Dynamic bioreactors with integrated microfabricated devices for mechanobiological screening.

Biomechanical stimulation is a common strategy to improve the growth, maturation, and function of a variety of types of engineered tissues. However, identifying optimized biomechanical conditioning protocols is challenging, as cell response to mechanical stimuli are modulated by other multifactorial microenvironmental cues, including soluble factors and biomaterial properties. Traditional bioreactors lack the throughput necessary for combinatorial testing of cell activity in mechanically-stimulated engineered tissues. Microfabricated systems can improve experimental throughput, but often do not provide uniform mechanical loading, are challenging to use, lack robustness, and offer limited amounts of cells and tissue for analysis. To address the need for higher-throughput, combinatorial testing of cell activity in a tissue engineering context, we developed a hybrid approach, in which flexible polydimethylsiloxane microfabricated inserts were designed to simultaneously generate multiple tensile strains when stretched cyclically in a standard dynamic bioreactor. In the embodiment presented here, each insert contained an array of 35 dog bone-shaped wells in which cell-seeded microscale hydrogels can be polymerized, with up to eight inserts stretched simultaneously in the bioreactor. Uniformity of the applied strains, both along the length of a microtissue and across multiple microtissues at the same strain level, was confirmed experimentally. In proof-of-principle experiments, the combinatorial effects of dynamic strain, biomaterial stiffness, and TGF-β1 stimulation on myofibroblast differentiation were tested, revealing both known and novel interaction effects and suggesting tissue engineering strategies to regulate myofibroblast activation. This platform is expected to have wide applicability in systematically probing combinations of mechanobiological tissue engineering parameters for desired effects on cell fate and tissue function.

[1]  Xu Zhang,et al.  Micromechanical stimulator for localized cell loading: fabrication and strain analysis , 2012 .

[2]  Yu Sun,et al.  A microfabricated platform for high-throughput unconfined compression of micropatterned biomaterial arrays. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[3]  A. Desmoulière,et al.  The Myofibroblast: one function, multiple origins , 2010 .

[4]  Jonathan T Butcher,et al.  Aortic valve disease and treatment: the need for naturally engineered solutions. , 2011, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[5]  A. Chester,et al.  Molecular and functional characteristics of heart-valve interstitial cells , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Lina Zhang,et al.  Super stretchable hydrogel achieved by non-aggregated spherulites with diameters <5 nm , 2016, Nature Communications.

[7]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Chip-Based Comparison of the Osteogenesis of Human Bone Marrow- and Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells under Mechanical Stimulation , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  Il Keun Kwon,et al.  Mechanical stretching for tissue engineering: two-dimensional and three-dimensional constructs. , 2012, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[9]  Z. Suo,et al.  Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels , 2012, Nature.

[10]  Kristi S Anseth,et al.  Photocrosslinking of gelatin macromers to synthesize porous hydrogels that promote valvular interstitial cell function. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[11]  Michael S Sacks,et al.  Synergistic effects of cyclic tension and transforming growth factor-beta1 on the aortic valve myofibroblast. , 2007, Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology.

[12]  Andrew E. Pelling,et al.  A microscale anisotropic biaxial cell stretching device for applications in mechanobiology , 2013, Biotechnology Letters.

[13]  Satoshi Konishi,et al.  Development of a biochip with serially connected pneumatic balloons for cell-stretching culture , 2011 .

[14]  Frederick J Schoen,et al.  Dynamic and reversible changes of interstitial cell phenotype during remodeling of cardiac valves. , 2004, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[15]  J. Y. Sim,et al.  Integrated strain array for cellular mechanobiology studies , 2011, Journal of micromechanics and microengineering : structures, devices, and systems.

[16]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft Lithography. , 1998, Angewandte Chemie.

[17]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Microfabricated tissue gauges to measure and manipulate forces from 3D microtissues , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Yu Sun,et al.  Microdevice array-based identification of distinct mechanobiological response profiles in layer-specific valve interstitial cells. , 2013, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[19]  Yu Sun,et al.  Solving the shrinkage-induced PDMS alignment registration issue in multilayer soft lithography , 2009 .

