Screening for Breast Cancer: Systematic Evidence Review Update for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force
暂无分享,去创建一个
H. Nelson | K. Tyne | A. Naik | C. Bougatsos | B. Chan | L. Humphrey | Kari Tyne
[1] Keeping abreast. , 1968, American journal of pharmacy and the sciences supporting public health.
[2] J. Farrow. The James Ewing lecture current concepts in the detection and treatment of the earliest of the early breast cancers , 1970 .
[3] R. Millis,et al. In situ intraduct carcinoma of the breast: A long term follow‐up study , 1975, The British journal of surgery.
[4] R. E. Snyder,et al. Prospective study of non‐infiltrating carcinoma of the breast , 1977, Cancer.
[5] P. Rosen,et al. Intraductal carcinoma. Long-term follow-up after treatment by biopsy alone. , 1978 .
[6] C. Fox,et al. Breast-cancer screening. , 1979, Lancet.
[7] P. Rosen,et al. The clinical significance of pre‐invasive breast carcinoma , 1980, Cancer.
[8] E. Trell. Community-based preventive medical department for individual risk factor assessment and intervention in an urban population. , 1983, Preventive medicine.
[9] H. Vorherr. Pathobiology of breast cancer--treatment implications. , 1984, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.
[10] L. Tabár,et al. REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY Randomised Trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare , 1985, The Lancet.
[11] W. Odling-Smee,et al. Screening for Breast Cancer , 1985, The Lancet.
[12] Mammographic breast cancer screening--a randomized trial in Malmö, Sweden. , 1985, Maturitas.
[13] S Shapiro,et al. Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the Health Insurance Plan Study: a randomized trial with breast cancer screening. , 1985, National Cancer Institute monograph.
[14] S. Fletcher,et al. Clinical breast examination. , 1986, Hospital practice.
[15] J. Habbema,et al. Age-specific reduction in breast cancer mortality by screening: an analysis of the results of the Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York study. , 1986, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[16] S. Paik,et al. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol 6). I. Intraductal carcinoma (DCIS) , 1986 .
[17] V. Semiglazov,et al. Breast self-examination for the early detection of breast cancer: a USSR/WHO controlled trial in Leningrad. , 1987, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.
[18] T. Landberg,et al. Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. , 1988, BMJ.
[19] S. Schnitt,et al. In situ carcinoma of the breast. , 1989, Annual review of medicine.
[20] L. Tabár,et al. The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit. , 1989, Journal of epidemiology and community health.
[21] I. Fentiman. The treatment of in situ breast cancer. , 1989, Acta oncologica.
[22] A. Huggins,et al. Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years , 1990, The Lancet.
[23] D. Weaver,et al. Alternatives in the surgical management of in situ breast cancer. A meta-analysis of outcome. , 1990, The American surgeon.
[24] M. Spittle. The management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 1990, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).
[25] C. Redmond,et al. Conservative management of intraductal carcinoma (DCIS) of the breast , 1991, Journal of surgical oncology.
[26] G. Guyatt,et al. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[27] J. Hollenberg,et al. Breast Cancer Screening for Elderly Women with and without Comorbid Conditions , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[28] Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for intraductal carcinoma of the breast. , 1992, The Journal of the Florida Medical Association.
[29] M. Morrow. Pre-cancerous breast lesions: implications for breast cancer prevention trials. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[30] A. Miller,et al. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[31] A. Miller,et al. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[32] S. Wall,et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials , 1993, The Lancet.
[33] V. Semiglazov,et al. Study of the role of breast self-examination in the reduction of mortality from breast cancer. The Russian Federation/World Health Organization Study. , 1993, European journal of cancer.
[34] A. Richardson,et al. The effectiveness of breast cancer screening by mammography in younger women. , 1993, The Online journal of current clinical trials.
[35] B. Muir,et al. The Edinburgh randomised trial of breast cancer screening: results after 10 years of follow-up. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.
[36] P. Stomper,et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: the mammographer's perspective. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[37] W. Dupont,et al. Continued local recurrence of carcinoma 15–25 years after a diagnosis of low grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated only by biopsy , 1995, Cancer.
[38] M. Morrow. The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ. Implications for clinical decision making , 1995, Cancer.
[39] M. Broussard,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. , 1995, Radiologic technology.
[40] Karla Kerlikowske,et al. Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40–49 years: Current evidence from randomized controlled trials , 1995, Cancer.
[41] L. Tabár,et al. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results swedish two‐county trial , 1995, Cancer.
[42] K. Kerlikowske,et al. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 1996, JAMA.
[43] J. Hendriks,et al. Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: Evidence for a reduction in breast cancer mortality , 1996, International journal of cancer.
[44] F. Alexander,et al. The Edinburgh Randomized Trial of Breast Cancer Screening. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[45] J. Boyages,et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ. Part I: Definition and diagnosis. , 1997, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.
[46] J. Boyages,et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ. Part 2: Treatment. , 1997, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.
[47] K. Kerlikowske,et al. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[48] J. Frisell,et al. The Stockholm Mammographic Screening Trial: Risks and benefits in age group 40-49 years. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[49] D. Ransohoff,et al. Lessons from the Mammography Screening Controversy: Can We Improve the Debate? , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[50] L Nyström,et al. Updated overview of the Swedish Randomized Trials on Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography: age group 40-49 at randomization. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[51] B. Cox. Variation in the effectiveness of breast screening by year of follow-up. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[52] S. Self,et al. Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: methodology and preliminary results. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[53] R. Hendrick,et al. Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[54] I Andersson,et al. Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmö Mammographic Screening Program. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[55] C J Baines,et al. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: update on breast cancer mortality. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[56] R. Harris. Variation of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening with age. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[57] J. Earp,et al. Race and mammography use in two North Carolina counties. , 1997, American journal of public health.
[58] L. Tabár,et al. Recent results from the Swedish Two-County Trial: the effects of age, histologic type, and mode of detection on the efficacy of breast cancer screening. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[59] S. Duffy,et al. The Gothenburg Breast Cancer Screening Trial: preliminary results on breast cancer mortality for women aged 39-49. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[60] K. Kerlikowske,et al. Efficacy of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years: comparison of relative and absolute benefit. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[61] B. Macmahon,et al. Randomization in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a review for evidence of subversion. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[62] R E Hendrick,et al. Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40-49 years. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[63] M. Fishbein. False positive rate of screening mammography. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.
