuploidy with a cardiac intraventricular echogenic focus in an at‐risk patient population. , 1999, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[3]  W. Sepulveda,et al.  Significance of echogenic foci in the fetal heart , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[4]  J. Wax,et al.  Fetal intracardiac echogenic foci: does it matter which ventricle? , 1998, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[5]  E. Lieberman,et al.  Significance of an echogenic intracardiac focus in fetuses at high and low risk for aneuploidy. , 1998, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[6]  S. Yagel,et al.  Prenatal Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Fetal Heart Echogenic Foci: No Correlation With Down Syndrome , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  G. Sharland,et al.  The significance of echogenic foci in the fetal heart: a prospective study of 228 cases , 1996, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  G. Dildy,et al.  Prospective evaluation of the antenatal incidence and postnatal significance of the fetal echogenic cardiac focus: a case-control study. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  B. Petrikovsky,et al.  Unusual appearances of echogenic foci within the fetal heart: are they benign? , 1996, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[10]  M. Bronshtein,et al.  MULTIPLE FETAL INTRACARDIAC ECHOGENIC FOCI: NOT ALWAYS A BENIGN SONOGRAPHIC FINDING , 1996, Prenatal diagnosis.

[11]  E. Lieberman,et al.  Echogenic Intracardiac Focus: A Sonographic Sign for Fetal Down Syndrome , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  N. Fisk,et al.  Echogenic foci in the fetal heart: a marker of chromosomal abnormality , 1995, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[13]  D. Brown,et al.  Left ventricular echogenic focus in the fetal heart: pathologic correlation. , 1994, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[14]  J. Villafane,et al.  Small hyperechoic ventricle: a benign foci of the fetal cardiac sonographic finding? , 1994, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  D. Roberts,et al.  Cardiac histologic pathology characteristic of trisomies 13 and 21. , 1992, Human pathology.

[16]  M. Mintz,et al.  The left ventricular echogenic focus: a normal finding. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  M. Gewitz,et al.  In utero thickening of the chordae tendinae. A cause of intracardiac echogenic foci. , 1987, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.