Screening for Breast Cancer: Systematic Evidence Review Update for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force

Background This systematic review is an update of evidence since the 2002 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on breast cancer screening.

[1]  Keeping abreast. , 1968, American journal of pharmacy and the sciences supporting public health.

[2]  J. Farrow.  The James Ewing lecture current concepts in the detection and treatment of the earliest of the early breast cancers , 1970 .

[3]  R. Millis,et al.  In situ intraduct carcinoma of the breast: A long term follow‐up study , 1975, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  R. E. Snyder,et al.  Prospective study of non‐infiltrating carcinoma of the breast , 1977, Cancer.

[5]  P. Rosen,et al.  Intraductal carcinoma. Long-term follow-up after treatment by biopsy alone. , 1978 .

[6]  C. Fox,et al.  Breast-cancer screening. , 1979, Lancet.

[7]  P. Rosen,et al.  The clinical significance of pre‐invasive breast carcinoma , 1980, Cancer.

[8]  E. Trell.  Community-based preventive medical department for individual risk factor assessment and intervention in an urban population. , 1983, Preventive medicine.

[9]  H. Vorherr.  Pathobiology of breast cancer--treatment implications. , 1984, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[10]  L. Tabár,et al.  REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY Randomised Trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare , 1985, The Lancet.

[11]  W. Odling-Smee,et al.  Screening for Breast Cancer , 1985, The Lancet.

[12]  Mammographic breast cancer screening--a randomized trial in Malmö, Sweden. , 1985, Maturitas.

[13]  S Shapiro,et al.  Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the Health Insurance Plan Study: a randomized trial with breast cancer screening. , 1985, National Cancer Institute monograph.

[14]  S. Fletcher,et al.  Clinical breast examination. , 1986, Hospital practice.

[15]  J. Habbema,et al.  Age-specific reduction in breast cancer mortality by screening: an analysis of the results of the Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York study. , 1986, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  S. Paik,et al.  Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol 6). I. Intraductal carcinoma (DCIS) , 1986 .

[17]  V. Semiglazov,et al.  Breast self-examination for the early detection of breast cancer: a USSR/WHO controlled trial in Leningrad. , 1987, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[18]  T. Landberg,et al.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. , 1988, BMJ.

[19]  S. Schnitt,et al.  In situ carcinoma of the breast. , 1989, Annual review of medicine.

[20]  L. Tabár,et al.  The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit. , 1989, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[21]  I. Fentiman.  The treatment of in situ breast cancer. , 1989, Acta oncologica.

[22]  A. Huggins,et al.  Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years , 1990, The Lancet.

[23]  D. Weaver,et al.  Alternatives in the surgical management of in situ breast cancer. A meta-analysis of outcome. , 1990, The American surgeon.

[24]  M. Spittle.  The management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 1990, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[25]  C. Redmond,et al.  Conservative management of intraductal carcinoma (DCIS) of the breast , 1991, Journal of surgical oncology.

[26]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[27]  J. Hollenberg,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening for Elderly Women with and without Comorbid Conditions , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[28]  Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for intraductal carcinoma of the breast. , 1992, The Journal of the Florida Medical Association.

[29]  M. Morrow.  Pre-cancerous breast lesions: implications for breast cancer prevention trials. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  A. Miller,et al.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[31]  A. Miller,et al.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[32]  S. Wall,et al.  Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials , 1993, The Lancet.

[33]  V. Semiglazov,et al.  Study of the role of breast self-examination in the reduction of mortality from breast cancer. The Russian Federation/World Health Organization Study. , 1993, European journal of cancer.

[34]  A. Richardson,et al.  The effectiveness of breast cancer screening by mammography in younger women. , 1993, The Online journal of current clinical trials.

[35]  B. Muir,et al.  The Edinburgh randomised trial of breast cancer screening: results after 10 years of follow-up. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[36]  P. Stomper,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: the mammographer's perspective. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  W. Dupont,et al.  Continued local recurrence of carcinoma 15–25 years after a diagnosis of low grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated only by biopsy , 1995, Cancer.

[38]  M. Morrow.  The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ. Implications for clinical decision making , 1995, Cancer.

[39]  M. Broussard,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. , 1995, Radiologic technology.

[40]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40–49 years: Current evidence from randomized controlled trials , 1995, Cancer.

[41]  L. Tabár,et al.  Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results swedish two‐county trial , 1995, Cancer.

[42]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 1996, JAMA.

[43]  J. Hendriks,et al.  Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: Evidence for a reduction in breast cancer mortality , 1996, International journal of cancer.

[44]  F. Alexander,et al.  The Edinburgh Randomized Trial of Breast Cancer Screening. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[45]  J. Boyages,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ. Part I: Definition and diagnosis. , 1997, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[46]  J. Boyages,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ. Part 2: Treatment. , 1997, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[47]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[48]  J. Frisell,et al.  The Stockholm Mammographic Screening Trial: Risks and benefits in age group 40-49 years. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[49]  D. Ransohoff,et al.  Lessons from the Mammography Screening Controversy: Can We Improve the Debate? , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[50]  L Nyström,et al.  Updated overview of the Swedish Randomized Trials on Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography: age group 40-49 at randomization. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[51]  B. Cox.  Variation in the effectiveness of breast screening by year of follow-up. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[52]  S. Self,et al.  Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: methodology and preliminary results. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[53]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[54]  I Andersson,et al.  Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmö Mammographic Screening Program. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[55]  C J Baines,et al.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: update on breast cancer mortality. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[56]  R. Harris.  Variation of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening with age. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[57]  J. Earp,et al.  Race and mammography use in two North Carolina counties. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[58]  L. Tabár,et al.  Recent results from the Swedish Two-County Trial: the effects of age, histologic type, and mode of detection on the efficacy of breast cancer screening. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[59]  S. Duffy,et al.  The Gothenburg Breast Cancer Screening Trial: preliminary results on breast cancer mortality for women aged 39-49. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[60]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Efficacy of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years: comparison of relative and absolute benefit. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[61]  B. Macmahon,et al.  Randomization in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a review for evidence of subversion. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[62]  R E Hendrick,et al.  Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40-49 years. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[63]  M. Fishbein.  False positive rate of screening mammography. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[64]  D. Berry,et al.  Benefits and risks of screening mammography for women in their forties: a statistical appraisal. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[65]  A. Mushlin,et al.  Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[66]  C J Baines,et al.  The Gothenburg breast screening trial , 1997, Cancer.

