Estimating a size‐specific dose for helical head CT examinations using Monte Carlo simulation methods

PURPOSE Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) conversion factors have been determined by AAPM Report 204 to adjust CTDIvol to account for patient size but were limited to body CT examinations. The purpose of this work was to determine conversion factors that could be used for an SSDE for helical, head CT examinations for patients of different sizes. METHODS Validated Monte Carlo (MC) simulation methods were used to estimate dose to the center of the scan volume from a routine, helical head examination for a group of patient models representing a range of ages and sizes. Ten GSF/ICRP voxelized phantom models and five pediatric voxelized patient models created from CT image data were used in this study. CT scans were simulated using a Siemens multidetector row CT equivalent source model. Scan parameters were taken from the AAPM Routine Head protocols for a fixed tube current (FTC), helical protocol, and scan lengths were adapted to the anatomy of each patient model. MC simulations were performed using mesh tallies to produce voxelized dose distributions for the entire scan volume of each model. Three tally regions were investigated: (1) a small 0.6 cc volume at the center of the scan volume, (2) 0.8-1.0 cm axial slab at the center of the scan volume, and (3) the entire scan volume. Mean dose to brain parenchyma for all three regions was calculated. Mean bone dose and a mass-weighted average dose, consisting of brain parenchyma and bone, were also calculated for the slab in the central plane and the entire scan volume. All dose measures were then normalized by CTDIvol for the 16 cm phantom (CTDIvol,16 ). Conversion factors were determined by calculating the relationship between normalized doses and water equivalent diameter (Dw ). RESULTS CTDIvol,16 -normalized mean brain parenchyma dose values within the 0.6 cc volume, 0.8-1.0 cm central axial slab, and the entire scan volume, when parameterized by Dw , had an exponential relationship with a coefficient of determination (R2 ) of 0.86, 0.84, and 0.88, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the conversion factors resulting from these three different tally regions. Exponential relationships between CTDIvol,16 -normalized mean bone doses had R2 values of 0.83 and 0.87 for the central slab and for the entire scan volume, respectively. CTDIvol,16 -normalized mass-weighted average doses had R2 values of 0.39 and 0.51 for the central slab and for the entire scan volume, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Conversion factors that describe the exponential relationship between CTDIvol,16 -normalized mean brain dose and a size metric (Dw ) for helical head CT examinations have been reported for two different interpretations of the center of the scan volume. These dose descriptors have been extended to describe the dose to bone in the center of the scan volume as well as a mass-weighted average dose to brain and bone. These may be used, when combined with other efforts, to develop an SSDE dose coefficients for routine, helical head CT examinations.

[1]  M. McNitt-Gray,et al.  Size-specific, scanner-independent organ dose estimates in contiguous axial and helical head CT examinations. , 2014, Medical physics.

[2]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Monte Carlo reference data sets for imaging research: Executive summary of the report of AAPM Research Committee Task Group 195. , 2015, Medical physics.

[3]  Nina Petoussi-Henss,et al.  The GSF family of voxel phantoms , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Samuel L Brady,et al.  Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) provides a simple method to calculate organ dose for pediatric CT examinations. , 2014, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[5]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  The feasibility of patient size-corrected, scanner-independent organ dose estimates for abdominal CT exams. , 2011, Medical physics.

[6]  K. P. Kim,et al.  Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study , 2012, The Lancet.

[7]  W E Bolch,et al.  Voxel-based models representing the male and female ICRP reference adult--the skeleton. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[8]  Michael F McNitt-Gray,et al.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  M. Cristy,et al.  Active bone marrow distribution as a function of age in humans. , 1981, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  J. Boone,et al.  Radiation Doses in Consecutive CT Examinations from Five University of California Medical Centers. , 2015, Radiology.

[11]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce. , 2008, Health physics.

[12]  C. Kirkby,et al.  Sci—Thur AM: YIS - 04: Gold Nanoparticle Enhanced Arc Radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo Feasibility Study , 2014 .

[13]  J J DeMarco,et al.  A CT-based Monte Carlo simulation tool for dosimetry planning and analysis. , 1998, Medical physics.

[14]  Rochester,et al.  Use of Water Equivalent Diameter for Calculating Patient Size and Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in CT: The Report of AAPM Task Group 220. , 2014, AAPM report.

[15]  Jonas Andersson,et al.  The dosimetric impact of including the patient table in CT dose estimates , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Michael F McNitt-Gray,et al.  Accuracy of Monte Carlo simulations compared to in-vivo MDCT dosimetry. , 2015, Medical physics.

[17]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  A method to generate equivalent energy spectra and filtration models based on measurement for multidetector CT Monte Carlo dosimetry simulations. , 2009, Medical physics.

[18]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Variability of surface and center position radiation dose in MDCT: Monte Carlo simulations using CTDI and anthropomorphic phantoms. , 2009, Medical physics.

[19]  J J DeMarco,et al.  A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  N Petoussi-Henss,et al.  Conversion Coefficients for Radiological Protection Quantities for External Radiation Exposures , 2010, Annals of the ICRP.