Sub-milliSievert (sub-mSv) CT colonography: a prospective comparison of image quality and polyp conspicuity at reduced-dose versus standard-dose imaging

[1]  Submilisievert ultralow-dose CT colonography using iterative reconstruction technique: a feasibility study , 2015, Acta radiologica.

[2]  David H. Kim,et al.  Prospective Trial for the Detection of Urolithiasis at Ultra-low- dose (Sub-mSv) Non-contrast CT: Direct Comparison against Routine Low-dose Reference Standard , 2015 .

[3]  P. Lefere,et al.  Image Quality Improvement in Submillisievert Computed Tomographic Colonography Using a Fast 3-dimensional Noise Reduction Method , 2014, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  Saint Louis,et al.  American Association of Physicists in Medicine , 2014 .

[5]  David H. Kim,et al.  Prospective evaluation of prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS) algorithm in abdominal CT: a comparison of reduced dose with standard dose imaging , 2014, Abdominal Imaging.

[6]  M. Vannier,et al.  BMI-based radiation dose reduction in CT colonography. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[7]  Kevin J Chang,et al.  Reducing radiation dose at CT colonography: decreasing tube voltage to 100 kVp. , 2013, Radiology.

[8]  Judy Yee,et al.  Dose reduction methods for CT colonography , 2013, Abdominal Imaging.

[9]  David H. Kim,et al.  Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  A. Bankier,et al.  Through the Looking Glass revisited: the need for more meaning and less drama in the reporting of dose and dose reduction in CT. , 2012, Radiology.

[11]  H. Venema,et al.  Effective radiation dose in CT colonography: is there a downward trend? , 2012, Academic radiology.

[12]  Eun Sun Lee,et al.  Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction and Veo: Assessment of Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance in CT Colonography at Various Radiation Doses , 2012, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[14]  Guang-Hong Chen,et al.  Reduced image noise at low-dose multidetector CT of the abdomen with prior image constrained compressed sensing algorithm. , 2011, Radiology.

[15]  Karen M Kuntz,et al.  Radiation-related cancer risks from CT colonography screening: a risk-benefit analysis. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Guang-Hong Chen,et al.  Dose reduction using prior image constrained compressed sensing (DR-PICCS) , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[17]  W. Kalender,et al.  Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. , 2010, Radiology.

[18]  William Pavlicek,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: A pilot study. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  D. Sahani,et al.  Reducing Abdominal CT Radiation Dose With Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[21]  Mikael Hellström,et al.  Evaluation of image quality and lesion perception by human readers on 3D CT colonography: comparison of standard and low radiation dose , 2010, European Radiology.

[22]  Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population , 2009 .

[23]  L. Tanoue.  Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure , 2009 .

[24]  J. Yee,et al.  Accuracy of ct colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers , 2009 .

[25]  K Nikolaou,et al.  Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population , 2008, Gut.

[26]  Jie Tang,et al.  Prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS): a method to accurately reconstruct dynamic CT images from highly undersampled projection data sets. , 2008, Medical physics.

[27]  William H. Judy,et al.  The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT , 2008 .

[28]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  D. Altman,et al.  Agreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per Individual , 2007, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[30]  C. Becker,et al.  Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  David J Brenner,et al.  Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? , 2005, Gastroenterology.

[32]  F. M. Vos,et al.  CT colonography: feasibility of substantial dose reduction--comparison of medium to very low doses in identical patients. , 2004, Radiology.

[33]  J. Saurin,et al.  [Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults]. , 2004, Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique.

[34]  Carlo Catalano,et al.  Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multislice CT colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions: preliminary experience , 2003, European Radiology.

[35]  V. Carey,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus , 2001 .

[36]  J. Bourland.  American Association of Physicists in Medicine , 2001 .

[37]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[38]  S. Webb.  The Physics of Medical Imaging , 1990 .