Flow velocity estimation using a fish-shaped lateral line probe with product-moment correlation features and a neural network

Abstract Environmental studies on fish require measurements of highly turbulent flows in both the laboratory and in the field. A fish-shaped bioinspired flow measuring device is applied in conjunction with data processing workflow which leverages the interactions between the body and the surrounding flow field for velocity estimation in turbulent flows. Our objective is to develop a robust velocity estimation methodology relevant for studies of fish behavior using a bioinspired fish-shaped artificial lateral line probe (LLP). We show that the device is capable of covering the range of flow velocities from 0 to 1.5 m/s. Three different sets of experiments performed in a closed flow tunnel, a model vertical slot fishway and laboratory open channel flume were collected and combined to provide time-averaged flow velocity and LLP measurements under fully turbulent flow conditions. Based on the experimental results, a signal processing workflow using Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (PCC) features in conjunction with an artificial neural network (ANN) is presented. Using PCC features provides a simple data fusion methodology exploiting the use of the LLP's as a simultaneous collocated sensing array. In this work we show that (1) the PCC-ANN workflow provides the first LLP velocity estimator without repeated calibration across the full span of 0–1.5 m/s, (2) using all pressure sensors results in the best performance with R 2 =0.917, but requires a PCC feature matrix of 55 dimensions and (3) a stepwise reduction of the PCC feature matrix allows for the use of as few as 11 dimensions, and results in R 2 =0.911, indicating that a modest reduction in LLP velocity estimation performance can be gained by a large reduction in dimensionality. A surprising finding was that after stepwise reduction, the best performing sensor pair combinations were not the expected pitot-like anteroposterior couples spanning from nose to body. Instead, it was found that optimal velocity estimation using the LLP exploited a network of sensor pairs. It is shown that the LLP can be implemented similar to an ADV for highly turbulent flows over the range of 0–1.5 m/s, and in addition provides body-centric pressure distributions which may aid in the interpretation of fish hydrodynamic preferences in future environmental studies.

[1]  M. Gevrey,et al.  Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models , 2003 .

[2]  Takuma Suzuki,et al.  Noise of Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter Data in Bubbly Flows , 2007 .

[3]  A. Roy,et al.  Measuring water velocity in highly turbulent flows: field tests of an electromagnetic current meter (ECM) and an acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) , 2007 .

[4]  B. Melville,et al.  Flow Measurement Using Flying ADV Probes , 2007 .

[5]  Ali Assi,et al.  Using MATLAB to Develop Artificial Neural Network Models for Predicting Global Solar Radiation in Al Ain City – UAE , 2011 .

[6]  Peter Oberle,et al.  Beitrag zu detaillierten Analysen der Hydraulik von Schlitzpässen , 2015, WASSERWIRTSCHAFT.

[7]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Sensory integration in the hydrodynamic world of rainbow trout , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Olivier Richoux,et al.  Laser Doppler Velocimetry for Joint Measurements of Acoustic and Mean Flow Velocities: LMS-Based Algorithm and CRB Calculation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[9]  Shane P. Windsor,et al.  The flow fields involved in hydrodynamic imaging by blind Mexican cave fish (Astyanax fasciatus). Part I: open water and heading towards a wall , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  J. Liao,et al.  The Hydrodynamics of Flow Stimuli , 2013 .

[11]  Ramon Cabrera,et al.  Acoustic-Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) for Laboratory Use , 1994 .

[12]  Inaam A. Juma,et al.  Analysis of hydraulic characteristics for hollow semi-circular weirs using artificial neural networks , 2014 .

[13]  Peter Davidson,et al.  Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers , 2015 .

[14]  T. Beechie,et al.  Global Review of the Physical and Biological Effectiveness of Stream Habitat Rehabilitation Techniques , 2008 .

[15]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  Hydrodynamic and Acoustic Field Detection , 1988 .

[16]  Novel particle image velocimetry system based on three-color pulsed lamps and image processing , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[17]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Review of Input Variable Selection Methods for Artificial Neural Networks , 2011 .

[18]  Amir Hossein Zaji,et al.  Application of artificial neural network and genetic programming models for estimating the longitudinal velocity field in open channel junctions , 2015 .

[19]  F. Travade,et al.  THINKING LIKE A FISH: A KEY INGREDIENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF EFFECTIVE FISH PASSAGE FACILITIES AT RIVER OBSTRUCTIONS , 2012 .

[20]  Joni-Kristian Kämäräinen,et al.  Joint Estimation of Bulk Flow Velocity and Angle Using a Lateral Line Probe , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[21]  J. Crimaldi,et al.  The accuracy of acoustic Doppler velocimetry measurements in turbulent boundary layer flows over a smooth bed , 2007 .

[22]  Lipo Wang,et al.  A new view of flow topology and conditional statistics in turbulence , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  Pawel Ligeza Use of Natural Fluctuations of Flow Parameters for Measurement of Velocity Vector , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.