A study on seismic behaviour of masonry mosques after restoration

Historical masonry structures have an important value for cultures and it is essential for every society to strengthen them and confidently transfer to the future. For this reason, determination of the seismic earthquake response, which is the most affecting factor to cause the damage at these structures, gain more importance. In this paper, the seismic earthquake behaviour of Kaya Celebi Mosque, which is located in Turkey and the restoration process has still continued after 2011 Van earthquake, is determined. Firstly the dynamic modal analysis and subsequently the seismic spectral analysis are performed using the finite element model of the mosque constructed with restoration drawings in SAP2000 program. Maximum displacements, tensile, compressive and shear stresses are obtained and presented with contours diagrams. Turkish Earthquake Code and its general technical specifications are considered to evaluate the structural responses. After the analyses, it is seen that the displacements and compressive/shear stresses within the code limits. However, tension stresses exceeded the maximum values at some local regions. For this mosque, this is in tolerance limits considering the whole structure. But, it can be said that the tension stresses is very important for this type of the structures, especially between the stone and mortar. So, some additional strengthening solutions considering the originality of historical structures may be applicable on maximum tensile regions.

[1]  Salvatore Russo,et al.  Influence of the annex on seismic behavior of historic churches , 2014 .

[2]  Nicola Augenti,et al.  Earthquake damages to cultural heritage constructions and simplified assessment of artworks , 2013 .

[3]  Alemdar Bayraktar,et al.  Damages of minarets during Erciş and Edremit Earthquakes, 2011 in Turkey , 2014 .

[4]  Terrence F. Paret,et al.  Using traditional and innovative approaches in the seismic evaluation and strengthening of a historic unreinforced masonry synagogue , 2008 .

[5]  Temel Türker,et al.  Seismic Response of a Historical Masonry Minaret using a Finite Element Model Updated with Operational Modal Testing , 2011 .

[6]  Antonella Saisi,et al.  Post-earthquake diagnostic investigation of a historic masonry tower , 2015 .

[7]  Luca Pelà,et al.  Numerical analysis of structural damage in the church of the Poblet Monastery , 2015 .

[8]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Simplified indexes for the seismic vulnerability of ancient masonry buildings , 2006 .

[9]  Alemdar Bayraktar,et al.  Performance of Masonry Stone Buildings during the March 25 and 28, 2004 Aşkale (Erzurum) Earthquakes in Turkey , 2007 .

[10]  Carmelo Gentile,et al.  Post-earthquake continuous dynamic monitoring of the Gabbia Tower in Mantua, Italy , 2015 .

[11]  Giuseppe Brandonisio,et al.  Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake , 2013 .

[12]  Giuseppe Brandonisio,et al.  Seismic damage and performance of Palazzo Centi after L’Aquila earthquake: A paradigmatic case study of effectiveness of mechanical steel ties , 2013 .