[67]  J. Elmore,et al.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[68]  S. Moss.  A trial to study the effect on breast cancer mortality of annual mammographic screening in women starting at age 40 , 1999, Journal of medical screening.

[69]  J. Elmore,et al.  Breast Symptoms among Women Enrolled in a Health Maintenance Organization: Frequency, Evaluation, and Outcome , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[70]  W. Hepburn,et al.  14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening , 1999, The Lancet.

[71]  S. Dobie,et al.  Prophylactic mastectomy for prevention of breast cancer. , 1999, The Journal of family practice.

[72]  S. Fletcher,et al.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? , 1999, JAMA.

[73]  Update of the Swedish Two-County Trial of breast cancer screening: histologic grade-specific and age-specific results. , 1999, Swiss surgery = Schweizer Chirurgie = Chirurgie suisse = Chirurgia svizzera.

[74]  L. Smeeth,et al.  Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analyses—sometimes informative, usually misleading , 1999, BMJ.

[75]  L. Esserman,et al.  Management of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 1999, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[76]  S. Cummings,et al.  Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years: impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness. , 1999, JAMA.

[77]  J. Boyages,et al.  Predictors of local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: a meta-analysis. , 1999, Cancer.

[78]  H. Welch,et al.  US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey. , 2000, BMJ.

[79]  C. Carter,et al.  Breast cancer attitudes, knowledge, and screening behavior in women with and without a family history of breast cancer. , 2000, Health care for women international.

[80]  Screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[81]  M. Sasa,et al.  Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan. , 2000, Anticancer research.

[82]  J. Randal.  After 40 years, mammography remains as much emotion as science. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[83]  Decision analysis for the cost effectiveness of sestamibi scintimammography in minimizing unnecessary biopsies. , 2000, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[84]  C. Catzavelos.  Part III. The pathobiology of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2000, Current problems in cancer.

[85]  L. J. van der Kamp,et al.  False-positive findings in mammography screening induces short-term distress - breast cancer-specific concern prevails longer. , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[86]  M. Overgaard,et al.  Myocardial perfusion imaging in breast cancer patients treated with or without post-mastectomy radiotherapy. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[87]  Effect of screening programme on mortality from breast cancer. Investment in treatment would be more cost effective. , 2000, BMJ.

[88]  J. Mayer,et al.  Rates and correlates of discomfort associated with mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[89]  H. D. de Koning.  Breast cancer screening; cost-effective in practice? , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[90]  Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) eight‐year update of protocol B‐17 , 2000, Cancer.

[91]  R. Blanks,et al.  Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990-8: comparison of observed with predicted mortality , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[92]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[93]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[94]  Does mammography add any benefit to a thorough clinical breast examination (CBE)? , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[95]  L. Nyström.  Screening mammography re-evaluated , 2000, The Lancet.

[96]  S. Feig,et al.  An introduction to economic issues in breast imaging. , 2000, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[97]  A. Miller,et al.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[98]  L. Nyström,et al.  How effective is screening for breast cancer? , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[99]  R. Warren,et al.  Interval cancers as an indicator of perfomance in breast screening , 2000, Breast cancer.

[100]  K. Lee,et al.  Clinical breast examination for screening of asymptomatic women: the importance of clinical breast examination for breast cancer detection. , 2000, Yonsei medical journal.

[101]  Mette Cathrine Lauridsen,et al.  Physiotherapy treatment of late symptoms following surgical treatment of breast cancer. , 2000, Breast.

[102]  G. Sakorafas,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: evolving perspectives. , 2000, Cancer treatment reviews.

[103]  Peter C Gøtzsche,et al.  Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? , 2000, The Lancet.

[104]  J. Lamb,et al.  Pathology characteristics that optimize outcome prediction of a breast screening trial , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[105]  D. Gyrd-Hansen,et al.  Cost implications of routine mammography screening of women 50-69 years in the county of Funen, Denmark. , 2000, Health policy.

[106]  K. Eriksson,et al.  Long‐term outcome of the Malmö Preventive Project: mortality and cardiovascular morbidity , 2000, Journal of internal medicine.

[107]  L. Esserman,et al.  Integration of breast imaging into cancer management , 2000, Current oncology reports.

[108]  A framework for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of MRI screening for breast cancer , 2000, European Radiology.

[109]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[110]  Reporting of screening results , 2000, Journal of medical screening.

[111]  J. Overgaard,et al.  Late treatment-related morbidity in breast cancer patients randomized to postmastectomy radiotherapy and systemic treatment versus systemic treatment alone. , 1999, Acta oncologica.

[112]  L. Nyström,et al.  Service screening with mammography in Sweden--evaluation of effects of screening on breast cancer mortality in age group 40-49 years. , 2000, Acta oncologica.

[113]  L. Tabár,et al.  The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up. , 2000, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[114]  W. Black,et al.  When should we stop screening? , 2000, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[115]  David Atkins,et al.  Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2001 .

[116]  M D Schnall,et al.  MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. , 2001, Radiology.

[117]  L. Walter,et al.  Screening mammography for frail older women: what are the burdens? , 2001, Journal of general internal medicine.

[118]  L. Tabár,et al.  Beyond randomized controlled trials , 2001, Cancer.

[119]  P. Dempsey,et al.  Reducing the cost of diagnosis of breast carcinoma , 2001, Cancer.

[120]  M. Schooff,et al.  Is breast self-examination an effective screening measure for breast cancer? , 2001, The Journal of family practice.

[121]  D. Wickerham,et al.  Ductal carcinoma-in-situ. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[122]  D. Carter,et al.  Breast carcinoma in situ: risk factors and screening patterns. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[123]  D K Wagener,et al.  Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[124]  G. Noël,et al.  [Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853]. , 2001, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.

[125]  J. Bergh,et al.  Short- and long-term anxiety and depression in women recalled after breast cancer screening. , 2001, European journal of cancer.

[126]  J. Costantino,et al.  Tamoxifen and depression: more evidence from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project's Breast Cancer Prevention (P-1) Randomized Study. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[127]  N. Baxter.  Preventive health care, 2001 update: should women be routinely taught breast self-examination to screen for breast cancer? , 2001, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[128]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Histological type and marker expression of the primary tumour compared with its local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[129]  Peter C Gøtzsche,et al.  Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography , 2001, The Lancet.

