Geophysical applicability of atomic clocks: direct continental geoid mapping

SUMMARY The geoid is the true physical figure of the Earth, a particular equipotential surface of the Earth’s gravity field that accounts for the effect of all subsurface density variations. Its shape approximatesbest(inthesenseofleastsquares)themeanlevelofoceans,butthegeoidismore difficult to determine over continents. Satellite missions carry out distance measurements and derive the gravity field to provide geoid maps over the entire globe. However, they require calibrationandextensive computations includingintegration,whichisanon-unique operation. Hereweproposeadirectmethodandanewtoolthatdirectlymeasuresgeopotentialdifferences on continents using atomic clocks. General relativity theory predicts constant clock rate at sea level, and faster (slower) clock rate above (below) sea level. The technology of atomic clocks is on the doorstep of reaching an accuracy level in clock rate (frequency ratio inaccuracy of 10 −18 ), which is equivalent to 1 cm in determining equipotential surface (including geoid) height. We discuss the value and future applicability of such measurements including direct geoid mapping on continents, and joint gravity–geopotential surveying to invert for subsurface density anomalies. Our synthetic calculations show that the geoid perturbation caused by a 1.5km radius sphere with 20 per cent density anomaly buried at 2km depth in the Earth’s crust is already detectable by atomic clocks of achievable accuracy. Therefore atomic clock geopotential surveys, used together with relative gravity data to benefit from their different depth sensitivities, can become a useful tool in mapping density anomalies within the Earth.

[1]  V. Dzuba,et al.  Single-ion nuclear clock for metrology at the 19th decimal place. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[2]  Oliver Montenbruck,et al.  The ACES mission: System development and test status , 2011 .

[3]  F. Sansò,et al.  First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches , 2011 .

[4]  A. Jäggi,et al.  Combined satellite gravity field model GOCO01S derived from GOCE and GRACE , 2010 .

[5]  D. Wineland,et al.  Optical Clocks and Relativity , 2010, Science.

[6]  D. Wineland,et al.  Frequency comparison of two high-accuracy Al+ optical clocks. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[7]  K. Djerroud,et al.  A coherent optical link through the turbulent atmosphere , 2010, EFTF-2010 24th European Frequency and Time Forum.

[8]  Hyung Rae Kim,et al.  GRACE gravity evidence for an impact basin in Wilkes Land, Antarctica , 2009 .

[9]  N. Newbury,et al.  Coherent transfer of an optical carrier over 251 km. , 2007, Optics letters.

[10]  Time too good to be true , 2006 .

[11]  Rolf König,et al.  CHAMP Mission 5 Years in Orbit , 2006 .

[12]  M. Watkins,et al.  The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results , 2004 .

[13]  Peter Wolf,et al.  Relativistic theory for time and frequency transfer to order c -3 , 2000, gr-qc/0010108.

[14]  Gerard Petit,et al.  Relativistic theory for clock syntonization and the realization of geocentric coordinate times. , 1995 .

[15]  P. Wolf,et al.  Relativistic theory for picosecond time transfer in the vicinity of Earth , 1994 .

[16]  A. Bjerhammar,et al.  On a relativistic geodesy , 1985 .

[17]  J. Marsh,et al.  The Seasat altimeter mean sea surface model , 1982 .

[18]  S. Gupta,et al.  GRAVITATIONAL ATTRACTION OF A RECTANGULAR PARALLELEPIPED , 1977 .

[19]  J. Coggon,et al.  Magnetic and gravity anomalies of polyhedra , 1976 .