Association networks in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi)

We use two novel techniques to analyze association patterns in a group of wild spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) studied continuously for 8 years. Permutation tests identified association rates higher or lower than chance expectation, indicating active processes of companionship and avoidance as opposed to passive aggregation. Network graphs represented individual adults as nodes and their association rates as weighted edges. Strength and eigenvector centrality (a measure of how strongly linked an individual is to other strongly linked individuals) were used to quantify the particular role of individuals in determining the network's structure. Female–female dyads showed higher association rates than any other type of dyad, but permutation tests revealed that these associations cannot be distinguished from random aggregation. Females formed tightly linked clusters that were stable over time, with the exception of immigrant females who showed little association with any adult in the group. Eigenvector centrality was higher for females than for males. Adult males were associated mostly among them, and although their strength of association with others was lower than that of females, their association rates revealed a process of active companionship. Female–male bonds were weaker than those between same-sex pairs, with the exception of those involving young male adults, who by virtue of their strong connections both with female and male adults, appear as temporary brokers between the female and male clusters of the network. This analytical framework can serve to develop a more complete explanation of social structure in species with high levels of fission–fusion dynamics.

[1]  J. Krause,et al.  Potential banana skins in animal social network analysis , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  Peter M. Kappeler,et al.  Evolution of Primate Social Systems , 2002, International Journal of Primatology.

[3]  Colin A. Chapman,et al.  Fission‐Fusion Dynamics , 2008, Current Anthropology.

[4]  Lewis Leon Klein,et al.  The ecology and social organization of the spider monkey, Ateles belzebuth , 1972 .

[5]  H. Whitehead Analysing animal social structure , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  D. Lusseau,et al.  Cyclicity in the structure of female baboon social networks , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  Laura G. Vick Spider Monkeys: Immaturity in spider monkeys: a risky business , 2008 .

[8]  Lars Bejder,et al.  Testing association patterns: issues arising and extensions , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Analyzing Animal Societies: Quantitative Methods for Vertebrate Social Analysis , 2009 .

[10]  F. Aureli,et al.  Spider Monkeys: Social interactions, social relationships and the social system of spider monkeys , 2008 .

[11]  T. Antonucci,et al.  Dynamics of social relationships in midlife. , 2001 .

[12]  A. Korstjens,et al.  Intragroup aggression, fission–fusion dynamics and feeding competition in spider monkeys , 2008 .

[13]  W. Getz,et al.  The socioecology of elephants: analysis of the processes creating multitiered social structures , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  R. A. Hinde,et al.  Interactions, Relationships and Social Structure , 1976 .

[15]  Gabriel Ramos-Fernandez Patterns of association, feeding competition and vocal communication in spider monkeys, Ateles geoffroyi , 2001 .

[16]  G. Ramos-Fernández,et al.  Intragroup lethal aggression in wild spider monkeys , 2006, American journal of primatology.

[17]  M. Fenton,et al.  Analysis of Spix's disc-winged bat association patterns and roosting home ranges reveal a novel social structure among bats , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  A. Link,et al.  Spider Monkeys: Demography and group composition of Ateles , 2008 .

[19]  G. Ramos-Fernández,et al.  Biodiversity conservation, traditional agriculture and ecotourism: Land cover/land use change projections for a natural protected area in the northeastern Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico , 2007 .

[20]  F. Aureli,et al.  Embraces for infant handling in spider monkeys: evidence for a biological market? , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[22]  M. Newman Analysis of weighted networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  M. J. Baxter,et al.  Sex differences and social organization in free-ranging spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) , 1984, Primates.

[24]  Gabriel Ramos-Fernández,et al.  Vocal Communication in a Fission-Fusion Society: Do Spider Monkeys Stay in Touch With Close Associates? , 2005, International Journal of Primatology.

[25]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Circumstances in which exact dominance rank may be important , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Hal Whitehead,et al.  SOCPROG programs: analysing animal social structures , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  G. Ramos-Fernández,et al.  A complex social structure with fission–fusion properties can emerge from a simple foraging model , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[29]  Steven J. Schwager,et al.  A comparison of association indices , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  J. Sugardjito,et al.  Ecological constraints on the grouping of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus) in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Sumatra, Indonesia , 1987, International Journal of Primatology.

[31]  C. Chapman Association patterns of spider monkeys: the influence of ecology and sex on social organization , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[32]  M. Newman,et al.  Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  D. Lusseau,et al.  Animal social networks: an introduction , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  Hal Whitehead,et al.  Techniques for Analyzing Vertebrate Social Structure Using Identified Individuals: Review and Recommendations , 1999 .

[35]  E. C. Owen,et al.  Ranging and association patterns of paired and unpaired adult male Atlantic bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in Sarasota, Florida, provide no evidence for alternative male strategies , 2002 .

[36]  S. Hooker,et al.  Social organization in northern bottlenose whales, Hyperoodon ampullatus: not driven by deep-water foraging? , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  Richard James,et al.  Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  H. Whitehead,et al.  Testing association patterns of social animals , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  Vincent M. Janik,et al.  Cetacean Societies: Field Studies of Dolphins and Whales , 2001 .

[40]  G. Ramos-Fernández,et al.  Population Size and Habitat use of Spider Monkeys at Punta Laguna, Mexico , 2003 .

[41]  L. Bejder,et al.  A method for testing association patterns of social animals , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  Hal Whitehead,et al.  Investigating structure and temporal scale in social organizations using identified individuals , 1995 .