[130]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  False-negative breast screening assessment: what lessons can we learn? , 2001, Clinical radiology.

[131]  Breast screening--time for review. , 2001, The New Zealand medical journal.

[132]  S. Sutton,et al.  False positive results do not have a negative effect on reattendance for subsequent breast screening , 2001, Journal of medical screening.

[133]  R. Demicheli,et al.  Breast cancer screening for women aged 40-49 years: screening may not be the benign process usually thought. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[134]  D. Faverly,et al.  Accuracy of frozen section diagnoses of breast lesions after introduction of a national programme in mammographic screening , 2001, Histopathology.

[135]  E. Fishell,et al.  In Situ Duct Carcinoma of the Breast: Clinical and Histopathologic Factors and Association with Recurrent Carcinoma , 2001, The breast journal.

[136]  Pros and cons of mammographic screening , 2001, Journal of surgical oncology.

[137]  L. Nyström,et al.  Service screening with mammography of women aged 50–69 years in Sweden: effects on mortality from breast cancer , 2001, Journal of medical screening.

[138]  C. Drossaert,et al.  Does mammographic screening and a negative result affect attitudes towards future breast screening? , 2001, Journal of medical screening.

[139]  I. Ellis,et al.  Screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): overdiagnosis or an obligate precursor of invasive disease? , 2001, Journal of medical screening.

[140]  Screening Mammography: Is It Suitably Targeted to Older Women Who are Most Likely to Benefit? , 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[141]  L. Walter,et al.  Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. , 2001, JAMA.

[142]  G. Vlastos,et al.  MR imaging: breast cancer staging and screening. , 2001, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[143]  Study of radiation induced cancers in a breast screening programme. , 2001, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[144]  B. V. VON Schoultz,et al.  Mammographic breast density during hormone replacement therapy: effects of continuous combination, unopposed transdermal and low-potency estrogen regimens , 2001, Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society.

[145]  L Duchateau,et al.  Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[146]  [Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: costs and efficiency]. , 2001, Onkologie.

[147]  G. Schwartz.  The Current Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ , 2001, The breast journal.

[148]  E. Burnside,et al.  The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States. , 2001, Clinical breast cancer.

[149]  K. Lindfors,et al.  False-positive screening mammograms: effect of immediate versus later work-up on patient stress. , 2001, Radiology.

[150]  A. Miller.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography , 2001, The Lancet.

[151]  Aspects in mammographic screening. Detection, prediction, recurrence and prognosis. , 2001, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.

[152]  C. Mulrow,et al.  Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[153]  T. Perneger,et al.  Misconceptions about efficacy of mammography screening: a public health dilemma , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[154]  R. Warren,et al.  Screening women at high risk of breast cancer on the basis of evidence. , 2001, European journal of radiology.

[155]  E. Winer,et al.  Knowledge, satisfaction, and perceived cancer risk among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2001, Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine.

[156]  S. Narod,et al.  Re: Canadian national breast screening study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[157]  M. Hakama,et al.  Programme sensitivity and effectiveness of mammography service screening in Helsinki, Finland , 2002, Journal of medical screening.

[158]  Roberta M Ray,et al.  Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[159]  L. Tabár,et al.  All-cause mortality among breast cancer patients in a screening trial: support for breast cancer mortality as an end point , 2002, Journal of medical screening.

[160]  V. Beral,et al.  Predictors of outcome of mammography in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme , 2002, Journal of medical screening.

[161]  Ralph Gonzales,et al.  Public Expectations and Attitudes for Annual Physical Examinations and Testing , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[162]  S. Singletary,et al.  Standard for the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast (DCIS) , 2002, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[163]  R. Warren,et al.  What is the recall rate of breast MRI when used for screening asymptomatic women at high risk? , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[164]  D. Haggstrom,et al.  All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[165]  A. Berg,et al.  Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[166]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[167]  T. To,et al.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: Breast Cancer Mortality after 11 to 16 Years of Follow-up: A Randomized Screening Trial of Mammography in Women Age 40 to 49 Years , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[168]  M. Frankenberg-Schwager,et al.  Enhanced Neoplastic Transformation by Mammography X Rays Relative to 200 kVp X Rays: Indication for a Strong Dependence on Photon Energy of the RBEM for Various End Points , 2002, Radiation research.

[169]  J. Law,et al.  Concerning the relationship between benefit and radiation risk, and cancers detected and induced, in a breast screening programme. , 2002, The British journal of radiology.

[170]  T. Kazerooni,et al.  Assessment of a breast cancer screening programme in Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran. , 2002, Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit.

[171]  H. Cody.  Current surgical management of breast cancer , 2002, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[172]  Teaching breast self-examination in developing countries does not reduce breast cancer deaths. , 2002, Report on medical guidelines & outcomes research.

[173]  J. Elmore,et al.  Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[174]  L. Liberman,et al.  Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[175]  R. Young,et al.  A breast cancer education and on-site screening intervention for unscreened African American women. , 2002, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[176]  Sara Godward,et al.  Impact of false-positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer , 2002, Breast Cancer Research.

[177]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[178]  S. Woolf,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[179]  S. Feig.  Current status of screening mammography. , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[180]  S. Plevritis,et al.  Ethical issues in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging screening for breast cancer. , 2002, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[181]  Benefits, harms and costs of screening mammography in women 70 years and over: a systematic review , 2002, The Medical journal of Australia.

[182]  K. Cheng.  Update on effects of screening mammography , 2002, The Lancet.

[183]  H. Hussain,et al.  How significant is detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in a breast screening programme? , 2002, Clinical radiology.

[184]  Ingvar Andersson,et al.  Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials , 2002, The Lancet.

[185]  V. Jackson.  Screening mammography: controversies and headlines. , 2002, Radiology.

[186]  The evaluation of women with familial risk of breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[187]  R. Warren,et al.  Is breast MRI ever useful in a mammographic screening programme? , 2002, Clinical radiology.

[188]  M O Leach,et al.  The UK national study of magnetic resonance imaging as a method of screening for breast cancer (MARIBS). , 2002, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[189]  F. O'Malley,et al.  The Role of HER2/neu Overexpression/Amplification in the Progression of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Carcinoma of the Breast , 2002, Modern Pathology.

[190]  Is it worth screening women over 70 for breast cancer — or indeed any women? , 2002, The Medical journal of Australia.

