Prediction of non-linear ship responses in waves considering forward speed effects

This article describes the development of a non-linear time-domain boundary element method to determine non-linear ship responses (motions and loads) in waves. The general approach by Cummins was used to express the equation of motion in the time domain. Hydrodynamic forces were split into inertia, radiation, diffraction, Froude–Krylov and restoring components. Radiation forces were determined in time domain by convolution of the impulse response of the ship with the motion velocity. The Froude–Krylov and restoring forces were computed over the instantaneous wetted surface, taking into account ship motions, the undisturbed wave and stationary wave system. Diffraction forces were computed from the complex force amplitude resulting from the linear problem of the incident wave diffraction. The impulse response of the ship can be determined using the linear hydrodynamic damping coefficients or added masses. In this work, these two approaches were compared. Ship motions calculated with the developed method were compared with model test and RANSE-based simulations as well as with linear frequency domain results for three different ship types at various forward speeds. It was shown that the convolution integral represents the radiation forces satisfactorily. The convolution integral based on damping coefficients showed distinct advantages at zero speed. With increasing forward speed, the added mass-based convolution integral leaded in some cases to better results.

[1]  Apostolos Papanikolaou,et al.  Time domain simulation of nonlinear ship motions using an impulse response function method , 2014 .

[2]  Petri Valanto,et al.  Experimental Investigation on Ship Wave Added Resistance in Regular Head, Oblique, Beam, and Following Waves , 2015 .

[3]  F Noblesse,et al.  NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF THE GREEN FUNCTION OF WATER-WAVE RADIATION AND DIFFRACTION , 1986 .

[4]  Tristan Perez,et al.  A derivation of high-frequency asymptotic values of 3D added mass and damping based on properties of the Cummins' equation , 2008 .

[5]  W. Cummins THE IMPULSE RESPONSE FUNCTION AND SHIP MOTIONS , 2010 .

[6]  W. E. Cummins,et al.  The Impulse Response Function and Ship Motion , 1962 .

[7]  Yasuyuki Toda,et al.  CFD verification and validation of added resistance and motions of KVLCC2 with fixed and free surge in short and long head waves , 2013 .

[8]  D Hachmann,et al.  CALCULATION OF PRESSURES ON A SHIP'S HULL IN WAVES , 1991 .

[9]  Ould el Moctar,et al.  Numerical Prediction of the Added Resistance of Ships in Waves , 2014 .

[10]  Ould el Moctar,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Investigations of Ship Maneuvers in Waves , 2016 .

[11]  丸尾 孟 1. F.Ogilvie (D.T.M.B.), Recent Progress Toward the Understanding and Prediction of Ship Motions , 1965 .

[12]  H Soding A METHOD FOR ACCURATE FORCE CALCULATIONS IN POTENTIAL FLOW , 1993 .

[13]  C. Soares,et al.  Time-Domain Analysis of Large-Amplitude Vertical Ship Motions and Wave Loads , 1998 .

[14]  Heinrich Söding Towards Fully Non-Linear Floating Body Simulations by a Potential Method , 2012 .

[15]  J. D. Wheeler,et al.  METHOD FOR CALCULATING FORCES PRODUCED BY IRREGULAR WAVES , 1970 .

[16]  David F. Rogers,et al.  THE SOCIETY OF NAVAL ARCHITECTS AND MARINE ENGINEERS , 1977 .

[17]  Vladimir Shigunov,et al.  Rankine Source Method for Seakeeping Predictions , 2012 .

[18]  Heinrich Söding Computation of springing transfer functions , 2009 .

[19]  Nils Salvesen,et al.  SHIP MOTIONS AND SEA LOADS , 1970 .

[20]  Volker Bertram,et al.  A 3-d Rankine Source Seakeeping Method , 2009 .