Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function.

A dosage formula has been derived from a retrospective analysis of carboplatin pharmacokinetics in 18 patients with pretreatment glomerular filtration rates (GFR) in the range of 33 to 136 mL/min. Carboplatin plasma clearance was linearly related to GFR (r = 0.85, P less than .00001) and rearrangements of the equation describing the correlation gave the dosage formula dose (mg) = target area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) x (1.2 x GFR + 20). In a prospective clinical and pharmacokinetic study the formula was used to determine the dose required to treat 31 patients (GFR range, 33 to 135 mL/min) with 40 courses of carboplatin. The target AUC was escalated from 3 to 8 mg carboplatin/mL/min. Over this AUC range the formula accurately predicted the observed AUC (observed/predicted ratio 1.24 +/- 0.11, r = 0.886) and using these additional data, the formula was refined. Dose (mg) = target AUC x (GFR + 25) is now the recommended formula. AUC values of 4 to 6 and 6 to 8 mg/mL. min gave rise to manageable hematological toxicity in previously treated and untreated patients, respectively, and hence target AUC values of 5 and 7 mg/mL min are recommended for single-agent carboplatin in these patient groups. Pharmacokinetic modeling demonstrated that the formula was reasonably accurate regardless of whether a one- or two-compartment model most accurately described carboplatin pharmacokinetics, assuming that body size did not influence nonrenal clearance. The validity of this assumption was demonstrated in 13 patients where no correlation between surface area and nonrenal clearance was found (r = .31, P = .30). Therefore, the formula provides a simple and consistent method of determining carboplatin dose in adults. Since the measure of carboplatin exposure in the formula is AUC, and not toxicity, it will not be influenced by previous or concurrent myelosuppressive therapy or supportive measures. The formula is therefore applicable to combination and high-dose studies as well as conventional single-agent therapy, although the target AUC for carboplatin will need to be redefined for combination chemotherapy.

[1]  J. Bull,et al.  Kinetics of cis‐dichlorodiammineplatinum , 1979, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[2]  H. Piaggio,et al.  An elementary treatise on differential equations and their applications , 1920 .

[3]  H. Pinedo,et al.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of cisplatin and three analogues in mice and humans. , 1987, Cancer research.

[4]  B. Leyland-Jones,et al.  Results of NCI-sponsored phase I trials with carboplatin. , 1985, Cancer treatment reviews.

[5]  H. Pinedo,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of diammine(l,l cyclobutanedi carboxylato) platinum(II) (carboplatin) after intravenous administration , 1987 .

[6]  S. Carter,et al.  Carboplatin: the clinical spectrum to date. , 1985, Cancer treatment reviews.

[7]  Z. Siddik,et al.  The comparative pharmacokinetics of carboplatin and cisplatin in mice and rats. , 1987, Biochemical pharmacology.

[8]  K. Harrap Preclinical studies identifying carboplatin as a viable cisplatin alternative. , 1985, Cancer treatment reviews.

[9]  K. Eguchi,et al.  Prediction of hematologic toxicity of carboplatin by creatinine clearance rate. , 1987, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[10]  M. Rozencweig,et al.  Carboplatin: current status and future prospects. , 1988, Cancer treatment reviews.

[11]  F. Cavalli,et al.  Iproplatin and carboplatin induced toxicities: overview of phase II clinical trial conducted by the EORTC Early Clinical Trials Cooperative Group (ECTG). , 1988, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[12]  E. Wiltshaw,et al.  Ovarian trials at the Royal Marsden. , 1985, Cancer treatment reviews.

[13]  D. Newell,et al.  Phase I studies with carboplatin at the Royal Marsden Hospital. , 1985, Cancer treatment reviews.

[14]  W. Rose,et al.  Preclinical antitumor and toxicologic profile of carboplatin. , 1985, Cancer treatment reviews.

[15]  M. Egorin,et al.  Prospective validation of a pharmacologically based dosing scheme for the cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) analogue diamminecyclobutanedicarboxylatoplatinum. , 1985, Cancer research.

[16]  N Veall,et al.  Glomerular filtration rate measurement in man by the single injection methods using 51Cr-EDTA. , 1969, Clinical science.

[17]  J. Koeller,et al.  Phase I clinical trial and pharmacokinetics of carboplatin (nsc 241240) by single monthly 30‐minute infusion , 1986, Cancer.

[18]  W. Evans,et al.  Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion teniposide: systemic exposure as a determinant of response in a phase I trial. , 1987, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  R. Ozols,et al.  A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Diamminecyclobutanedicarboxylatoplatinum (NSC 241240) , 1983 .

[20]  M. Gore,et al.  Plasma free platinum pharmacokinetics in patients treated with high dose carboplatin. , 1987, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[21]  K. Kimura,et al.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Carboplatin , 1988, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[22]  Z. Siddik,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of cis-diammine-1,1-cyclobutane dicarboxylate platinum(II) in patients with normal and impaired renal function. , 1984, Cancer research.

[23]  M. Egorin,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and dosage reduction of cis-diammine(1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato)platinum in patients with impaired renal function. , 1984, Cancer research.

[24]  B. Chabner,et al.  Potential roles for preclinical pharmacology in phase I clinical trials. , 1986, Cancer treatment reports.

[25]  M. Egorin,et al.  Phase I clinical and pharmacologic trial of carboplatin daily for 5 days. , 1984, Cancer treatment reports.

[26]  P. Welling,et al.  Pharmacokinetics: Processes and Mathematics , 1986 .