[191]  M Baum,et al.  First results from the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS-I): a randomised prevention trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[192]  Experts at odds over mammography , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[193]  The evidence to support mammography screening. , 2002, The Netherlands journal of medicine.

[194]  F. Vicini,et al.  Age at diagnosis and outcome for women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast: a critical review of the literature. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[195]  Evis Sala,et al.  The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial , 2003, Cancer.

[196]  False-Positive Result and Reattendance in the Ontario Breast Screening Program , 2003, Journal of medical screening.

[197]  W. Thompson,et al.  Does screen-detected breast cancer have better survival than symptomatic breast cancer? , 2003, Asian journal of surgery.

[198]  Alfons G H Kessels,et al.  The additional diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[199]  H. D. de Koning.  Mammographic screening: evidence from randomised controlled trials. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[200]  L. Tabár,et al.  Mammography and breast cancer: the new era , 2003, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[201]  C. Baines.  Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent? , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[202]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[203]  P. Boyle.  Global summit on mammographic screening. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[204]  C. Baines.  Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent? (Countering the counterpoint). , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[205]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[206]  S. Gapstur,et al.  Mujeres felices por ser saludables: a breast cancer risk reduction program for Latino women. , 2003, Preventive Medicine.

[207]  Ahmedin Jemal,et al.  Trends in Breast Cancer by Race and Ethnicity , 2003, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[208]  Acog.  ACOG practice bulletin Breast Cancer Screening , 2003, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[209]  E. A. Paul,et al.  Breast self-examination and death from breast cancer: a meta-analysis , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[210]  G. Bucht,et al.  False‐Negative Cases of Breast Cancer Deaths in Mammography Screening Evaluations , 2003, The breast journal.

[211]  L. Nyström,et al.  Service screening with mammography of women aged 70-74 years in Sweden. Effects on breast cancer mortality. , 2003, Cancer detection and prevention.

[212]  Daniel B Kopans,et al.  The most recent breast cancer screening controversy about whether mammographic screening benefits women at any age: nonsense and nonscience. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[213]  L. Tabár,et al.  Quantifying the potential problem of overdiagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer screening. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[214]  Mandana Vahabi,et al.  BREAST CANCER SCREENING METHODS: A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE , 2003, Health care for women international.

[215]  Screening for breast cancer with MRI. , 2003 .

[216]  L. Tabár,et al.  The Swedish Two-County Trial of mammographic screening: cluster randomisation and end point evaluation. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[217]  Isabelle Bedrosian,et al.  Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Cancer.

[218]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. , 2003, JAMA.

[219]  Local failure and prognostic factors in ductal carcinoma in situ: concentration on recent publications , 2003, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[220]  Alexandra L Hanlon,et al.  Routine mammography is associated with earlier stage disease and greater eligibility for breast conservation in breast carcinoma patients age 40 years and older , 2003, Cancer.

[221]  P. Gøtzsche,et al.  Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[222]  T. Holford,et al.  The risk of a contralateral breast cancer among women diagnosed with ductal and lobular breast carcinoma in situ: data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. , 2003, Breast.

[223]  L. Tabár,et al.  Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening , 2003, The Lancet.

[224]  Roman Shyyan,et al.  Introduction of Breast Cancer Screening in Chernihiv Oblast in the Ukraine: Report of a PATH Breast Cancer Assistance Program Experience , 2003, The breast journal.

[225]  I. Vejborg,et al.  Breast cancer incidence after the start of mammography screening in Denmark , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[226]  D. Stanley.  The mammography dilemma. , 2003, Annals of internal medicine.

[227]  N. Weiss.  Breast Cancer Mortality in Relation to Clinical Breast Examination and Breast Self‐Examination , 2003, The breast journal.

[228]  R. Gelber,et al.  Systemic treatments for women with breast cancer: outcome with relation to screening for the disease. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[229]  H. Freeman,et al.  Impact of a cancer screening program on breast cancer stage at diagnosis in a medically underserved urban community. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[230]  William A Hensel,et al.  Mammographic screening for breast cancer. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[231]  A. Ellis.  Breast , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[232]  Mammography and beyond: building better breast cancer screening tests. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[233]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[234]  The influence of a false-positive mammogram on a woman's subsequent behaviour for detecting breast cancer. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[235]  Tim Byers,et al.  Mammography screening matters for young women with breast carcinoma , 2003, Cancer.

[236]  H. Helenius,et al.  Significant improvement in breast cancer survival through population-based mammography screening. , 2003, Breast.

[237]  Analysis of benefit:risk ratio and mortality reduction for the UK Breast Screening Programme. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[238]  A. Miller,et al.  Why is breast-cancer mortality declining? , 2003, The Lancet. Oncology.

[239]  J. Hendriks,et al.  Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review , 2003, The Lancet.

[240]  A. Hackshaw,et al.  EUSOMA review of mammography screening. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[241]  A. Verbeek,et al.  Evaluation of The Netherlands breast cancer screening programme. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[242]  J. Cawson,et al.  Counselling interventions to address the psychological consequences of screening mammography: a randomised trial. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.

[243]  Truls Østbye,et al.  Screening Mammography and Pap Tests Among Older American Women 1996–2000: Results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD) , 2003, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[244]  D. Atkins,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 65 years: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. , 2003, Annals of internal medicine.

[245]  C. Bancej,et al.  Contribution of clinical breast examination to mammography screening in the early detection of breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of medical screening.

[246]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Mammography screening in elderly women: efficacy and cost-effectiveness. , 2003, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[247]  S. Walter.  Mammographic screening: case-control studies. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[248]  G. Farshid,et al.  The use of fine‐needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the assessment of highly suspicious mammographic microcalcifications , 2003, Cancer.

[249]  Roy A Jensen,et al.  Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Impact of Pathology on Therapeutic Decisions , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[250]  A. Jemal,et al.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[251]  Mortality reduction by breast-cancer screening , 2003, The Lancet.

[252]  L. Tabár,et al.  The relative contributions of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in reducing mortality from the disease. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[253]  P. Sasieni.  Evaluation of the UK breast screening programmes. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[254]  David Fleiszer,et al.  International prospective evaluation of scintimammography with (99m)technetium sestamibi. , 2003, American journal of surgery.

[255]  L. Nyström,et al.  Service screening with mammography. Long-term effects on breast cancer mortality in the county of Gävleborg, Sweden. , 2003, Breast.