[64] D. Berry,et al. Benefits and risks of screening mammography for women in their forties: a statistical appraisal. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[65] A. Mushlin,et al. Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.
[66] C J Baines,et al. The Gothenburg breast screening trial , 1997, Cancer.
[67] J. Elmore,et al. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.
[68] S. Moss. A trial to study the effect on breast cancer mortality of annual mammographic screening in women starting at age 40 , 1999, Journal of medical screening.
[69] J. Elmore,et al. Breast Symptoms among Women Enrolled in a Health Maintenance Organization: Frequency, Evaluation, and Outcome , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[70] W. Hepburn,et al. 14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening , 1999, The Lancet.
[71] S. Dobie,et al. Prophylactic mastectomy for prevention of breast cancer. , 1999, The Journal of family practice.
[72] S. Fletcher,et al. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? , 1999, JAMA.
[73] Update of the Swedish Two-County Trial of breast cancer screening: histologic grade-specific and age-specific results. , 1999, Swiss surgery = Schweizer Chirurgie = Chirurgie suisse = Chirurgia svizzera.
[74] L. Smeeth,et al. Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analyses—sometimes informative, usually misleading , 1999, BMJ.
[75] L. Esserman,et al. Management of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 1999, The Surgical clinics of North America.
[76] S. Cummings,et al. Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years: impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness. , 1999, JAMA.
[77] J. Boyages,et al. Predictors of local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: a meta-analysis. , 1999, Cancer.
[78] H. Welch,et al. US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey. , 2000, BMJ.
[79] C. Carter,et al. Breast cancer attitudes, knowledge, and screening behavior in women with and without a family history of breast cancer. , 2000, Health care for women international.
[80] Screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.
[81] M. Sasa,et al. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan. , 2000, Anticancer research.
[82] J. Randal. After 40 years, mammography remains as much emotion as science. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[83] Decision analysis for the cost effectiveness of sestamibi scintimammography in minimizing unnecessary biopsies. , 2000, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.
[84] C. Catzavelos. Part III. The pathobiology of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2000, Current problems in cancer.
[85] L. J. van der Kamp,et al. False-positive findings in mammography screening induces short-term distress - breast cancer-specific concern prevails longer. , 2000, European journal of cancer.
[86] M. Overgaard,et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging in breast cancer patients treated with or without post-mastectomy radiotherapy. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[87] Effect of screening programme on mortality from breast cancer. Investment in treatment would be more cost effective. , 2000, BMJ.
[88] J. Mayer,et al. Rates and correlates of discomfort associated with mammography. , 2000, Radiology.
[89] H. D. de Koning. Breast cancer screening; cost-effective in practice? , 2000, European journal of radiology.
[90] Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) eight‐year update of protocol B‐17 , 2000, Cancer.
[91] R. Blanks,et al. Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990-8: comparison of observed with predicted mortality , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[92] K. Kerlikowske,et al. Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.
[93] P. Langenberg,et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[94] Does mammography add any benefit to a thorough clinical breast examination (CBE)? , 2000, The Journal of family practice.
[95] L. Nyström. Screening mammography re-evaluated , 2000, The Lancet.
[96] S. Feig,et al. An introduction to economic issues in breast imaging. , 2000, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[97] A. Miller,et al. Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[98] L. Nyström,et al. How effective is screening for breast cancer? , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[99] R. Warren,et al. Interval cancers as an indicator of perfomance in breast screening , 2000, Breast cancer.
[100] K. Lee,et al. Clinical breast examination for screening of asymptomatic women: the importance of clinical breast examination for breast cancer detection. , 2000, Yonsei medical journal.
[101] Mette Cathrine Lauridsen,et al. Physiotherapy treatment of late symptoms following surgical treatment of breast cancer. , 2000, Breast.
[102] G. Sakorafas,et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: evolving perspectives. , 2000, Cancer treatment reviews.
[103] Peter C Gøtzsche,et al. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? , 2000, The Lancet.
[104] J. Lamb,et al. Pathology characteristics that optimize outcome prediction of a breast screening trial , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.
[105] D. Gyrd-Hansen,et al. Cost implications of routine mammography screening of women 50-69 years in the county of Funen, Denmark. , 2000, Health policy.
[106] K. Eriksson,et al. Long‐term outcome of the Malmö Preventive Project: mortality and cardiovascular morbidity , 2000, Journal of internal medicine.
[107] L. Esserman,et al. Integration of breast imaging into cancer management , 2000, Current oncology reports.
[108] A framework for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of MRI screening for breast cancer , 2000, European Radiology.
[109] A. Gelfand,et al. Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[110] Reporting of screening results , 2000, Journal of medical screening.
[111] J. Overgaard,et al. Late treatment-related morbidity in breast cancer patients randomized to postmastectomy radiotherapy and systemic treatment versus systemic treatment alone. , 1999, Acta oncologica.
[112] L. Nyström,et al. Service screening with mammography in Sweden--evaluation of effects of screening on breast cancer mortality in age group 40-49 years. , 2000, Acta oncologica.
[113] L. Tabár,et al. The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up. , 2000, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[114] W. Black,et al. When should we stop screening? , 2000, Effective clinical practice : ECP.
[115] David Atkins,et al. Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2001 .
[116] M D Schnall,et al. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. , 2001, Radiology.
[117] L. Walter,et al. Screening mammography for frail older women: what are the burdens? , 2001, Journal of general internal medicine.
[118] L. Tabár,et al. Beyond randomized controlled trials , 2001, Cancer.
[119] P. Dempsey,et al. Reducing the cost of diagnosis of breast carcinoma , 2001, Cancer.
[120] M. Schooff,et al. Is breast self-examination an effective screening measure for breast cancer? , 2001, The Journal of family practice.
[121] D. Wickerham,et al. Ductal carcinoma-in-situ. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[122] D. Carter,et al. Breast carcinoma in situ: risk factors and screening patterns. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[123] D K Wagener,et al. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[124] G. Noël,et al. [Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853]. , 2001, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.
[125] J. Bergh,et al. Short- and long-term anxiety and depression in women recalled after breast cancer screening. , 2001, European journal of cancer.
[126] J. Costantino,et al. Tamoxifen and depression: more evidence from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project's Breast Cancer Prevention (P-1) Randomized Study. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[127] N. Baxter. Preventive health care, 2001 update: should women be routinely taught breast self-examination to screen for breast cancer? , 2001, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[128] M. J. van de Vijver,et al. Histological type and marker expression of the primary tumour compared with its local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.
