Optimization of energy window and evaluation of scatter compensation methods in MPS using the ideal observer with model mismatch

In this work, we used the ideal observer (IO) and IO with model mismatch (IO-MM) applied in the projection domain and an anthropomorphic Channelized Hotelling Observer (CHO) applied to reconstructed images to optimize the acquisition energy window width and evaluate various scatter compensation methods in the context of a myocardial perfusion SPECT defect detection task. The IO has perfect knowledge of the image formation process and thus reflects performance with perfect compensation for image-degrading factors. Thus, using the IO to optimize imaging systems could lead to suboptimal parameters compared to those optimized for humans interpreting SPECT images reconstructed with imperfect or no compensation. The IO-MM allows incorporating imperfect system models into the IO optimization process. We found that with near-perfect scatter compensation, the optimal energy window for the IO and CHO were similar; in its absence the IO-MM gave a better prediction of the optimal energy window for the CHO using different scatter compensation methods. These data suggest that the IO-MM may be useful for projection-domain optimization when model mismatch is significant, and that the IO is useful when followed by reconstruction with good models of the image formation process.

[1]  Gene Gindi,et al.  Collimator optimization in SPECT based on a joint detection and localization task. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  R S Miyaoka,et al.  Multiwindow scatter correction techniques in single-photon imaging. , 1995, Medical physics.

[4]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  Importance of including model mismatch in ideal observer-based acquisition parameter optimization in SPECT , 2012 .

[5]  Eric C Frey,et al.  Model-based compensation for quantitative 123I brain SPECT imaging , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  B.M.W. Tsui,et al.  A mathematical observer study for the evaluation and optimization of compensation methods for myocardial SPECT using a phantom population that realistically models patient variability , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[7]  P.H. Pretorius,et al.  A comparison of human and model observers in multislice LROC studies , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  D. Lalush,et al.  Comparison of Hotelling observer models and human observers in defect detection from myocardial SPECT imaging , 1999 .

[9]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  Comparison of scatter compensation methods using the ideal observer with model mismatch , 2013 .

[11]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Foundations of Image Science , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Michael Ghaly,et al.  Design of a digital phantom population for myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging research , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Matt A. King,et al.  Channelized hotelling and human observer correlation for lesion detection in hepatic SPECT imaging. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  H. Barrett,et al.  Ideal-observer computation in medical imaging with use of Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  W P Segars,et al.  Fast modelling of the collimator–detector response in Monte Carlo simulation of SPECT imaging using the angular response function , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Matthew A. Kupinski,et al.  Optimizing a multiple-pinhole SPECT system using the ideal observer , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[17]  E. Frey,et al.  A practical method for incorporating scatter in a projector-backprojector for accurate scatter compensation in SPECT , 1993 .

[18]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  Model mismatch and the ideal observer in SPECT , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[19]  Eric C Frey,et al.  An investigation of the trade-off between the count level and image quality in myocardial perfusion SPECT using simulated images: the effects of statistical noise and object variability on defect detectability , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Freek J. Beekman,et al.  Evaluation of 3D Monte Carlo-based scatter correction for 99mTc cardiac perfusion SPECT. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  Xin He,et al.  Application of Three-Class ROC Analysis to Task-Based Image Quality Assessment of Simultaneous Dual-Isotope Myocardial Perfusion SPECT (MPS) , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  K. Ogawa,et al.  A practical method for position-dependent Compton-scatter correction in single photon emission CT. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[23]  Michael Ljungberg,et al.  Development and evaluation of an improved quantitative (90)Y bremsstrahlung SPECT method. , 2012, Medical physics.

[24]  P.H. Pretorius,et al.  Evaluation of scatter compensation strategies and their impact on human detection performance in Tc-99m myocardial perfusion imaging , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[25]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  The SimSET Program , 2012 .

[26]  B.M.W. Tsui,et al.  Comparison of channelized hotelling and human observers in determining optimum OS-EM reconstruction parameters for myocardial SPECT , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[27]  E C Frey,et al.  Scatter compensation methods in 3D iterative SPECT reconstruction: a simulation study. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Matthew A. Kupinski,et al.  A fast model of a multiple-pinhole SPECT imaging system , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[29]  B. Tsui,et al.  A new method for modeling the spatially-variant, object-dependent scatter response function in SPECT , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[30]  H H Barrett,et al.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[31]  Eric C Frey,et al.  Assessment of scatter compensation strategies for (67)Ga SPECT using numerical observers and human LROC studies. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  F J Beekman,et al.  Efficient SPECT scatter calculation in non-uniform media using correlated Monte Carlo simulation. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Bin Liu,et al.  Strategies to jointly optimize spect collimator and reconstruction parameters for a detection task , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[34]  Jie Yao,et al.  Predicting human performance by a channelized Hotelling observer model , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[35]  Eric C Frey,et al.  Optimization of energy window for 90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT imaging for detection tasks using the ideal observer with model-mismatch. , 2013, Medical physics.

[36]  Xin He,et al.  Toward Realistic and Practical Ideal Observer (IO) Estimation for the Optimization of Medical Imaging Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[37]  Matthew A. Kupinski,et al.  Ideal-Observer Performance under Signal and Background Uncertainty , 2003, IPMI.

[38]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Aperture optimization for emission imaging: effect of a spatially varying background. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[39]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  Improved SPECT quantification using compensation for scattered photons. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[40]  Eric C Frey,et al.  Optimum compensation method and filter cutoff frequency in myocardial SPECT: a human observer study. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  Application of task-based measures of image quality to optimization and evaluation of three-dimensional reconstruction-based compensation methods in myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[42]  C A Roe,et al.  Statistical Comparison of Two ROC-curve Estimates Obtained from Partially-paired Datasets , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[43]  P. Khurd,et al.  Channelized hotelling and human observer study of optimal smoothing in SPECT MAP reconstruction , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[44]  I Buvat,et al.  Impact of scatter correction in planar scintimammography: a phantom study. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[45]  E C Frey,et al.  Simultaneous technetium-99m/thallium-201 SPECT imaging with model-based compensation for cross-contaminating effects. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[46]  E C Frey,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic evaluation of iterative reconstruction with attenuation correction in 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial SPECT images. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.