[256]  R. Langer,et al.  Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[257]  K. Mokbel.  Current management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast , 2003, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[258]  E. Lynge,et al.  Reporting of performance indicators of mammography screening in Europe , 2003, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[259]  Barnett S Kramer,et al.  Estimating the Cumulative Risk of a False‐Positive Test in a Repeated Screening Program , 2004, Biometrics.

[260]  N Houssami,et al.  New technologies in screening for breast cancer: a systematic review of their accuracy , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[261]  Re: Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[262]  K. Emmons,et al.  Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[263]  P. Gøtzsche.  On the benefits and harms of screening for breast cancer. , 2004, International journal of epidemiology.

[264]  An academic health center cost analysis of screening mammography , 2004, Cancer.

[265]  J. Vestrup,et al.  Satisfaction and Anxiety for Women During Investigation of an Abnormal Screening Mammogram , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[266]  L Nyström,et al.  Early breast cancer deaths in women aged 40-74 years diagnosed during the first 5 years of organised mammography service screening in north Sweden. , 2004, Breast.

[267]  M. Manos,et al.  Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up? , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[268]  W. Satariano,et al.  Evaluating a campaign to detect early stage breast tumors in the United States , 2002, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[269]  Y. H. Lee,et al.  The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis and Management of Breast Cancer , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[270]  L. Rutqvist,et al.  Followup after 11 years – update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial , 1997, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[271]  S. Hofvind,et al.  Do the results of the process indicators in the Norwegian breast cancer screening program predict future mortality reduction from breast cancer? , 2004, Acta oncologica.

[272]  J. Elmore,et al.  Breast self-examination: who teaches it, who is taught, and how often? (United States) , 2002, Cancer Causes & Control.

[273]  Jeffrey C Weinreb,et al.  The use of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[274]  V. Kataja,et al.  Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods. , 2004, JAMA.

[275]  Emily White,et al.  Predictors of Sensitivity of Clinical Breast Examination (CBE) , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[276]  M. Morrow.  The certainties and the uncertainties of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[277]  J. Elmore,et al.  Balancing mammography's benefits and harms , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[278]  D. Kopans.  Mammography screening is saving thousands of lives, but will it survive medical malpractice? , 2004, Radiology.

[279]  Teresa To,et al.  Mammography benefit in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study‐2: A model evaluation , 2004, International Journal of Cancer.

[280]  Overdiagnosis of breast cancer in Denmark , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[281]  J. Fulton,et al.  Mammographic Screening and Disease Presentation of Breast Cancer Patients Who Die of Disease , 2004, The breast journal.

[282]  S. Duffy,et al.  An audit of assessment procedures in women who develop breast cancer after a negative result , 2004, Journal of medical screening.

[283]  MRI better than mammography for detection of breast cancer? , 2004, The Lancet. Oncology.

[284]  D. Jeffe,et al.  The Full Potential of Breast Cancer Screening Use to Reduce Mortality has not yet been Realized in the United States , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[285]  D. Redelmeier,et al.  A Comparison of Risk Perception and Psychological Morbidity in Women with Ductal Carcinoma in situ and Early Invasive Breast Cancer , 2003, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[286]  Rhian Gabe,et al.  The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? , 2004, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[287]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Impact of screening for breast cancer in high-risk women on health-related quality of life , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[288]  Richard J. K. Taylor,et al.  Mammography Screening and Breast Cancer Mortality in New South Wales, Australia , 2004, Cancer Causes & Control.

[289]  L. Tabár,et al.  Number needed to screen: lives saved over 20 years of follow-up in mammographic screening , 2004, Journal of medical screening.

[290]  Emily White,et al.  Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[291]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[292]  Solveig Hofvind,et al.  The cumulative risk of a false‐positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program , 2004, Cancer.

[293]  Lower costs of hospital treatment of breast cancer through a population-based mammography screening programme. , 2004, European journal of public health.

[294]  Get the facts straight. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[295]  G. Farshid,et al.  Detection by screening mammography is a powerful independent predictor of survival in women diagnosed with breast cancer. , 2004, Breast.

[296]  Jan Mæhlen,et al.  Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[297]  R Sainsbury.  The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Disorders , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[298]  Daniel Kopans,et al.  Clinical Breast Examination: Practical Recommendations for Optimizing Performance and Reporting , 2004, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[299]  T. Tuttle,et al.  Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[300]  J. Hendriks,et al.  Breast ultrasound in women with familial risk of breast cancer. , 2004, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[301]  M. Baum.  Commentary: false premises, false promises and false positives--the case against mammographic screening for breast cancer. , 2004, International journal of epidemiology.

[302]  Commentary: does screening mammography lead to breast cancer overdiagnosis? , 2004, The journal of the British Menopause Society.

[303]  Z. Rayter,et al.  Overdiagnosis of breast cancer in screening. , 2004, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[304]  I. Ellis,et al.  Influence of annual mammography from age 40 on breast cancer pathology. , 2004, Human pathology.

[305]  V. Semiglazov,et al.  The role of breast self-examination in early breast cancer detection (results of the 5-years USSR/WHO randomized study in Leningrad) , 1992, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[306]  B. Yankaskas,et al.  Screening mammography performance and cancer detection among black women and white women in community practice , 2004, Cancer.

[307]  S. Duffy,et al.  Overdiagnosis in screening: is the increase in breast cancer incidence rates a cause for concern? , 2004, Journal of medical screening.

[308]  Robert A. Goulart,et al.  Diagnostic Agreement in the Evaluation of Image-guided Breast Core Needle Biopsies: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[309]  A. Thor,et al.  A Revised Staging System for Breast Cancer , 2004, The breast journal.

[310]  L. Holmberg,et al.  Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: a New Phenotype Classification System and its Relation to Prognosis , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[311]  Margarita L Zuley,et al.  Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience. , 2004, Radiology.

[312]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  What should the burden of proof be for acceptance of a new breast-cancer screening technique? , 2004, The Lancet.

[313]  Current dilemmas and future perspectives for breast cancer screening with a focus on optimization of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging by advances in signal processing. , 2004, The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ.

[314]  E. Andreopoulou,et al.  An overview of the status of imaging screening technology for breast cancer. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[315]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Mammographic screening: Patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival , 2004, Cancer.

[316]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging , 2000, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[317]  S. Harms.  Introduction to the International Working Groups on Breast MRI , 2004, The breast journal.