[129] Peter C Gøtzsche,et al. Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography , 2001, The Lancet.
[130] Alan C. Evans,et al. False-negative breast screening assessment: what lessons can we learn? , 2001, Clinical radiology.
[131] Breast screening--time for review. , 2001, The New Zealand medical journal.
[132] S. Sutton,et al. False positive results do not have a negative effect on reattendance for subsequent breast screening , 2001, Journal of medical screening.
[133] R. Demicheli,et al. Breast cancer screening for women aged 40-49 years: screening may not be the benign process usually thought. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[134] D. Faverly,et al. Accuracy of frozen section diagnoses of breast lesions after introduction of a national programme in mammographic screening , 2001, Histopathology.
[135] E. Fishell,et al. In Situ Duct Carcinoma of the Breast: Clinical and Histopathologic Factors and Association with Recurrent Carcinoma , 2001, The breast journal.
[136] Pros and cons of mammographic screening , 2001, Journal of surgical oncology.
[137] L. Nyström,et al. Service screening with mammography of women aged 50–69 years in Sweden: effects on mortality from breast cancer , 2001, Journal of medical screening.
[138] C. Drossaert,et al. Does mammographic screening and a negative result affect attitudes towards future breast screening? , 2001, Journal of medical screening.
[139] I. Ellis,et al. Screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): overdiagnosis or an obligate precursor of invasive disease? , 2001, Journal of medical screening.
[140] Screening Mammography: Is It Suitably Targeted to Older Women Who are Most Likely to Benefit? , 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
[141] L. Walter,et al. Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. , 2001, JAMA.
[142] G. Vlastos,et al. MR imaging: breast cancer staging and screening. , 2001, Seminars in surgical oncology.
[143] Study of radiation induced cancers in a breast screening programme. , 2001, Radiation protection dosimetry.
[144] B. V. VON Schoultz,et al. Mammographic breast density during hormone replacement therapy: effects of continuous combination, unopposed transdermal and low-potency estrogen regimens , 2001, Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society.
[145] L Duchateau,et al. Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[146] [Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: costs and efficiency]. , 2001, Onkologie.
[147] G. Schwartz. The Current Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ , 2001, The breast journal.
[148] E. Burnside,et al. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States. , 2001, Clinical breast cancer.
[149] K. Lindfors,et al. False-positive screening mammograms: effect of immediate versus later work-up on patient stress. , 2001, Radiology.
[150] A. Miller. Screening for breast cancer with mammography , 2001, The Lancet.
[151] Aspects in mammographic screening. Detection, prediction, recurrence and prognosis. , 2001, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.
[152] C. Mulrow,et al. Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.
[153] T. Perneger,et al. Misconceptions about efficacy of mammography screening: a public health dilemma , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.
[154] R. Warren,et al. Screening women at high risk of breast cancer on the basis of evidence. , 2001, European journal of radiology.
[155] E. Winer,et al. Knowledge, satisfaction, and perceived cancer risk among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2001, Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine.
[156] S. Narod,et al. Re: Canadian national breast screening study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[157] M. Hakama,et al. Programme sensitivity and effectiveness of mammography service screening in Helsinki, Finland , 2002, Journal of medical screening.
[158] Roberta M Ray,et al. Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[159] L. Tabár,et al. All-cause mortality among breast cancer patients in a screening trial: support for breast cancer mortality as an end point , 2002, Journal of medical screening.
[160] V. Beral,et al. Predictors of outcome of mammography in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme , 2002, Journal of medical screening.
[161] Ralph Gonzales,et al. Public Expectations and Attitudes for Annual Physical Examinations and Testing , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[162] S. Singletary,et al. Standard for the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast (DCIS) , 2002, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[163] R. Warren,et al. What is the recall rate of breast MRI when used for screening asymptomatic women at high risk? , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.
[164] D. Haggstrom,et al. All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[165] A. Berg,et al. Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[166] T. M. Kolb,et al. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.
[167] T. To,et al. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: Breast Cancer Mortality after 11 to 16 Years of Follow-up: A Randomized Screening Trial of Mammography in Women Age 40 to 49 Years , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[168] M. Frankenberg-Schwager,et al. Enhanced Neoplastic Transformation by Mammography X Rays Relative to 200 kVp X Rays: Indication for a Strong Dependence on Photon Energy of the RBEM for Various End Points , 2002, Radiation research.
[169] J. Law,et al. Concerning the relationship between benefit and radiation risk, and cancers detected and induced, in a breast screening programme. , 2002, The British journal of radiology.
[170] T. Kazerooni,et al. Assessment of a breast cancer screening programme in Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran. , 2002, Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit.
[171] H. Cody. Current surgical management of breast cancer , 2002, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.
[172] Teaching breast self-examination in developing countries does not reduce breast cancer deaths. , 2002, Report on medical guidelines & outcomes research.
[173] J. Elmore,et al. Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[174] L. Liberman,et al. Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[175] R. Young,et al. A breast cancer education and on-site screening intervention for unscreened African American women. , 2002, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.
[176] Sara Godward,et al. Impact of false-positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer , 2002, Breast Cancer Research.
[177] K. Kerlikowske,et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[178] S. Woolf,et al. Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[179] S. Feig. Current status of screening mammography. , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.
[180] S. Plevritis,et al. Ethical issues in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging screening for breast cancer. , 2002, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.
[181] Benefits, harms and costs of screening mammography in women 70 years and over: a systematic review , 2002, The Medical journal of Australia.
[182] K. Cheng. Update on effects of screening mammography , 2002, The Lancet.
[183] H. Hussain,et al. How significant is detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in a breast screening programme? , 2002, Clinical radiology.
[184] Ingvar Andersson,et al. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials , 2002, The Lancet.
[185] V. Jackson. Screening mammography: controversies and headlines. , 2002, Radiology.
[186] The evaluation of women with familial risk of breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.
[187] R. Warren,et al. Is breast MRI ever useful in a mammographic screening programme? , 2002, Clinical radiology.
[188] M O Leach,et al. The UK national study of magnetic resonance imaging as a method of screening for breast cancer (MARIBS). , 2002, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.
[189] F. O'Malley,et al. The Role of HER2/neu Overexpression/Amplification in the Progression of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Carcinoma of the Breast , 2002, Modern Pathology.
[190] Is it worth screening women over 70 for breast cancer — or indeed any women? , 2002, The Medical journal of Australia.
[191] M Baum,et al. First results from the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS-I): a randomised prevention trial , 2002, The Lancet.
