RECONSTRUCTING DNA COPY NUMBER BY PENALIZED ESTIMATION AND IMPUTATION.

Recent advances in genomics have underscored the surprising ubiquity of DNA copy number variation (CNV). Fortunately, modern genotyping platforms also detect CNVs with fairly high reliability. Hidden Markov models and algorithms have played a dominant role in the interpretation of CNV data. Here we explore CNV reconstruction via estimation with a fused-lasso penalty as suggested by Tibshirani and Wang [Biostatistics 9 (2008) 18-29]. We mount a fresh attack on this difficult optimization problem by the following: (a) changing the penalty terms slightly by substituting a smooth approximation to the absolute value function, (b) designing and implementing a new MM (majorization-minimization) algorithm, and (c) applying a fast version of Newton's method to jointly update all model parameters. Together these changes enable us to minimize the fused-lasso criterion in a highly effective way.We also reframe the reconstruction problem in terms of imputation via discrete optimization. This approach is easier and more accurate than parameter estimation because it relies on the fact that only a handful of possible copy number states exist at each SNP. The dynamic programming framework has the added bonus of exploiting information that the current fused-lasso approach ignores. The accuracy of our imputations is comparable to that of hidden Markov models at a substantially lower computational cost.

[1]  L. A. G. Dresel,et al.  Elementary Numerical Analysis , 1966 .

[2]  Samuel D. Conte,et al.  Elementary Numerical Analysis , 1980 .

[3]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[4]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[5]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Mathematical Models for Local Nontexture Inpaintings , 2002, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[6]  Kenny Q. Ye,et al.  Large-Scale Copy Number Polymorphism in the Human Genome , 2004, Science.

[7]  L. Feuk,et al.  Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[8]  R. Steele,et al.  Optimization , 2005, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[9]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso , 2005 .

[10]  D. Conrad,et al.  Global variation in copy number in the human genome , 2006, Nature.

[11]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Adaptive total variation image deconvolution: A majorization-minimization approach , 2006, 2006 14th European Signal Processing Conference.

[12]  C. Yau,et al.  QuantiSNP: an Objective Bayes Hidden-Markov Model to detect and accurately map copy number variation using SNP genotyping data , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  Ji Zhu,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS ORIGINAL PAPER doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm364 Data and text mining Analysis of array CGH data for cancer studies using , 2022 .

[14]  Joseph T. Glessner,et al.  PennCNV: an integrated hidden Markov model designed for high-resolution copy number variation detection in whole-genome SNP genotyping data. , 2007, Genome research.

[15]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  PATHWISE COORDINATE OPTIMIZATION , 2007, 0708.1485.

[16]  J. Buizer-Voskamp,et al.  Recurrent CNVs disrupt three candidate genes in schizophrenia patients. , 2008, American journal of human genetics.

[17]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Spatial smoothing and hot spot detection for CGH data using the fused lasso. , 2008, Biostatistics.

[18]  Zachary A. Szpiech,et al.  Genotype, haplotype and copy-number variation in worldwide human populations , 2008, Nature.

[19]  Thomas W. Mühleisen,et al.  Large recurrent microdeletions associated with schizophrenia , 2008, Nature.

[20]  Sharon J. Diskin,et al.  Adjustment of genomic waves in signal intensities from whole-genome SNP genotyping platforms , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  Joshua M. Korn,et al.  Integrated genotype calling and association analysis of SNPs, common copy number polymorphisms and rare CNVs , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[22]  K. Lange,et al.  Coordinate descent algorithms for lasso penalized regression , 2008, 0803.3876.

[23]  Ingo Ruczinski,et al.  Hidden Markov models for the assessment of chromosomal alterations using high-throughput SNP arrays. , 2008, The annals of applied statistics.

[24]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  1 Trend Filtering , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[25]  E. Candès,et al.  Near-ideal model selection by ℓ1 minimization , 2008, 0801.0345.

[26]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  A unified framework for high-dimensional analysis of $M$-estimators with decomposable regularizers , 2009, NIPS.

[27]  C. Sabatti,et al.  Markov Models for Inferring Copy Number Variations from Genotype Data on Illumina Platforms , 2009, Human Heredity.