[318]  S. Feig,et al.  Adverse effects of screening mammography. , 2004, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[319]  Mammography studies revisited. , 2004, Minnesota medicine.

[320]  Arild Hervik,et al.  Mammography screening in Norway: results from the first screening round in four counties and cost-effectiveness of a modeled nationwide screening , 2004, Cancer Causes & Control.

[321]  Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age. , 2004, American family physician.

[322]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[323]  D. Freedman,et al.  On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer. , 2004, International journal of epidemiology.

[324]  G. Berglund,et al.  No relations between breast cancer risk and fatty acids of erythrocyte membranes in postmenopausal women of the Malmö Diet Cancer cohort (Sweden) , 2004, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[325]  J. Elmore,et al.  A population-based study of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy efficacy in women at elevated risk for breast cancer in community practices. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[326]  L. Tabár,et al.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: Estimates of overdiagnosis from two trials of mammographic screening for breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[327]  D. Petitti,et al.  Saving Women's Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis , 2005 .

[328]  K. Faulkner.  Mammographic screening: is the benefit worth the risk? , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[329]  A. McAlearney,et al.  Perceptions of insurance coverage for screening mammography among women in need of screening , 2005, Cancer.

[330]  I. Henderson,et al.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: Rates of ductal carcinoma in situ: a US perspective , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[331]  Carmen L. Lewis,et al.  Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in the elderly: a review of the evidence. , 2005, The American journal of medicine.

[332]  Constantine Gatsonis,et al.  Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Cancer.

[333]  P. Carney,et al.  Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[334]  C. Baines.  Are There Downsides to Mammography Screening? , 2005, The breast journal.

[335]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: Microsimulation modelling estimates based on observed screen and clinical data , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[336]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Race and ethnicity: comparing medical records to self-reports. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[337]  Informed consent for mammography screening: modelling the risks and benefits for American women , 2005, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[338]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[339]  A. Berrington de González,et al.  Mammographic screening before age 50 years in the UK: comparison of the radiation risks with the mortality benefits , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[340]  T. Peretz,et al.  Effect of breast magnetic resonance imaging on the clinical management of breast cancer. , 2005, The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ.

[341]  G. Eklund,et al.  Randomized study of mammography screening — preliminary report on mortality in the stockholm trial , 1991, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[342]  David Ruppert,et al.  Assessing the Skill of Yes/No Predictions , 2005, Biometrics.

[343]  W. Dupont,et al.  The natural history of low‐grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women treated by biopsy only revealed over 30 years of long‐term follow‐up , 2005, Cancer.

[344]  I. Tannock,et al.  Fatigue, menopausal symptoms, and cognitive function in women after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: 1- and 2-year follow-up of a prospective controlled study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[345]  G Verdú,et al.  Use of risk projection models to estimate mortality and incidence from radiation-induced breast cancer in screening programs , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[346]  Angela Fagerlin,et al.  Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[347]  P. Kronqvist,et al.  Population-based mammography screening results in substantial savings in treatment costs for fatal breast cancer , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[348]  New techniques for mammography screening: advantages and limitations. , 2005, Missouri medicine.

[349]  A R Padhani,et al.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) , 2005, The Lancet.

[350]  P. Kronqvist,et al.  Mammographic screening reduces risk of breast carcinoma recurrence , 2005, Cancer.

[351]  S. Feig.  Screening Mammography Controversies: Resolved, Partly Resolved, and Unresolved , 2005, The breast journal.

[352]  Russell P. Harris.  Effectiveness: the next question for breast cancer screening. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[353]  Elizabeth A Morris,et al.  Determination of the Presence and Extent of Pure Ductal Carcinoma in Situ by Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, The breast journal.

[354]  D. Axelrod,et al.  Evaluation of pathways for progression of heterogeneous breast tumors. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[355]  Yu Shen,et al.  Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[356]  Debra M Ikeda,et al.  Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. , 2005, Radiology.

[357]  D. Berry,et al.  Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer , 2005 .

[358]  J. Austoker,et al.  The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review , 2005, Psycho-oncology.

[359]  MRI in breast cancer management: potential for benefit and harm. , 2005, International journal of fertility and women's medicine.

[360]  J. Baum,et al.  Relaxation techniques for reducing pain and anxiety during screening mammography. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[361]  E. Mendelson,et al.  Incorporating new imaging models in breast cancer management , 2005, Current treatment options in oncology.

[362]  S. Moss,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40: predicted mortality based on surrogate outcome measures , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[363]  Breast cancer screening for women aged 40 to 49 years--what does the evidence mean for New Zealand? , 2005, The New Zealand medical journal.

[364]  Les Irwig,et al.  Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[365]  D. Ghersi,et al.  Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[366]  Deborah Schrag,et al.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[367]  N. Day.  Overdiagnosis and breast cancer screening , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[368]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Quality assessment of the mammographic screening programme in the Azienda Sanitaria locale Provincia Milano 1 -- analysis of interval cancers and discussion of possible causes of diagnostic error. , 2005, La Radiologia medica.

[369]  Geographic association between mammography use and mortality reduction in the US , 2005, Cancer Causes & Control.

[370]  J. Elmore,et al.  Efficacy of prophylactic mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer: a cancer research network project. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[371]  S. Moss.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: Overdiagnosis in randomised controlled trials of breast cancer screening , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[372]  A. Fagerlin,et al.  Patterns and correlates of local therapy for women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[373]  J. Elmore,et al.  Screening clinical breast examination: how often does it miss lethal breast cancer? , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[374]  D. Tripathy.  Targeted Therapies in Breast Cancer , 2005, The breast journal.

[375]  Kenneth G A Gilhuijs,et al.  Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions on MR images: potential effect of computerized assessment on clinical reading. , 2005, Radiology.

[376]  S. Tyldesley,et al.  Comparison of 1- and 2-year screening intervals for women undergoing screening mammography , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[377]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Community-based mammography practice: services, charges, and interpretation methods. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[378]  Missed breast cancer: the legal factors. , 2005, Journal of law and medicine.

[379]  F. Mebane,et al.  News Media Coverage of a Women's Health Controversy: How Newspapers and TV Outlets Covered a Recent Debate Over Screening Mammography , 2005, Women & health.

[380]  G. Colditz,et al.  Outcome of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ untreated after diagnostic biopsy , 2005, Cancer.