[192] Experts at odds over mammography , 2002, Nature Medicine.
[193] The evidence to support mammography screening. , 2002, The Netherlands journal of medicine.
[194] F. Vicini,et al. Age at diagnosis and outcome for women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast: a critical review of the literature. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[195] Evis Sala,et al. The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial , 2003, Cancer.
[196] False-Positive Result and Reattendance in the Ontario Breast Screening Program , 2003, Journal of medical screening.
[197] W. Thompson,et al. Does screen-detected breast cancer have better survival than symptomatic breast cancer? , 2003, Asian journal of surgery.
[198] Alfons G H Kessels,et al. The additional diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.
[199] H. D. de Koning. Mammographic screening: evidence from randomised controlled trials. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[200] L. Tabár,et al. Mammography and breast cancer: the new era , 2003, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
[201] C. Baines. Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent? , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[202] Karla Kerlikowske,et al. Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[203] P. Boyle. Global summit on mammographic screening. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[204] C. Baines. Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent? (Countering the counterpoint). , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[205] C. D'Orsi,et al. International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[206] S. Gapstur,et al. Mujeres felices por ser saludables: a breast cancer risk reduction program for Latino women. , 2003, Preventive Medicine.
[207] Ahmedin Jemal,et al. Trends in Breast Cancer by Race and Ethnicity , 2003, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[208] Acog. ACOG practice bulletin Breast Cancer Screening , 2003, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
[209] E. A. Paul,et al. Breast self-examination and death from breast cancer: a meta-analysis , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.
[210] G. Bucht,et al. False‐Negative Cases of Breast Cancer Deaths in Mammography Screening Evaluations , 2003, The breast journal.
[211] L. Nyström,et al. Service screening with mammography of women aged 70-74 years in Sweden. Effects on breast cancer mortality. , 2003, Cancer detection and prevention.
[212] Daniel B Kopans,et al. The most recent breast cancer screening controversy about whether mammographic screening benefits women at any age: nonsense and nonscience. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[213] L. Tabár,et al. Quantifying the potential problem of overdiagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer screening. , 2003, European journal of cancer.
[214] Mandana Vahabi,et al. BREAST CANCER SCREENING METHODS: A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE , 2003, Health care for women international.
[215] Screening for breast cancer with MRI. , 2003 .
[216] L. Tabár,et al. The Swedish Two-County Trial of mammographic screening: cluster randomisation and end point evaluation. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[217] Isabelle Bedrosian,et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Cancer.
[218] Karla Kerlikowske,et al. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. , 2003, JAMA.
[219] Local failure and prognostic factors in ductal carcinoma in situ: concentration on recent publications , 2003, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.
[220] Alexandra L Hanlon,et al. Routine mammography is associated with earlier stage disease and greater eligibility for breast conservation in breast carcinoma patients age 40 years and older , 2003, Cancer.
[221] P. Gøtzsche,et al. Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[222] T. Holford,et al. The risk of a contralateral breast cancer among women diagnosed with ductal and lobular breast carcinoma in situ: data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. , 2003, Breast.
[223] L. Tabár,et al. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening , 2003, The Lancet.
[224] Roman Shyyan,et al. Introduction of Breast Cancer Screening in Chernihiv Oblast in the Ukraine: Report of a PATH Breast Cancer Assistance Program Experience , 2003, The breast journal.
[225] I. Vejborg,et al. Breast cancer incidence after the start of mammography screening in Denmark , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.
[226] D. Stanley. The mammography dilemma. , 2003, Annals of internal medicine.
[227] N. Weiss. Breast Cancer Mortality in Relation to Clinical Breast Examination and Breast Self‐Examination , 2003, The breast journal.
[228] R. Gelber,et al. Systemic treatments for women with breast cancer: outcome with relation to screening for the disease. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[229] H. Freeman,et al. Impact of a cancer screening program on breast cancer stage at diagnosis in a medically underserved urban community. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
[230] William A Hensel,et al. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.
[231] A. Ellis. Breast , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[232] Mammography and beyond: building better breast cancer screening tests. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[233] D. Miglioretti,et al. Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[234] The influence of a false-positive mammogram on a woman's subsequent behaviour for detecting breast cancer. , 2003, European journal of cancer.
[235] Tim Byers,et al. Mammography screening matters for young women with breast carcinoma , 2003, Cancer.
[236] H. Helenius,et al. Significant improvement in breast cancer survival through population-based mammography screening. , 2003, Breast.
[237] Analysis of benefit:risk ratio and mortality reduction for the UK Breast Screening Programme. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.
[238] A. Miller,et al. Why is breast-cancer mortality declining? , 2003, The Lancet. Oncology.
[239] J. Hendriks,et al. Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review , 2003, The Lancet.
[240] A. Hackshaw,et al. EUSOMA review of mammography screening. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[241] A. Verbeek,et al. Evaluation of The Netherlands breast cancer screening programme. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[242] J. Cawson,et al. Counselling interventions to address the psychological consequences of screening mammography: a randomised trial. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.
[243] Truls Østbye,et al. Screening Mammography and Pap Tests Among Older American Women 1996–2000: Results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD) , 2003, The Annals of Family Medicine.
[244] D. Atkins,et al. The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 65 years: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. , 2003, Annals of internal medicine.
[245] C. Bancej,et al. Contribution of clinical breast examination to mammography screening in the early detection of breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of medical screening.
[246] S. Ciatto,et al. Mammography screening in elderly women: efficacy and cost-effectiveness. , 2003, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.
[247] S. Walter. Mammographic screening: case-control studies. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[248] G. Farshid,et al. The use of fine‐needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the assessment of highly suspicious mammographic microcalcifications , 2003, Cancer.
[249] Roy A Jensen,et al. Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Impact of Pathology on Therapeutic Decisions , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[250] A. Jemal,et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[251] Mortality reduction by breast-cancer screening , 2003, The Lancet.
[252] L. Tabár,et al. The relative contributions of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in reducing mortality from the disease. , 2003, European journal of cancer.
[253] P. Sasieni. Evaluation of the UK breast screening programmes. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[254] David Fleiszer,et al. International prospective evaluation of scintimammography with (99m)technetium sestamibi. , 2003, American journal of surgery.
[255] L. Nyström,et al. Service screening with mammography. Long-term effects on breast cancer mortality in the county of Gävleborg, Sweden. , 2003, Breast.
[256] R. Langer,et al. Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial. , 2003, JAMA.
