Present Situation and Trend of Remote Sensing Land Use/Cover Classification Extraction

To further advance the automatic process of land use/cover (LULC) classification extraction through remote sensing (RS) images, by reading many literatures, we summarized the problems, research difficulties and development trends in the process of information extraction and classification of land use. Overall, LULC Classification and extraction based on RS images include 3 tasks: data source selection, sampling design, classification method selection and classifier performance evaluation. These tasks are all important, that is, interdependence and mutual influence. The OBIC method has become a popular method of L ULC classification because it makes full use of geographic information system (GIS) technology to process spatial, spectral and textural features in RS images. There are many OBIC algorithms, especially the Machine learning (ML) algorithms offers the potential for effectiveness and efficiency, such as Random forest (RF), Support vector machine (SVM) and so on. The Object-based image classification (OBIC) method involves three stages: segmentation, feature-selection and classification. A large number of studies have proved that there are many problems in each task of the LCLU classification extraction method based on RS images. These problems include design of sample sampling strategy, determination of optimal image segmentation parameters and optimization of parameter of classification algorithm and so on. At present, solving these problems requires frequent human-computer interaction also has a great negative influence on the automatic extraction process of remote sensing classification. U sing GIS technology to promote the automatic extraction of remote sensing classification has become a trend of the development of remote sensing classification method.

[1]  Zeng-yuan Li,et al.  Methods for sandy land detection based on multispectral remote sensing data , 2018 .

[2]  Timothy A. Warner,et al.  Implementation of machine-learning classification in remote sensing: an applied review , 2018 .

[3]  Ovidiu Csillik,et al.  Fast Segmentation and Classification of Very High Resolution Remote Sensing Data Using SLIC Superpixels , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[4]  Li Yan,et al.  An Object-Based Semantic Classification Method for High Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery Using Ontology , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Sandra Eckert,et al.  Reducing landscape heterogeneity for improved land use and land cover (LULC) classification across the large and complex Ethiopian highlands , 2018 .

[6]  Giorgos Mountrakis,et al.  Effect of classifier selection, reference sample size, reference class distribution and scene heterogeneity in per-pixel classification accuracy using 26 Landsat sites , 2018 .

[7]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Using mixed objects in the training of object-based image classifications , 2017 .

[8]  Wenzhong Shi,et al.  A Random Forests classification method for urban land-use mapping integrating spatial metrics and texture analysis , 2018 .

[9]  Claire Marais-Sicre,et al.  Improved Early Crop Type Identification By Joint Use of High Temporal Resolution SAR And Optical Image Time Series , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[10]  U. Benz,et al.  Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information , 2004 .

[11]  Lei Ma,et al.  Active learning for object-based image classification using predefined training objects , 2018 .

[12]  Peijun Du,et al.  A review of supervised object-based land-cover image classification , 2017 .

[13]  Mariana Belgiu,et al.  Sentinel-2 cropland mapping using pixel-based and object-based time-weighted dynamic time warping analysis , 2018 .

[14]  Saeid Homayouni,et al.  MSMD: maximum separability and minimum dependency feature selection for cropland classification from optical and radar data , 2018 .