Nurses and Internet health information: a questionnaire survey.

AIM This paper is a report of a study to identify the extent of postgraduate nursing students' information literacy skills in relation to electronic media and health information and barriers to accessing this information. BACKGROUND The Internet is a key source of information for a significant group of patients. However, there is evidence of quality issues with some Internet health information sites. Nurses need to be aware of the range and quality of online health information so as to assist patients and families to locate and evaluate relevant and current information. METHOD A questionnaire designed to collect quantitative and qualitative data was posted to a convenience sample of all students enrolled in a postgraduate nursing programme in December 2005. The response rate was 55.1% or 123 responses. RESULTS Most respondents had Internet access at home and work and believed that access to online health information resources had improved their practice. However, some had difficulties in accessing computers at work and insufficient time to search for online health information. Concern was expressed about the quality of online information, but the majority of respondents did not assess patient use. Frequent users of online resources were more likely to assess patient use. CONCLUSION The development of nursing competencies in accessing and using online resources is a key precursor to supporting patients and families' use of the medium. Access to Internet resources at work, along with training and time for searching, is necessary for the development of skills enabling effective use of information technology.

[1]  S. Ziebland,et al.  How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  C. Shilling Culture, the 'sick role' and the consumption of health. , 2002, The British journal of sociology.

[3]  E. Ernst,et al.  Complementary/alternative medicine for diabetes. How good is advice offered on websites? , 2003, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[4]  Ben Gerber,et al.  eHealth Technology and Internet Resources: Barriers for Vulnerable Populations , 2004, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[5]  Sarah Nettleton,et al.  The Emergence of E-Scaped Medicine? , 2004 .

[6]  Alejandro R. Jadad,et al.  Internet Use Among Physicians, Nurses, and Their Patients , 2001 .

[7]  P. Brown,et al.  Social movements in health: an introduction. , 2004, Sociology of health & illness.

[8]  K. Haver,et al.  Cystic fibrosis on the Internet: a survey of site adherence to AMA guidelines. , 2004, Pediatrics.

[9]  Carol J. Bickford,et al.  Computer literacy study: report of qualitative findings. , 2006, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[10]  H. Scott,et al.  Consumer access to health information on the internet: health policy implications , 2005, Australia and New Zealand health policy.

[11]  S. Kalichman,et al.  HIV-AIDS patients' evaluation of health information on the internet: the digital divide and vulnerability to fraudulent claims. , 2004, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[12]  T. Nolan,et al.  Computer Use in an Urban University Hospital: Technology Ahead of Literacy , 2006, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[13]  Johanna I Westbrook,et al.  Nurses' use of online clinical evidence. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[14]  Angela Tod,et al.  Nurses' use of the Internet in clinical ward settings. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[15]  R. Butler,et al.  Do trainees have adequate access to computers and computer software , 2001 .

[16]  J. Gilmour,et al.  Reducing disparities in the access and use of Internet health information. a discussion paper. , 2007, International journal of nursing studies.

[17]  E Ernst,et al.  Assessing websites on complementary and alternative medicine for cancer. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  G. Herbison,et al.  Internet use amongst New Zealand general practitioners. , 2000, The New Zealand medical journal.

[19]  J. Dixon,et al.  Mind the gap: the extent of the NHS nursing shortage , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Bischoff Wr,et al.  21st century house call: the Internet and the World Wide Web. , 1999 .

[21]  P. Crookes,et al.  Developing information literacy: a key to evidence-based nursing. , 2001, International nursing review.

[23]  A. DiCenso,et al.  Evaluation of a system for providing information resources to nurses , 2000 .

[24]  X. Xu,et al.  Bickerstaff's brainstem encephalitis, Miller Fisher syndrome and Guillain–Barre syndrome overlap with negative anti‐GQ1b antibodies , 2003, European journal of neurology.

[25]  Roger Burrows,et al.  Health E-types? , 2004 .

[26]  Carol S. Bond,et al.  Surfing or drowning? Student nurses' Internet skills. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[27]  Joseph A. Diaz,et al.  Patients’ use of the internet for medical information , 2002, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[28]  Carole A Estabrooks,et al.  The Internet and access to evidence: how are nurses positioned? , 2003, Journal of advanced nursing.