Numerical and experimental study of the interaction between two marine current turbines

Abstract The understanding of interaction effects between marine energy converters represents the next step in the research process that should eventually lead to the deployment of such devices. Although some a priori considerations have been suggested recently, very few real condition studies have been carried out concerning this issue. Trials were run on 1/30th scale models of three-bladed marine current turbine prototypes in a flume tank. The present work focuses on the case where a turbine is placed at different locations in the wake of a first one. The interaction effects in terms of performance and wake of the second turbine are examined and compared to the results obtained on the case of one single turbine. Besides, a three-dimensional software, based on a vortex method is currently being developed, and will be used in the near future to model more complex layouts. The experimental study shows that the second turbine is deeply affected by the presence of an upstream device and that a compromise between individual device performance and inter-device spacing is necessary. Numerical results show good agreement with the experiment and are promising for the future modelling of turbine farms.

[1]  Serge Huberson,et al.  Vortex method for simulation of a 3D round jet in a cross-stream , 2005 .

[2]  Grégory Pinon,et al.  Experimental characterisation of flow effects on marine current turbine behaviour and on its wake properties , 2010 .

[3]  G. Germain,et al.  Wake properties characterisation of marine current turbines , 2010 .

[4]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  Vortex Methods: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[5]  Grégoire Winckelmans,et al.  Contributions to vortex particle methods for the computation of three-dimensional incompressible unsteady flows , 1993 .

[6]  Paul Mycek,et al.  Experimental study of the turbulence intensity effects on marine current turbines behaviour. Part I: One single turbine , 2014 .

[7]  L. E. Myers,et al.  Inter-device spacing issues within wave and tidal energy converter arrays , 2010 .

[8]  Anthony F. Molland,et al.  The prediction of the hydrodynamic performance of marine current turbines , 2008 .

[9]  R. A. Antonia,et al.  Scale-by-scale energy budget on the axis of a turbulent round jet , 2005 .

[10]  Sander M. Calisal,et al.  Modeling of twin-turbine systems with vertical axis tidal current turbine: Part II—torque fluctuation , 2011 .

[11]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[12]  Paul Mycek,et al.  Numerical simulation of the wake of marine current turbines with a particle method , 2012 .

[13]  AbuBakr S. Bahaj,et al.  Experimental verifications of numerical predictions for the hydrodynamic performance of horizontal axis marine current turbines , 2007 .

[14]  Paul Mycek,et al.  Experimental study of the turbulence intensity effects on marine current turbines behaviour. Part II: Two interacting turbines , 2014 .

[15]  J. Baltazar,et al.  Hydrodynamic Analysis of a Horizontal Axis Marine Current Turbine With a Boundary Element Method , 2011 .

[16]  L. E. Myers,et al.  Analytical estimates of the energy yield potential from the Alderney Race (Channel Islands) using marine current energy converters , 2004 .

[17]  Arthouros Zervos,et al.  Three-dimensional free wake calculation of wind turbine wakes , 1988 .

[18]  A. Leonard.  Vortex methods for flow simulation , 1980 .

[19]  G. Germain,et al.  Numerical characterisation of the wake generated by marine current turbines farm , 2008 .

[20]  Serge Huberson,et al.  Vortex particle methods in aeroacoustic calculations , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[21]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[22]  C. Meneveau,et al.  Scale-Invariance and Turbulence Models for Large-Eddy Simulation , 2000 .