Problems with geoengineering schemes to combat climate change

The accelerated rate of increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration in recent years has revived the idea of stabilizing the global climate through geoengineering schemes. Majority of the proposed geoengineering schemes will attempt to reduce the amount of solar radiation absorbed by our planet. Climate modelling studies of these so called 'sunshade geoengineering schemes' show that global warming from increasing concentrations of CO2 can be mitigated by intentionally manipulating the amount of sunlight absorbed by the climate system. These studies also suggest that the residual changes could be large on regional scales, so that climate change may not be mitigated on a local basis. More recent modelling studies have shown that these schemes could lead to a slow-down in the global hydrological cycle. Other problems such as changes in the terrestrial carbon cycle and ocean acidification remain unsolved by sunshade geoengineering schemes. In this article, I review the proposed geoengineering schemes, results from climate models and discuss why geoengineering is not the best option to deal with climate change.

[1]  B. Metz IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[2]  J. Latham,et al.  Computational assessment of a proposed technique for global warming mitigation via albedo-enhancement of marine stratocumulus clouds , 2006 .

[3]  D. Schrag Preparing to Capture Carbon , 2007, Science.

[4]  Peter M. Haugan,et al.  Sequestration of C02 in the deep ocean by shallow injection , 1992, Nature.

[5]  David William Keith Geoengineering the Climate: History and Prospect 1 , 2000, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[6]  D. Randall,et al.  Outlook for research on subtropical marine stratiform clouds , 1984 .

[7]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate CO2‐induced climate change , 2000 .

[8]  S. Schneider,et al.  Can Large-Scale Climatic Models Be Linked with Multiscale Ecological Studies? * , 1993 .

[9]  B. Seibel,et al.  Potential Impacts of CO 2 Injection on Deep-Sea Biota , 2001 .

[10]  Paul J. Valdes,et al.  “Sunshade World”: A fully coupled GCM evaluation of the climatic impacts of geoengineering , 2008 .

[11]  B. Albrecht Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness , 1989, Science.

[12]  A. Witze,et al.  Energy alternatives: Electricity without carbon , 2008, Nature.

[13]  Georgiy L. Stenchikov,et al.  Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections , 2008 .

[14]  W. Washington,et al.  An Introduction to Three-Dimensional Climate Modeling , 1986 .

[15]  K. Caldeira,et al.  Multicentury Changes to the Global Climate and Carbon Cycle: Results from a Coupled Climate and Carbon Cycle Model , 2005 .

[16]  Jeffrey T. Kiehl,et al.  Geoengineering climate Change: Treating the symptom over the cause? , 2006 .

[17]  W. B. Gail Climate control , 2007 .

[18]  S. Fitzwater,et al.  Iron in Antarctic waters , 1990, Nature.

[19]  T. Wigley,et al.  A Combined Mitigation/Geoengineering Approach to Climate Stabilization , 2006, Science.

[20]  K. Taylor,et al.  Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  U. Siegenthaler,et al.  Estimates of the effect of Southern Ocean iron fertilization on atmospheric CO2 concentrations , 1991, Nature.

[22]  K. Caldeira,et al.  Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  R. Angel Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1) , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  A. Watson,et al.  Minimal effect of iron fertilization on sea-surface carbon dioxide concentrations , 1994, Nature.

[25]  L. Bengtsson Geo-Engineering to Confine Climate Change: Is it at all Feasible? , 2006 .

[26]  A. Robock Whither Geoengineering? , 2008, Science.

[27]  E. Teller,et al.  Global warming and ice ages: I. prospects for physics based modulation of global change , 1996 .

[28]  K. Caldeira,et al.  Oceanography: Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH , 2003, Nature.

[29]  Philip B. Duffy,et al.  Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate climate change from a quadrupling of CO2 , 2003 .

[30]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Earth systems engineering and management , 2001, Nature.

[31]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Transient climate–carbon simulations of planetary geoengineering , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Philip B. Duffy,et al.  Impact of geoengineering schemes on the terrestrial biosphere , 2002 .

[33]  M. Hoffert,et al.  To Bury or to Burn: Optimum Use of Crop Residues to Reduce Atmospheric CO2 , 2002 .

[34]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  M. Lawrence The Geoengineering Dilemma: To Speak or not to Speak , 2006 .

[36]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  Exploring the geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulfate aerosols: The role of particle size , 2008 .

[37]  J. Latham,et al.  Control of global warming? , 1990, Nature.

[38]  W. Seifritz,et al.  Mirrors to halt global warming? , 1989, Nature.

[39]  M. Maccracken Geoengineering: Worthy of Cautious Evaluation? , 2006 .

[40]  N. Roberts,et al.  An observational study of multiple cloud head structure in the FASTEX IOP 16 cyclone , 2002 .

[41]  P. Crutzen Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? , 2006 .

[42]  Ralph J. Cicerone Geoengineering: Encouraging Research and Overseeing Implementation , 2006 .