[381]  Elsebeth Lynge,et al.  Breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen after introduction of mammography screening: cohort study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[382]  Gary R Cutter,et al.  Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States. , 2005, Radiology.

[383]  S. Fletcher,et al.  Information and involvement preferences of women in their 40s before their first screening mammogram. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[384]  H. Bartelink,et al.  Long‐term outcome after breast‐conservation treatment with radiation for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast , 2005, Cancer.

[385]  Simulation of Begin and End Ages for Mammography Screening , 2005, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[386]  [MRI for breast disease diagnosis; an asset, but the proper place has to be determined first]. , 2005, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[387]  M. J. van de Vijver.  Biological variables and prognosis of DCIS. , 2005, Breast.

[388]  David Gur,et al.  Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice. , 2005, Radiology.

[389]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  A Model-Based Comparison of Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: Mammograms and Clinical Breast Examinations , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[390]  B. Viták,et al.  Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program. , 2005, Radiology.

[391]  P. Taylor,et al.  Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. , 2005, Radiology.

[392]  S. Duffy.  Some current issues in breast cancer screening , 2005, Journal of medical screening.

[393]  S. Duffy,et al.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in service screening , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[394]  Julie David,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: current indications. , 2005, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[395]  R. Fimmers,et al.  Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[396]  Bircan Erbas,et al.  The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[397]  K. Malone,et al.  Age-Specific Incidence Rates of In situ Breast Carcinomas by Histologic Type, 1980 to 2001 , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[398]  K. Holli,et al.  Follow-up Cost of Breast Cancer Patients with Localized Disease After Primary Treatment: a Randomized Trial , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[399]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[400]  Emily White,et al.  The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[401]  E. Pisano,et al.  Imaging and cancer: research strategy of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network. , 2005, Radiology.

[402]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Efficacy of breast cancer screening in the community according to risk level. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[403]  S. Moss,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40: results of screening in the first 10 years , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[404]  A. Miller,et al.  Breast screening in the emerging world: high prevalence of breast cancer in Cairo. , 2005, Breast.

[405]  Rongwei Fu,et al.  Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[406]  C. Y. Wang,et al.  Estrogen-plus-progestin use and mammographic density in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative randomized trial. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[407]  A. Bradbury,et al.  The case for individualized screening recommendations for breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[408]  E. Morris,et al.  Results of MRI Screening for Breast Cancer in High-Risk Patients with LCIS and Atypical Hyperplasia , 2007, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[409]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium , 2006, Cancer.

[410]  L. Esserman,et al.  Applying the neoadjuvant paradigm to ductal carcinoma in situ , 2006, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[411]  V. Tsikitis,et al.  Biology of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Classification Based on Biologic Potential , 2006, American journal of clinical oncology.

[412]  Jennifer Cullen,et al.  The SPECTRUM population model of the impact of screening and treatment on U.S. breast cancer trends from 1975 to 2000: principles and practice of the model methods. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[413]  Anne J. Kearney.  Increasing Our Understanding of Breast Self-Examination: Women Talk About Cancer, the Health Care System, and Being Women , 2006, Qualitative health research.

[414]  J. Elmore,et al.  Specificity of Clinical Breast Examination in Community Practice , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[415]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Minority report – false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[416]  R. Coombes,et al.  Long-term follow-up of a randomised trial designed to determine the need for irradiation following conservative surgery for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[417]  K. Mokbel,et al.  Heterogeneity of ductal carcinoma in situ and its effects on management. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[418]  Effect of Screening Mammography on the Surgery of Breast Cancer in Finland: A Population-Based Analysis during the Years 1985–2004 , 2006, The American surgeon.

[419]  P. Glynn,et al.  A stochastic simulation model of U.S. breast cancer mortality trends from 1975 to 2000. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[420]  E. Feuer.  Modeling the impact of adjuvant therapy and screening mammography on U.S. breast cancer mortality between 1975 and 2000: introduction to the problem. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[421]  H. Helenius,et al.  Service screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality among elderly women in Turku , 2006, Journal of medical screening.

[422]  C. Cardinez,et al.  United States cancer statistics; 2003 incidence and mortality , 2006 .

[423]  T. Ali,et al.  Evaluation of efficacy of self breast examination for breast cancer prevention: a cost effective screening tool. , 2006, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[424]  I. Vejborg,et al.  Performance of combined clinical mammography and needle biopsy: a nationwide study from Denmark , 2006, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[425]  S. Moss,et al.  Radiological findings of screen-detected cancers in a multi-centre randomized, controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40 to 48 years. , 2006, Clinical radiology.

[426]  Ingvar Andersson,et al.  Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[427]  B. Hickey,et al.  Sequencing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy for early breast cancer. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[428]  J. Mæhlen,et al.  Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: Definition of overdiagnosis is confusing in follow-up of Malmö trial , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[429]  Elizabeth A Morris,et al.  Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[430]  G. Ursin,et al.  Association of new-onset breast discomfort with an increase in mammographic density during hormone therapy. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[431]  L. Tabár,et al.  Reduction in Breast Cancer Mortality from the Organised Service Screening with Mammography: 2. Validation with Alternative Analytic Methods , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[432]  T. Vehmas,et al.  Effect of computer-aided detection on mammographic performance: experimental study on readers with different levels of experience , 2006, Acta radiologica.

[433]  T. Lash,et al.  Reduced Mortality Rate Associated with Annual Mammograms after Breast Cancer Therapy , 2006, The breast journal.

[434]  K. Ohnuki,et al.  Cost‐effectiveness analysis of screening modalities for breast cancer in Japan with special reference to women aged 40–49 years , 2006, Cancer science.

[435]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Quality Control of Mammography Screening in the Veneto Region. Evaluation of Four Programs at a Local Health Unit Level - Analysis of the Frequency and Diagnostic Pattern of Interval Cancers , 2006, Tumori.

[436]  J. Hilden,et al.  Performance of clinical mammography: A nationwide study from Denmark , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[437]  S. Duffy,et al.  Audit of negative assessments in a breast-screening programme in women who later develop breast cancer-implications for survival. , 2006, Breast.

[438]  S. Feig.  Screening mammography: a successful public health initiative. , 2006, Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health.