[20]  J. P. Morgan,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 2005, Technometrics.

[21]  Ajit P. Yoganathan,et al.  An Ex Vivo Study of the Biological Properties of Porcine Aortic Valves in Response to Circumferential Cyclic Stretch , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Zannatul Ferdous,et al.  Design considerations and challenges for mechanical stretch bioreactors in tissue engineering , 2016, Biotechnology progress.

[23]  Y. Tung,et al.  Interaction between lung cancer cell and myofibroblast influenced by cyclic tensile strain. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[24]  Toshiro Ohashi,et al.  A new experimental system for simultaneous application of cyclic tensile strain and fluid shear stress to tenocytes in vitro , 2013, Biomedical microdevices.

[25]  C. Simmons,et al.  Cofilin is a marker of myofibroblast differentiation in cells from porcine aortic cardiac valves. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[26]  Wei Tan,et al.  Development and evaluation of microdevices for studying anisotropic biaxial cyclic stretch on cells , 2008, Biomedical microdevices.

[27]  Xu-Ming Xie,et al.  Highly stretchable and super tough nanocomposite physical hydrogels facilitated by the coupling of intermolecular hydrogen bonds and analogous chemical crosslinking of nanoparticles. , 2015, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[28]  J. Vacanti,et al.  Tissue engineering. , 1993, Science.

[29]  Christopher Moraes,et al.  Organs-on-a-Chip: A Focus on Compartmentalized Microdevices , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of tunable poly(ethylene glycol): gelatin methacrylate composite hydrogels. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[31]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Microscale technologies for tissue engineering and biology. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[33]  Craig A Simmons,et al.  Biomechanical conditioning of tissue engineered heart valves: Too much of a good thing? , 2016, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[34]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Individually programmable cell stretching microwell arrays actuated by a Braille display. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[35]  Yu Sun,et al.  Semi-confined compression of microfabricated polymerized biomaterial constructs , 2011 .

[36]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Growth Factors, Matrices, and Forces Combine and Control Stem Cells , 2009, Science.

[37]  Andrew K. Capulli,et al.  Combining Dynamic Stretch and Tunable Stiffness to Probe Cell Mechanobiology In Vitro , 2011, PloS one.

[38]  April M. Kloxin,et al.  Redirecting Valvular Myofibroblasts into Dormant Fibroblasts through Light-mediated Reduction in Substrate Modulus , 2012, PloS one.

[39]  Craig A Simmons,et al.  Calcification by Valve Interstitial Cells Is Regulated by the Stiffness of the Extracellular Matrix , 2009, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[40]  G M Whitesides,et al.  Fabrication of topologically complex three-dimensional microfluidic systems in PDMS by rapid prototyping. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[41]  G. Keller,et al.  The effect of cyclic stretch on maturation and 3D tissue formation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[42]  O. Jeong,et al.  Fabrication of a pneumatically-driven tensile stimulator , 2012 .

[43]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Directed 3D cell alignment and elongation in microengineered hydrogels. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[44]  Yu Sun,et al.  Microfabricated arrays for high-throughput screening of cellular response to cyclic substrate deformation. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[45]  D. Beebe,et al.  Three-dimensional micro-channel fabrication in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer , 2000, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[46]  Jan-Hung Chen,et al.  &bgr;-Catenin Mediates Mechanically Regulated, Transforming Growth Factor-&bgr;1–Induced Myofibroblast Differentiation of Aortic Valve Interstitial Cells , 2011, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[47]  Craig A Simmons,et al.  The aortic valve microenvironment and its role in calcific aortic valve disease. , 2011, Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology.

[48]  Aaron R Wheeler,et al.  A 3D microfluidic platform incorporating methacrylated gelatin hydrogels to study physiological cardiovascular cell-cell interactions. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[49]  Kristi S Anseth,et al.  In situ elasticity modulation with dynamic substrates to direct cell phenotype. , 2010, Biomaterials.