[257] K. Mokbel. Current management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast , 2003, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.
[258] E. Lynge,et al. Reporting of performance indicators of mammography screening in Europe , 2003, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.
[259] Barnett S Kramer,et al. Estimating the Cumulative Risk of a False‐Positive Test in a Repeated Screening Program , 2004, Biometrics.
[260] N Houssami,et al. New technologies in screening for breast cancer: a systematic review of their accuracy , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.
[261] Re: Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[262] K. Emmons,et al. Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[263] P. Gøtzsche. On the benefits and harms of screening for breast cancer. , 2004, International journal of epidemiology.
[264] An academic health center cost analysis of screening mammography , 2004, Cancer.
[265] J. Vestrup,et al. Satisfaction and Anxiety for Women During Investigation of an Abnormal Screening Mammogram , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[266] L Nyström,et al. Early breast cancer deaths in women aged 40-74 years diagnosed during the first 5 years of organised mammography service screening in north Sweden. , 2004, Breast.
[267] M. Manos,et al. Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up? , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[268] W. Satariano,et al. Evaluating a campaign to detect early stage breast tumors in the United States , 2002, European Journal of Epidemiology.
[269] Y. H. Lee,et al. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis and Management of Breast Cancer , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.
[270] L. Rutqvist,et al. Followup after 11 years – update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial , 1997, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[271] S. Hofvind,et al. Do the results of the process indicators in the Norwegian breast cancer screening program predict future mortality reduction from breast cancer? , 2004, Acta oncologica.
[272] J. Elmore,et al. Breast self-examination: who teaches it, who is taught, and how often? (United States) , 2002, Cancer Causes & Control.
[273] Jeffrey C Weinreb,et al. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.
[274] V. Kataja,et al. Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods. , 2004, JAMA.
[275] Emily White,et al. Predictors of Sensitivity of Clinical Breast Examination (CBE) , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[276] M. Morrow. The certainties and the uncertainties of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[277] J. Elmore,et al. Balancing mammography's benefits and harms , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[278] D. Kopans. Mammography screening is saving thousands of lives, but will it survive medical malpractice? , 2004, Radiology.
[279] Teresa To,et al. Mammography benefit in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study‐2: A model evaluation , 2004, International Journal of Cancer.
[280] Overdiagnosis of breast cancer in Denmark , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.
[281] J. Fulton,et al. Mammographic Screening and Disease Presentation of Breast Cancer Patients Who Die of Disease , 2004, The breast journal.
[282] S. Duffy,et al. An audit of assessment procedures in women who develop breast cancer after a negative result , 2004, Journal of medical screening.
[283] MRI better than mammography for detection of breast cancer? , 2004, The Lancet. Oncology.
[284] D. Jeffe,et al. The Full Potential of Breast Cancer Screening Use to Reduce Mortality has not yet been Realized in the United States , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[285] D. Redelmeier,et al. A Comparison of Risk Perception and Psychological Morbidity in Women with Ductal Carcinoma in situ and Early Invasive Breast Cancer , 2003, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[286] Rhian Gabe,et al. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? , 2004, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[287] H. D. de Koning,et al. Impact of screening for breast cancer in high-risk women on health-related quality of life , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.
[288] Richard J. K. Taylor,et al. Mammography Screening and Breast Cancer Mortality in New South Wales, Australia , 2004, Cancer Causes & Control.
[289] L. Tabár,et al. Number needed to screen: lives saved over 20 years of follow-up in mammographic screening , 2004, Journal of medical screening.
[290] Emily White,et al. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[291] C. D'Orsi,et al. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[292] Solveig Hofvind,et al. The cumulative risk of a false‐positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program , 2004, Cancer.
[293] Lower costs of hospital treatment of breast cancer through a population-based mammography screening programme. , 2004, European journal of public health.
[294] Get the facts straight. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[295] G. Farshid,et al. Detection by screening mammography is a powerful independent predictor of survival in women diagnosed with breast cancer. , 2004, Breast.
[296] Jan Mæhlen,et al. Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[297] R Sainsbury. The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Disorders , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.
[298] Daniel Kopans,et al. Clinical Breast Examination: Practical Recommendations for Optimizing Performance and Reporting , 2004, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[299] T. Tuttle,et al. Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[300] J. Hendriks,et al. Breast ultrasound in women with familial risk of breast cancer. , 2004, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.
[301] M. Baum. Commentary: false premises, false promises and false positives--the case against mammographic screening for breast cancer. , 2004, International journal of epidemiology.
[302] Commentary: does screening mammography lead to breast cancer overdiagnosis? , 2004, The journal of the British Menopause Society.
[303] Z. Rayter,et al. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer in screening. , 2004, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.
[304] I. Ellis,et al. Influence of annual mammography from age 40 on breast cancer pathology. , 2004, Human pathology.
[305] V. Semiglazov,et al. The role of breast self-examination in early breast cancer detection (results of the 5-years USSR/WHO randomized study in Leningrad) , 1992, European Journal of Epidemiology.
[306] B. Yankaskas,et al. Screening mammography performance and cancer detection among black women and white women in community practice , 2004, Cancer.
[307] S. Duffy,et al. Overdiagnosis in screening: is the increase in breast cancer incidence rates a cause for concern? , 2004, Journal of medical screening.
[308] Robert A. Goulart,et al. Diagnostic Agreement in the Evaluation of Image-guided Breast Core Needle Biopsies: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[309] A. Thor,et al. A Revised Staging System for Breast Cancer , 2004, The breast journal.
[310] L. Holmberg,et al. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: a New Phenotype Classification System and its Relation to Prognosis , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[311] Margarita L Zuley,et al. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience. , 2004, Radiology.
[312] Martin J Yaffe,et al. What should the burden of proof be for acceptance of a new breast-cancer screening technique? , 2004, The Lancet.
[313] Current dilemmas and future perspectives for breast cancer screening with a focus on optimization of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging by advances in signal processing. , 2004, The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ.
[314] E. Andreopoulou,et al. An overview of the status of imaging screening technology for breast cancer. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[315] Barbara L. Smith,et al. Mammographic screening: Patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival , 2004, Cancer.
[316] Matthijs Oudkerk,et al. First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging , 2000, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[317] S. Harms. Introduction to the International Working Groups on Breast MRI , 2004, The breast journal.
[318] S. Feig,et al. Adverse effects of screening mammography. , 2004, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[319] Mammography studies revisited. , 2004, Minnesota medicine.