[439]  Maureen A Smith,et al.  Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[440]  I. Chew,et al.  Cytology is useful in breast screening: results and long‐term follow‐up of the Singapore Breast Screening Pilot Project , 2006, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[441]  D. Bowen,et al.  Effects of Breast Cancer Risk Counseling for Sexual Minority Women , 2006, Health care for women international.

[442]  J. Otten,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of different reading and referral strategies in mammography screening in the Netherlands , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[443]  S. Duffy,et al.  Some issues in screening for breast and other cancers. , 2006, Journal of medical screening.

[444]  H. Le‐Petross.  Breast MRI as a screening tool: the appropriate role. , 2006, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[445]  H. Møller,et al.  Over-diagnosis in breast cancer screening , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[446]  D. Keating,et al.  Clinical breast examination in a comprehensive breast cancer screening program: contribution and cost. , 2006, Radiology.

[447]  Michael Waller,et al.  Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[448]  S. Rosso,et al.  Estimate of overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography after adjustment for lead time. A service screening study in Italy , 2006, Breast Cancer Research.

[449]  Paola Pisani,et al.  Outcome of screening by clinical examination of the breast in a trial in the Philippines , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[450]  H. Iwase,et al.  [Breast cancer]. , 2006, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[451]  J. Cuzick,et al.  The prevention, detection, and management of breast cancer , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.

[452]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Impact of IRB requirements on a multicenter survey of prophylactic mastectomy outcomes. , 2006, Annals of epidemiology.

[453]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. , 2006, Radiology.

[454]  S. Duffy,et al.  Overdiagnosis, Sojourn Time, and Sensitivity in the Copenhagen Mammography Screening Program , 2006, The breast journal.

[455]  Gisella Gennaro,et al.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography , 2006, European Radiology.

[456]  Carmel Hayes,et al.  A test of performance of breast MRI interpretation in a multicentre screening study. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[457]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Women ≤ 40 versus 50 to 60 Years: Increasing Size and Stage Disparity Compared With Older Women Over Time , 2006, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[458]  G. Lyman,et al.  Screening mammography at 40–49 years: regret or no regret? , 2006, The Lancet.

[459]  P. Gøtzsche.  Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: Overdiagnosis in the Malmö trial was considerably underestimated , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[460]  L. Tabár,et al.  Tumor Size and Breast Cancer Detection: What Might Be the Effect of a Less Sensitive Screening Tool Than Mammography? , 2006, The breast journal.

[461]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .

[462]  Lurdes Y. T. Inoue,et al.  Modeling the impact of treatment and screening on U.S. breast cancer mortality: a Bayesian approach. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[463]  J. Elmore,et al.  Breast self-examination: self-reported frequency, quality, and associated outcomes. , 2006, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[464]  G. Osborn,et al.  Is general practitioner access to breast imaging safe? , 2006, Clinical radiology.

[465]  J. Jones,et al.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ: the pathological perspective , 2006, Breast Cancer Research.

[466]  X. Castells,et al.  Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme , 2006, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[467]  P. Møller,et al.  Screening mammography and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a case-control study. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[468]  P. Giorgi Rossi,et al.  The effect of screening programmes on the treatment of benign breast neoplasms: observations from current practice in Italy , 2006, Journal of medical screening.

[469]  Garnet L Anderson,et al.  Effects of conjugated equine estrogens on breast cancer and mammography screening in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy. , 2006, JAMA.

[470]  The trade-off between population and individual benefit of screening. , 2006, Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung.

[471]  V. Beral,et al.  Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future , 2006, Journal of medical screening.

[472]  J. Elmore,et al.  Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms , 2001, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[473]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Medical radiation exposure and breast cancer risk: Findings from the Breast Cancer Family Registry , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[474]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[475]  S. Ciatto.  Real time reading in mammography breast screening , 2007, La radiologia medica.

[476]  Estimating net benefits and harms of screening mammography in women age 40 to 49 years. , 2007, Annals of internal medicine.

[477]  Michael J Schell,et al.  Evidence-based target recall rates for screening mammography. , 2007, Radiology.

[478]  W. Heindel,et al.  Digital mammography screening: average glandular dose and first performance parameters. , 2007, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[479]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[480]  Eric J Feuer,et al.  The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[481]  Noel T Brewer,et al.  Systematic Review: The Long-Term Effects of False-Positive Mammograms , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[482]  Douglas K Owens,et al.  Screening Mammography for Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[483]  A. Detsky,et al.  Relevance of cost-effectiveness analysis to clinicians and policy makers. , 2007, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

[484]  Manfred S. Green,et al.  Routine screening mammography in women older than 74 years: a review of the available data. , 2007, Maturitas.

[485]  T. Lash,et al.  Mammography surveillance and mortality in older breast cancer survivors. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[486]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[487]  Robert A. Smith,et al.  The evolving role of MRI in the detection and evaluation of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[488]  G. Lyman,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: a review of recent advances , 2007, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[489]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007 .

[490]  E. Paci,et al.  Breast Cancer Diagnostic Methods: Screen-Detected and Clinical Cases. An Italian Survey of Women's Experiences , 2007, Tumori.

[491]  J. Bulliard,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality-controlled mammography screening program from the Swiss statutory health-care perspective: quantitative assessment of the most influential factors. , 2007, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[492]  Mammographic screening from age 40 years , 2007, The Lancet.

[493]  Russell Harris,et al.  Using an office system intervention to increase breast cancer screening , 1998, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[494]  P. Skaane,et al.  Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[495]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[496]  G. Maddern,et al.  NATIONAL BREAST CANCER AUDIT: DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND , 2007, ANZ journal of surgery.

[497]  S. Moss,et al.  Radiological and pathological findings of interval cancers in a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40-41 years. , 2007, Clinical radiology.

[498]  J. Elmore,et al.  Breast cancer screening use by African Americans and whites in an HMO , 2000, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[499]  Wendie A Berg,et al.  Beyond standard mammographic screening: mammography at age extremes, ultrasound, and MR imaging. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[500]  Eun Sook Ko,et al.  MRI of the Breast for the Detection and Assessment of the Size of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ , 2007, Korean journal of radiology.

[501]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Mammography before diagnosis among women age 80 years and older with breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[502]  E. Pisano,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[503]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Breast cancer screening: Evidence for false reassurance? , 2008, International journal of cancer.

[504]  E. Paci,et al.  Evaluation of service mammography screening impact in Italy. The contribution of hazard analysis. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[505]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. , 2008, JAMA.