A Habermasian analysis of the deliberative democratic potential of ICT-enabled services in Swedish municipalities

The aim of this article is to derive a critical standard against which institutional arrangements of e-government can be assessed in terms of democratic potential from Jürgen Habermas’ discursive model of deliberative democracy, and to illustrate how this standard can be applied through an assessment of the information and communication technology (ICT)-enabled services found on Swedish municipal websites. The assessment focuses on the potential of the ICT infrastructure to support deliberative democratic ideals and is based on a quantitative exploration of all 289 Swedish municipal websites. The results suggest that correctly designed ICT-enabled services have a deliberative democratic potential. But this does not overshadow the fact that the services existing today only to a limited extent support processes of social learning through rational argumentation, the core idea in Habermas’ discursive model of deliberative democracy.

[1]  P. Norris,et al.  The Internet in Europe: A New North-South Divide? , 2000 .

[2]  James Miller.  Legitimation Crisis , 1975, Telos.

[3]  Jo Steyaert,et al.  Local Governments Online and the Role of the Resident , 2000 .

[4]  J. Knight,et al.  Aggregation and Deliberation: On the Possibility of Democratic Legitimacy , 1994 .

[5]  Å. Grönlund,et al.  Emerging Infrastructures for E-democracy: In Search of Strong Inscriptions , 2003 .

[6]  S. Chambers,et al.  Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse , 1996 .

[7]  Jon Elster,et al.  THE MARKET AND THE FORUM : Three varieties of political theory , 2005 .

[8]  Hans Wiklund.  Arenas for Democratic Deliberation: Decision-Making in an Infrastructure Project in Sweden , 2002 .

[9]  B. Barber.  Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[10]  Bernard Manin,et al.  On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation , 1987 .

[11]  J. Habermas,et al.  Constitutional Democracy , 2001 .

[12]  Edmund F. Byrne,et al.  Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political , 1999 .

[13]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  Widening Information Gaps and Policies of Prevention , 2000 .

[14]  Rickard Öhrvall.  "Det digitala torget - en studie av kommunala debattforum på Internet" , 2002 .

[15]  A.J.L. van Hooff,et al.  Democracy, Ancient and Modern , 2004 .

[16]  Jonathan Rutherford,et al.  Cyberdemocracy: Technology, cities and civic networks , 1999 .

[17]  J. Bohman.  Communication, Ideology, and Democratic Theory , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[18]  R. Dahl.  A Preface to Democratic Theory , 1956 .

[19]  Natalie Fenton,et al.  New Media, Counter Publicity and the Public Sphere , 2003, New Media Soc..

[20]  P. Gustafsson.  The Order of E-Democracy: Internet and Democracy in Swedish Local Governments , 2002 .

[21]  J. Bohman,et al.  Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics , 1997 .

[22]  Anthony G. Wilhelm.  Virtual sounding boards: How deliberative is on‐line political discussion? , 1998 .

[23]  C. Pateman.  Participation and democratic theory , 1970 .

[24]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  Debating Deliberative Democracy , 2003 .

[25]  H. Pruijt,et al.  Social Capital and the Equalizing Potential of the Internet , 2002 .

[26]  B. Sweetman.  Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy , 1997 .

[27]  David Miller,et al.  Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice , 1992 .

[28]  Ivan Horrocks,et al.  Virtual Communities : New Public Spheres on the Internet? , 2000 .

[29]  L. Phipps.  NEW COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES - A conduit for social inclusion , 2000 .

[30]  William Wresch,et al.  Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[31]  Mike Nicholls,et al.  On the internet , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[32]  Agneta Ranerup,et al.  On-Line Forums as an Arena for Political Discussions , 1999, Digital Cities.

[33]  Benjamin R. Barber,et al.  The New Telecommunications Technology: Endless Frontier or the End of Democracy? , 1997 .

[34]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  The Internet, 1995-2000 , 2001, ArXiv.

[35]  Joachim Åström.  Digital demokrati? : Idéer och strategier i lokal IT-politik , 1999 .

[36]  Lewis A. Friedland.  Electronic democracy and the new citizenship , 1996 .

[37]  Damian Tambini,et al.  Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities and Civic Networks , 1998 .

[38]  G. Paquet,et al.  E-Governance and Smart Communities , 2001 .

[39]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[40]  王德伦.  英语-翻译-Internet , 2000 .

[41]  Fernanda Fuentes,et al.  Digital Democracy. Discourse and decision making in the information age , 2001 .

[42]  Greg Elmer.  A Diagram of Panoptic Surveillance , 2003, New Media Soc..

[43]  R. Putnam.  Democracies in flux : the evolution of social capital in contemporary society , 2003 .

[44]  Ivan Horrocks,et al.  Democratic Governance and New Technology: Technologically Mediated Innovations in Political Practice in Western Europe , 2000 .

[45]  H. Ono,et al.  Gender and the Internet , 2003 .

[46]  J. Habermas.  Three Normative Models of Democracy , 1994, Democracy and Difference.

[47]  Sinikka Sassi.  The Controversies of the Internet and the Revitalization of Local Political Life , 2000 .

[48]  J. Habermas.  Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action , 1990 .

[49]  Nicholas W. Jankowski,et al.  The promise and practice of public debate in cyberspace , 2000 .

[50]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  DEMOCRACY AND INFORMATION : A CASE STUDY OF NEW LOCAL GOVERNACE STRUCTURES IN BANGALORE , 2000 .

[51]  Michael Boss.  Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .

[52]  Book Review: Mapping Cyberspace: Social Research on the Electronic Frontier , 2001 .

[53]  Lincoln Dahlberg.  The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere , 2001 .

[54]  Pippa Norris,et al.  Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism , 2002 .

[55]  Mike Holderness,et al.  Who are the world's information-poor? , 1998 .

[56]  Joachim Åström.  Digital Democracy: Ideas, Intentions and Initiatives in Swedish Local Governments , 2004 .

[57]  J. Dryzek.  Critical theory as a research program , 1995 .

[58]  James E. Katz,et al.  Motivations for and barriers to Internet usage: results of a national public opinion survey , 1997, Internet Res..

[59]  Ben O'Loughlin,et al.  The Political Implications Of Digital Innovations: Trade-offs of democracy and liberty in the developed world , 2001 .

[60]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice , 2001 .

[61]  Jean Claude Burgelman,et al.  Regulating Access in the Information Society , 2000, New Media Soc..

[62]  Agneta Ranerup,et al.  Elektronisk förvaltning, elektronisk demokrati : visioner, verklighet, vidareutveckling , 2001 .

[63]  Hans K. Klein,et al.  Tocqueville in Cyberspace: Using the Internet for Citizen Associations , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[64]  P. Howard,et al.  Days and Nights on the Internet , 2001 .

[65]  Leah A. Lievrouw,et al.  Our Own Devices: Heterotopic Communication, Discourse and Culture in the Information Society , 1998, Inf. Soc..

[66]  J. Nye,et al.  Governance.com: Democracy in the Information Age , 2004 .

[67]  Elisabeth Richard,et al.  Tools of governance , 2005 .