[320] Arild Hervik,et al. Mammography screening in Norway: results from the first screening round in four counties and cost-effectiveness of a modeled nationwide screening , 2004, Cancer Causes & Control.
[321] Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age. , 2004, American family physician.
[322] H. D. de Koning,et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.
[323] D. Freedman,et al. On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer. , 2004, International journal of epidemiology.
[324] G. Berglund,et al. No relations between breast cancer risk and fatty acids of erythrocyte membranes in postmenopausal women of the Malmö Diet Cancer cohort (Sweden) , 2004, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
[325] J. Elmore,et al. A population-based study of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy efficacy in women at elevated risk for breast cancer in community practices. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.
[326] L. Tabár,et al. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: Estimates of overdiagnosis from two trials of mammographic screening for breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.
[327] D. Petitti,et al. Saving Women's Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis , 2005 .
[328] K. Faulkner. Mammographic screening: is the benefit worth the risk? , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.
[329] A. McAlearney,et al. Perceptions of insurance coverage for screening mammography among women in need of screening , 2005, Cancer.
[330] I. Henderson,et al. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: Rates of ductal carcinoma in situ: a US perspective , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.
[331] Carmen L. Lewis,et al. Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in the elderly: a review of the evidence. , 2005, The American journal of medicine.
[332] Constantine Gatsonis,et al. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Cancer.
[333] P. Carney,et al. Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[334] C. Baines. Are There Downsides to Mammography Screening? , 2005, The breast journal.
[335] H. D. de Koning,et al. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: Microsimulation modelling estimates based on observed screen and clinical data , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.
[336] Sarah M. Greene,et al. Race and ethnicity: comparing medical records to self-reports. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[337] Informed consent for mammography screening: modelling the risks and benefits for American women , 2005, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.
[338] Nico Karssemeijer,et al. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[339] A. Berrington de González,et al. Mammographic screening before age 50 years in the UK: comparison of the radiation risks with the mortality benefits , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.
[340] T. Peretz,et al. Effect of breast magnetic resonance imaging on the clinical management of breast cancer. , 2005, The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ.
[341] G. Eklund,et al. Randomized study of mammography screening — preliminary report on mortality in the stockholm trial , 1991, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[342] David Ruppert,et al. Assessing the Skill of Yes/No Predictions , 2005, Biometrics.
[343] W. Dupont,et al. The natural history of low‐grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women treated by biopsy only revealed over 30 years of long‐term follow‐up , 2005, Cancer.
[344] I. Tannock,et al. Fatigue, menopausal symptoms, and cognitive function in women after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: 1- and 2-year follow-up of a prospective controlled study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[345] G Verdú,et al. Use of risk projection models to estimate mortality and incidence from radiation-induced breast cancer in screening programs , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.
[346] Angela Fagerlin,et al. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[347] P. Kronqvist,et al. Population-based mammography screening results in substantial savings in treatment costs for fatal breast cancer , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[348] New techniques for mammography screening: advantages and limitations. , 2005, Missouri medicine.
[349] A R Padhani,et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) , 2005, The Lancet.
[350] P. Kronqvist,et al. Mammographic screening reduces risk of breast carcinoma recurrence , 2005, Cancer.
[351] S. Feig. Screening Mammography Controversies: Resolved, Partly Resolved, and Unresolved , 2005, The breast journal.
[352] Russell P. Harris. Effectiveness: the next question for breast cancer screening. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[353] Elizabeth A Morris,et al. Determination of the Presence and Extent of Pure Ductal Carcinoma in Situ by Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, The breast journal.
[354] D. Axelrod,et al. Evaluation of pathways for progression of heterogeneous breast tumors. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.
[355] Yu Shen,et al. Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[356] Debra M Ikeda,et al. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. , 2005, Radiology.
[357] D. Berry,et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer , 2005 .
[358] J. Austoker,et al. The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review , 2005, Psycho-oncology.
[359] MRI in breast cancer management: potential for benefit and harm. , 2005, International journal of fertility and women's medicine.
[360] J. Baum,et al. Relaxation techniques for reducing pain and anxiety during screening mammography. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[361] E. Mendelson,et al. Incorporating new imaging models in breast cancer management , 2005, Current treatment options in oncology.
[362] S. Moss,et al. Randomised controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40: predicted mortality based on surrogate outcome measures , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.
[363] Breast cancer screening for women aged 40 to 49 years--what does the evidence mean for New Zealand? , 2005, The New Zealand medical journal.
[364] Les Irwig,et al. Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[365] D. Ghersi,et al. Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[366] Deborah Schrag,et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[367] N. Day. Overdiagnosis and breast cancer screening , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.
[368] S. Ciatto,et al. Quality assessment of the mammographic screening programme in the Azienda Sanitaria locale Provincia Milano 1 -- analysis of interval cancers and discussion of possible causes of diagnostic error. , 2005, La Radiologia medica.
[369] Geographic association between mammography use and mortality reduction in the US , 2005, Cancer Causes & Control.
[370] J. Elmore,et al. Efficacy of prophylactic mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer: a cancer research network project. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[371] S. Moss. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: Overdiagnosis in randomised controlled trials of breast cancer screening , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.
[372] A. Fagerlin,et al. Patterns and correlates of local therapy for women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[373] J. Elmore,et al. Screening clinical breast examination: how often does it miss lethal breast cancer? , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[374] D. Tripathy. Targeted Therapies in Breast Cancer , 2005, The breast journal.
[375] Kenneth G A Gilhuijs,et al. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions on MR images: potential effect of computerized assessment on clinical reading. , 2005, Radiology.
[376] S. Tyldesley,et al. Comparison of 1- and 2-year screening intervals for women undergoing screening mammography , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.
[377] C. D'Orsi,et al. Community-based mammography practice: services, charges, and interpretation methods. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[378] Missed breast cancer: the legal factors. , 2005, Journal of law and medicine.
[379] F. Mebane,et al. News Media Coverage of a Women's Health Controversy: How Newspapers and TV Outlets Covered a Recent Debate Over Screening Mammography , 2005, Women & health.
[380] G. Colditz,et al. Outcome of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ untreated after diagnostic biopsy , 2005, Cancer.
[381] Elsebeth Lynge,et al. Breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen after introduction of mammography screening: cohort study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[382] Gary R Cutter,et al. Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States. , 2005, Radiology.
[383] S. Fletcher,et al. Information and involvement preferences of women in their 40s before their first screening mammogram. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.
