ICEKAT: an interactive online tool for calculating initial rates from continuous enzyme kinetic traces

Background Continuous enzyme kinetic assays are often used in high-throughput applications, as they allow rapid acquisition of large amounts of kinetic data and increased confidence compared to discontinuous assays. However, data analysis is often rate-limiting in high-throughput enzyme assays, as manual inspection and selection of a linear range from individual kinetic traces is cumbersome and prone to user error and bias. Currently available software programs are specialized and designed for the analysis of complex enzymatic models. Despite the widespread use of initial rate determination for processing kinetic data sets, no simple and automated program existed for rapid analysis of initial rates from continuous enzyme kinetic traces. Results An Interactive Continuous Enzyme Kinetics Analysis Tool (ICEKAT) was developed for semi-automated calculation of initial rates from continuous enzyme kinetic traces with particular application to the evaluation of Michaelis-Menten and EC 50 /IC 50 kinetic parameters, as well as the results of high-throughput screening assays. ICEKAT allows users to interactively fit kinetic traces using convenient browser-based selection tools, ameliorating tedious steps involved in defining ranges to fit in general purpose programs like Microsoft Excel and Graphpad Prism, while still maintaining simplicity in determining initial rates. As a test case, we quickly analyzed over 500 continuous enzyme kinetic traces resulting from experimental data on the response of the protein lysine deacetylase SIRT1 to small-molecule activators. Conclusions ICEKAT allows simultaneous visualization of individual initial rate fits and the resulting Michaelis-Menten or EC 50 /IC 50 kinetic model fits, as well as hits from high-throughput screening assays. In addition to serving as a convenient program for practicing enzymologists, ICEKAT is also a useful teaching aid to visually demonstrate in real-time how incorrect initial rate fits can affect calculated Michaelis-Menten or EC 50 /IC 50 kinetic parameters. For the convenience of the research community, we have made ICEKAT freely available online at https://icekat.herokuapp.com/icekat .

[1]  Brian C. Smith,et al.  Human sirtuins are differentially sensitive to inhibition by nitrosating agents and other cysteine oxidants , 2020, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  C T Zimmerle,et al.  Analysis of progress curves by simulations generated by numerical integration. , 1989, The Biochemical journal.

[3]  Brian C. Smith,et al.  A continuous microplate assay for sirtuins and nicotinamide-producing enzymes. , 2009, Analytical biochemistry.

[4]  Dudley Lamming,et al.  Evidence for a Common Mechanism of SIRT1 Regulation by Allosteric Activators , 2013, Science.

[5]  A. Cornish-Bowden,et al.  The use of the direct linear plot for determining initial velocities. , 1975, The Biochemical journal.

[6]  Pedro M Martins,et al.  Enzyme kinetics: the whole picture reveals hidden meanings , 2015, The FEBS journal.

[7]  N. Hariharan,et al.  Silent Information Regulator 1 Protects the Heart From Ischemia/Reperfusion , 2010, Circulation.

[8]  F. Jiang,et al.  Crystallographic structure of a small molecule SIRT1 activator-enzyme complex , 2014, Nature Communications.

[9]  A. Jerfy,et al.  The determination of the initial velocity of enzyme-catalysed reactions. , 1974, Analytical biochemistry.

[10]  Matej Praprotnik,et al.  ENZO: A Web Tool for Derivation and Evaluation of Kinetic Models of Enzyme Catalyzed Reactions , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  F. Satterstrom,et al.  From Sirtuin Biology to Human Diseases: An Update* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  R. Duggleby Estimation of the initial velocity of enzyme-catalysed reactions by non-linear regression analysis of progress curves. , 1985, The Biochemical journal.

[13]  G. Schreiber,et al.  Direct determination of enzyme kinetic parameters from single reactions using a new progress curve analysis tool , 2016, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[14]  Peter J. Halling,et al.  Standards for Reporting Enzyme Data: The STRENDA Consortium: What it aims to do and why it should be helpful , 2014 .

[15]  Weiping Lu,et al.  A logarithmic approximation to initial rates of enzyme reactions. , 2003, Analytical biochemistry.

[16]  Hualiang Jiang,et al.  Structural basis for allosteric, substrate-dependent stimulation of SIRT1 activity by resveratrol , 2015, Genes & development.

[17]  Y. Cheng,et al.  Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. , 1973, Biochemical pharmacology.

[18]  D. Sinclair,et al.  Small molecule SIRT1 activators for the treatment of aging and age-related diseases. , 2014, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[19]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[20]  Brian C. Smith,et al.  Mechanism of Human SIRT1 Activation by Resveratrol* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  S. Schnell,et al.  Closed Form Solution for Time-dependent Enzyme Kinetics , 1997 .

[22]  F. Fritsch,et al.  Solution of the transcendental equation wew = x , 1973, CACM.

[23]  P. Kuzmič,et al.  Program DYNAFIT for the analysis of enzyme kinetic data: application to HIV proteinase. , 1996, Analytical biochemistry.

[24]  John M. Cunningham,et al.  The Deacetylase SIRT1 Promotes Membrane Localization and Activation of Akt and PDK1 During Tumorigenesis and Cardiac Hypertrophy , 2011, Science Signaling.

[25]  R. Goody,et al.  The original Michaelis constant: translation of the 1913 Michaelis-Menten paper. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[26]  J. Denu,et al.  Sirtuin Catalysis and Regulation* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.