Know-how-, Experience- and Competition-related Considerations in Foreign Market Entry: an Exploratory Investigation

With increasing globalization, the foreign market entry decision has come to acquire increasing strategic significance. This study is based on information drawn directly from managers through in-depth interviews. Drawing from the literature, an investigation was conducted into the manner in which know-how-, experience- and competition-related issues influenced multinational firms' recent foreign market entry decisions, the kinds of concerns managers had regarding their partners and how they dealt with these concerns. The results of the interviews clarify some of confusion in the literature regarding the way in which know-how-related considerations influence market entry preferences and, relatedly, the centrality of opportunism in this decision. They also provide some insight into why prior large-scale statistical studies on foreign market entry have yielded mixed results. Broadly speaking, the results suggest that competitive forces and the capabilities of the firm are increasingly dominant factors influencing firms' entry decisions and driving them towards collaborations. Two interesting findings were the apparent lack of concern with opportunism and the predominant emphasis on the benefits of collaboration rather than the costs. While the efficient exploitation of the know-how may create some pressures towards internalization, its tacit nature also shields the firm from opportunism, thereby mitigating apprehensions about collaborating. In general, the findings of this paper demonstrate the need to re-examine key issues fundamental to foreign market entry and the desirability of shifting the focus of the approach to these issues from cost to value. Basically, the constraints posed by the bounded rationality of economic actors outweigh the constraints posed by opportunistic behavior and, in this light, know-how-related considerations are mediated by competition and capability-related considerations. Accordingly, the paper urges a shift in emphasis from opportunism to capability-related issues and concerns, these being especially critical in today's intensely competitive business environment.

[1]  John W. Clarr Cooperative Strategies in International Business , 1990 .

[2]  M. Porter Competition in Global Industries , 1986 .

[3]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[4]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  Do you really have a global strategy , 1985 .

[5]  Frederick T. Knickerbocker Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Enterprise , 1973 .

[6]  Arvind Parkhe “Messy” Research, Methodological Predispositions, and Theory Development in International Joint Ventures , 1993 .

[7]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link , 1990 .

[8]  J. Hennart,et al.  A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures , 1988 .

[9]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation methods , 1981 .

[10]  H. Gatignon,et al.  The multinational corporation's degree of control over foreign subsidiaries : an empirical test of a transaction cost explanation , 1988 .

[11]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[12]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[13]  J. Hagedoorn Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[14]  E. Graham Oligopolistic imitation and European direct investment in the United States , 1974 .

[15]  M. Casson,et al.  The future of the multinational enterprise , 1977 .

[16]  G. Hamel Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[17]  A. Madhok Crossroads---The Organization of Economic Activity: Transaction Costs, Firm Capabilities, and the Nature of Governance , 1996 .

[18]  K. R. Conner A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[19]  R. Hall The strategic analysis of intangible resources , 1992 .

[20]  A. Madhok COST, VALUE AND FOREIGN MARKET ENTRY MODE: THE TRANSACTION AND THE FIRM , 1997 .

[21]  S. Ghoshal Global strategy: An organizing framework , 1987 .

[22]  G. Hedlund The hypermodern MNC—A heterarchy? , 1986 .

[23]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[24]  R. Lamb,et al.  Competitive strategic management , 1984 .

[25]  Stephen Tallman Strategic management models and resource-based strategies among mnes in a host market , 1991 .

[26]  R. Vernon International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .

[27]  S. Lall,et al.  The Monopolistic Advantages of Multinationals: Lessons from Foreign Investment in the U.S , 1982 .

[28]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[29]  Ashoka Mody,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 20 (1993) lSlLl70. North-Holland Learning through alliances , 1991 .

[30]  C. Galbraith,et al.  Towards a Theory of Multinational Enterprise , 1986 .

[31]  J. Dunning Explaining International Production , 1988 .

[32]  A. Rugman,et al.  NEW THEORIES OF THE MULTXNATIONAL ENTERPRISE: AN ASSESSMENT OF INTERNALIZATION THEORY , 1986 .

[33]  B. Kogut Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[34]  J. Hennart,et al.  Greenfield vs. Acquisition: The Strategy of Japanese Investors in the United States , 1993 .

[35]  B Kogut Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[36]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  How Global Companies Win Out , 1982 .

[37]  A. Rugman,et al.  Internalization as a general theory of foreign direct investment: A re-appraisal of the literature , 1980 .

[38]  Birgitta Swedenborg,et al.  The multinational operations of Swedish firms , 1979 .

[39]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[40]  S. Ramaswami,et al.  Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: Impact of Ownership, Location and Internalization Factors , 1992 .

[41]  C. P. Rao,et al.  Service Firms’ International Entry-Mode Choice: A Modified Transaction-Cost Analysis Approach , 1993 .

[42]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[43]  D. Campbell The Informant in Quantitative Research , 1955, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  Benjamin Gomes-Casseres,et al.  Ownership structures of foreign subsidiaries : Theory and evidence , 1989 .

[45]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[46]  D. Mcfetridge Foreign investment, technology and economic growth , 1991 .

[47]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[48]  Peter Hwang,et al.  An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode , 1990 .

[49]  Franklin R. Root,et al.  Entry strategies for international markets , 1986 .

[50]  R. Caves International Corporations: The Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment , 1971 .

[51]  K. R. Harrigan Joint ventures and competitive strategy , 1988 .

[52]  W. C. Kim,et al.  Global Strategy and Multinationals' Entry Mode Choice , 1992 .

[53]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[54]  H. Gatignon,et al.  Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions , 1986 .

[55]  W. Davidson,et al.  Key Characteristics in the Choice of International Technology Transfer Mode , 1985 .

[56]  R. T. Beaty,et al.  The competitive challenge , 1993 .

[57]  J. Pennings Organizational strategy and change , 1985 .

[58]  Anoop Madhok,et al.  Opportunism and trust in joint venture relationships: an exploratory study and a model , 1995 .

[59]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[60]  J. Hennart,et al.  A Theory of the Multinational Enterprise , 1982 .

[61]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.