NAUJŲ PASLAUGŲ TECHNOLOGIJOS TINKAMUMO DAUGIAKRITERINIS VERTINIMAS

Business does not have unanimous methodologies for evaluation of new service technology suitability. There is argued necessity of new service technology suitability evaluation in the article, other conditions are talked over, 34 criteria are identified which are topical for service business, and also model based on modified COPRAS multicriteria evaluation is proposed. For reducing expenditure the offered evaluation is substantiated by two stages. There is a scheduled evaluation according to 7 essential criteria in the first stage. The technologies of new service, which do not meet at least one essential criterion, are treated like unworkable and have to be rejected. Such mode of evaluation permits to escape non-productive expenditure.

[1]  Kuen-Suan Chen,et al.  The integrated evaluation model for administration quality based on service time , 2001 .

[2]  Mary Jo Bitner Service and technology: opportunities and paradoxes , 2001 .

[3]  George M. Giaglis,et al.  Journal of Organizational Change Management Technology innovation-induced business model change: a contingency approach , 2005 .

[4]  Ann E. Marucheck,et al.  Service Management - Academic Issues and Scholarly Reflections from Operations Management Researchers , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[5]  A. Parasuraman Customer service in business‐to‐business markets: an agenda for research , 1998 .

[6]  Richard B. Chase,et al.  DESIGNING HIGH‐CONTACT SERVICE SYSTEMS: APPLICATION TO BRANCHES OF A SAVINGS AND LOAN* , 1984 .

[7]  Darius Kalibatas,et al.  THE SELECTION OF RATIONAL CONSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY PROCESSES VARIANTS USING COPRAS METHOD , 2005 .

[8]  Pranas Malinauskas,et al.  Racionaliu statybos technologiniu procesu parinkimas taikant copras metoda , 2005 .

[9]  Romualdas Ginevičius,et al.  Normalization of quantities of various dimensions , 2008 .

[10]  Julia Kiely,et al.  Creating strategies for managing evolving customer service , 2003 .

[11]  R. Järvinen,et al.  Options of strategic decision making in services , 2003 .

[12]  Mohammad Z. Meybodi Using Principles of Just-in-Time to Improve New Product Development Process , 2003 .

[13]  Louis A. Lefebvre,et al.  Flexibility and technology in services: a conceptual model , 1997 .

[14]  S. Wathen,et al.  Designing services: an information‐processing approach , 1995 .

[15]  Kampan Mukherjee,et al.  Performance measurement system for healthcare processes , 2007 .

[16]  Volker Gruhn,et al.  Modeling and analysis of mobile business processes , 2007, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[17]  Sridhar P. Nerur,et al.  Quality of service - technology and implementation , 2002, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[18]  Richard A. Reid,et al.  Applying the TOC five‐step focusing process in the service sector , 2007 .

[19]  Saligrama R. Agnihothri,et al.  Leveraging technology to improve field service , 2002 .

[20]  Mahmoud M. Yasin,et al.  The effectiveness of hospitality service operations: measurement and implementation concerns , 2007 .

[21]  Ananthanarayanan Parasuraman,et al.  Service quality and productivity: a synergistic perspective , 2002 .

[22]  V. Zeithaml Service excellence in electronic channels , 2002 .

[23]  Renata Korsakiene,et al.  Foreign capital destinations: Baltic States versus India , 2008 .

[24]  The engineer availability process , 1996 .

[25]  G. Stone,et al.  An empirical evaluation of US bank customer perceptions of the impact of technology on service delivery in the banking sector , 2003 .

[26]  Curtis P. McLaughlin,et al.  Why variation reduction is not everything: a new paradigm for service operations , 1996 .

[27]  Rohit Verma,et al.  Self‐service technology and online financial service choice , 2007 .

[28]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Technology infusion in service encounters , 2000 .

[29]  Adrienne Curry,et al.  The relative importance of technology in enhancing customer relationships in banking – a Scottish perspective , 2004 .

[30]  Aditya Parida,et al.  Development of a multi‐criteria hierarchical framework for maintenance performance measurement (MPM) , 2007 .

[31]  A. B. Ngowi,et al.  Construction procurement based on concurrent engineering principles , 2000 .