[384] H. Bartelink,et al. Long‐term outcome after breast‐conservation treatment with radiation for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast , 2005, Cancer.
[385] Simulation of Begin and End Ages for Mammography Screening , 2005, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.
[386] [MRI for breast disease diagnosis; an asset, but the proper place has to be determined first]. , 2005, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.
[387] M. J. van de Vijver. Biological variables and prognosis of DCIS. , 2005, Breast.
[388] David Gur,et al. Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice. , 2005, Radiology.
[389] Giovanni Parmigiani,et al. A Model-Based Comparison of Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: Mammograms and Clinical Breast Examinations , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.
[390] B. Viták,et al. Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program. , 2005, Radiology.
[391] P. Taylor,et al. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. , 2005, Radiology.
[392] S. Duffy. Some current issues in breast cancer screening , 2005, Journal of medical screening.
[393] S. Duffy,et al. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in service screening , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.
[394] Julie David,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: current indications. , 2005, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.
[395] R. Fimmers,et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[396] Bircan Erbas,et al. The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[397] K. Malone,et al. Age-Specific Incidence Rates of In situ Breast Carcinomas by Histologic Type, 1980 to 2001 , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.
[398] K. Holli,et al. Follow-up Cost of Breast Cancer Patients with Localized Disease After Primary Treatment: a Randomized Trial , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[399] J. Reynolds,et al. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[400] Emily White,et al. The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[401] E. Pisano,et al. Imaging and cancer: research strategy of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network. , 2005, Radiology.
[402] Sarah M. Greene,et al. Efficacy of breast cancer screening in the community according to risk level. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[403] S. Moss,et al. Randomised controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40: results of screening in the first 10 years , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.
[404] A. Miller,et al. Breast screening in the emerging world: high prevalence of breast cancer in Cairo. , 2005, Breast.
[405] Rongwei Fu,et al. Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[406] C. Y. Wang,et al. Estrogen-plus-progestin use and mammographic density in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative randomized trial. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[407] A. Bradbury,et al. The case for individualized screening recommendations for breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[408] E. Morris,et al. Results of MRI Screening for Breast Cancer in High-Risk Patients with LCIS and Atypical Hyperplasia , 2007, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[409] Karla Kerlikowske,et al. Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium , 2006, Cancer.
[410] L. Esserman,et al. Applying the neoadjuvant paradigm to ductal carcinoma in situ , 2006, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[411] V. Tsikitis,et al. Biology of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Classification Based on Biologic Potential , 2006, American journal of clinical oncology.
[412] Jennifer Cullen,et al. The SPECTRUM population model of the impact of screening and treatment on U.S. breast cancer trends from 1975 to 2000: principles and practice of the model methods. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[413] Anne J. Kearney. Increasing Our Understanding of Breast Self-Examination: Women Talk About Cancer, the Health Care System, and Being Women , 2006, Qualitative health research.
[414] J. Elmore,et al. Specificity of Clinical Breast Examination in Community Practice , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.
[415] S. Ciatto,et al. Minority report – false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[416] R. Coombes,et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomised trial designed to determine the need for irradiation following conservative surgery for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[417] K. Mokbel,et al. Heterogeneity of ductal carcinoma in situ and its effects on management. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.
[418] Effect of Screening Mammography on the Surgery of Breast Cancer in Finland: A Population-Based Analysis during the Years 1985–2004 , 2006, The American surgeon.
[419] P. Glynn,et al. A stochastic simulation model of U.S. breast cancer mortality trends from 1975 to 2000. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[420] E. Feuer. Modeling the impact of adjuvant therapy and screening mammography on U.S. breast cancer mortality between 1975 and 2000: introduction to the problem. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[421] H. Helenius,et al. Service screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality among elderly women in Turku , 2006, Journal of medical screening.
[422] C. Cardinez,et al. United States cancer statistics; 2003 incidence and mortality , 2006 .
[423] T. Ali,et al. Evaluation of efficacy of self breast examination for breast cancer prevention: a cost effective screening tool. , 2006, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.
[424] I. Vejborg,et al. Performance of combined clinical mammography and needle biopsy: a nationwide study from Denmark , 2006, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.
[425] S. Moss,et al. Radiological findings of screen-detected cancers in a multi-centre randomized, controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40 to 48 years. , 2006, Clinical radiology.
[426] Ingvar Andersson,et al. Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[427] B. Hickey,et al. Sequencing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy for early breast cancer. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[428] J. Mæhlen,et al. Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: Definition of overdiagnosis is confusing in follow-up of Malmö trial , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[429] Elizabeth A Morris,et al. Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[430] G. Ursin,et al. Association of new-onset breast discomfort with an increase in mammographic density during hormone therapy. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.
[431] L. Tabár,et al. Reduction in Breast Cancer Mortality from the Organised Service Screening with Mammography: 2. Validation with Alternative Analytic Methods , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.
[432] T. Vehmas,et al. Effect of computer-aided detection on mammographic performance: experimental study on readers with different levels of experience , 2006, Acta radiologica.
[433] T. Lash,et al. Reduced Mortality Rate Associated with Annual Mammograms after Breast Cancer Therapy , 2006, The breast journal.
[434] K. Ohnuki,et al. Cost‐effectiveness analysis of screening modalities for breast cancer in Japan with special reference to women aged 40–49 years , 2006, Cancer science.
[435] S. Ciatto,et al. Quality Control of Mammography Screening in the Veneto Region. Evaluation of Four Programs at a Local Health Unit Level - Analysis of the Frequency and Diagnostic Pattern of Interval Cancers , 2006, Tumori.
[436] J. Hilden,et al. Performance of clinical mammography: A nationwide study from Denmark , 2006, International journal of cancer.
[437] S. Duffy,et al. Audit of negative assessments in a breast-screening programme in women who later develop breast cancer-implications for survival. , 2006, Breast.
[438] S. Feig. Screening mammography: a successful public health initiative. , 2006, Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health.
[439] Maureen A Smith,et al. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[440] I. Chew,et al. Cytology is useful in breast screening: results and long‐term follow‐up of the Singapore Breast Screening Pilot Project , 2006, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.
[441] D. Bowen,et al. Effects of Breast Cancer Risk Counseling for Sexual Minority Women , 2006, Health care for women international.
[442] J. Otten,et al. Cost-effectiveness of different reading and referral strategies in mammography screening in the Netherlands , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[443] S. Duffy,et al. Some issues in screening for breast and other cancers. , 2006, Journal of medical screening.
[444] H. Le‐Petross. Breast MRI as a screening tool: the appropriate role. , 2006, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.
[445] H. Møller,et al. Over-diagnosis in breast cancer screening , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[446] D. Keating,et al. Clinical breast examination in a comprehensive breast cancer screening program: contribution and cost. , 2006, Radiology.
[447] Michael Waller,et al. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial , 2006, The Lancet.
[448] S. Rosso,et al. Estimate of overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography after adjustment for lead time. A service screening study in Italy , 2006, Breast Cancer Research.
[449] Paola Pisani,et al. Outcome of screening by clinical examination of the breast in a trial in the Philippines , 2006, International journal of cancer.
[450] H. Iwase,et al. [Breast cancer]. , 2006, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.
[451] J. Cuzick,et al. The prevention, detection, and management of breast cancer , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.
[452] Sarah M. Greene,et al. Impact of IRB requirements on a multicenter survey of prophylactic mastectomy outcomes. , 2006, Annals of epidemiology.
[453] Karla Kerlikowske,et al. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. , 2006, Radiology.
[454] S. Duffy,et al. Overdiagnosis, Sojourn Time, and Sensitivity in the Copenhagen Mammography Screening Program , 2006, The breast journal.
[455] Gisella Gennaro,et al. Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography , 2006, European Radiology.
[456] Carmel Hayes,et al. A test of performance of breast MRI interpretation in a multicentre screening study. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.
[457] Barbara L. Smith,et al. Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Women ≤ 40 versus 50 to 60 Years: Increasing Size and Stage Disparity Compared With Older Women Over Time , 2006, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[458] G. Lyman,et al. Screening mammography at 40–49 years: regret or no regret? , 2006, The Lancet.
[459] P. Gøtzsche. Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: Overdiagnosis in the Malmö trial was considerably underestimated , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[460] L. Tabár,et al. Tumor Size and Breast Cancer Detection: What Might Be the Effect of a Less Sensitive Screening Tool Than Mammography? , 2006, The breast journal.
[461] C. D'Orsi,et al. Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .
[462] Lurdes Y. T. Inoue,et al. Modeling the impact of treatment and screening on U.S. breast cancer mortality: a Bayesian approach. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[463] J. Elmore,et al. Breast self-examination: self-reported frequency, quality, and associated outcomes. , 2006, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.
[464] G. Osborn,et al. Is general practitioner access to breast imaging safe? , 2006, Clinical radiology.
[465] J. Jones,et al. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ: the pathological perspective , 2006, Breast Cancer Research.
[466] X. Castells,et al. Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme , 2006, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
[467] P. Møller,et al. Screening mammography and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a case-control study. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.
[468] P. Giorgi Rossi,et al. The effect of screening programmes on the treatment of benign breast neoplasms: observations from current practice in Italy , 2006, Journal of medical screening.
[469] Garnet L Anderson,et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogens on breast cancer and mammography screening in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy. , 2006, JAMA.
[470] The trade-off between population and individual benefit of screening. , 2006, Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung.
[471] V. Beral,et al. Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future , 2006, Journal of medical screening.
[472] J. Elmore,et al. Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms , 2001, Journal of General Internal Medicine.
[473] A. Whittemore,et al. Medical radiation exposure and breast cancer risk: Findings from the Breast Cancer Family Registry , 2007, International journal of cancer.
[474] N. Boyd,et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.
[475] S. Ciatto. Real time reading in mammography breast screening , 2007, La radiologia medica.
[476] Estimating net benefits and harms of screening mammography in women age 40 to 49 years. , 2007, Annals of internal medicine.
[477] Michael J Schell,et al. Evidence-based target recall rates for screening mammography. , 2007, Radiology.
[478] W. Heindel,et al. Digital mammography screening: average glandular dose and first performance parameters. , 2007, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.
[479] C. D'Orsi,et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.
[480] Eric J Feuer,et al. The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.
[481] Noel T Brewer,et al. Systematic Review: The Long-Term Effects of False-Positive Mammograms , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[482] Douglas K Owens,et al. Screening Mammography for Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[483] A. Detsky,et al. Relevance of cost-effectiveness analysis to clinicians and policy makers. , 2007, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
[484] Manfred S. Green,et al. Routine screening mammography in women older than 74 years: a review of the available data. , 2007, Maturitas.
[485] T. Lash,et al. Mammography surveillance and mortality in older breast cancer survivors. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[486] Sankey V. Williams,et al. Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[487] Robert A. Smith,et al. The evolving role of MRI in the detection and evaluation of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.
[488] G. Lyman,et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: a review of recent advances , 2007, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.
[489] M. Yaffe,et al. American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007 .
[490] E. Paci,et al. Breast Cancer Diagnostic Methods: Screen-Detected and Clinical Cases. An Italian Survey of Women's Experiences , 2007, Tumori.
[491] J. Bulliard,et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality-controlled mammography screening program from the Swiss statutory health-care perspective: quantitative assessment of the most influential factors. , 2007, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[492] Mammographic screening from age 40 years , 2007, The Lancet.
[493] Russell Harris,et al. Using an office system intervention to increase breast cancer screening , 1998, Journal of General Internal Medicine.
[494] P. Skaane,et al. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[495] C. Gatsonis,et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.
[496] G. Maddern,et al. NATIONAL BREAST CANCER AUDIT: DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND , 2007, ANZ journal of surgery.
[497] S. Moss,et al. Radiological and pathological findings of interval cancers in a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40-41 years. , 2007, Clinical radiology.
[498] J. Elmore,et al. Breast cancer screening use by African Americans and whites in an HMO , 2000, Journal of General Internal Medicine.
[499] Wendie A Berg,et al. Beyond standard mammographic screening: mammography at age extremes, ultrasound, and MR imaging. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[500] Eun Sook Ko,et al. MRI of the Breast for the Detection and Assessment of the Size of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ , 2007, Korean journal of radiology.
[501] G. Hortobagyi,et al. Mammography before diagnosis among women age 80 years and older with breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[502] E. Pisano,et al. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.
[503] H. D. de Koning,et al. Breast cancer screening: Evidence for false reassurance? , 2008, International journal of cancer.
[504] E. Paci,et al. Evaluation of service mammography screening impact in Italy. The contribution of hazard analysis. , 2008, European journal of cancer.
[505] Jean B. Cormack,et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. , 2008, JAMA.