Gaze behaviour in front-of-shelf orientation

This study was predicated on gaze behaviour in front-of-shelf orientation. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the effect of the presence (absence) of competing brands on consumer attention in front-of-shelf orientation. The effects on visual attention investigated on the shelf were eye scan path of the total available area, information acquisition in extremities and mental effort.,Two experiments were performed using eye-tracking technology. The first study was conducted in a closed and static environment. The second study was performed in an open and dynamic environment. In these studies, the authors used, as an independent variable, the arrangement of brands on shelves (presence vs absence of competing) and evaluated the variations in the visual attention through three dependent variables: eye scan path of the total available area, information acquisition in extremities and mental effort.,Three hypotheses were tested. The first hypothesis confirmed that scenarios of competitive brands are rather composed of natural complex scenes, so there is a greater number of eye fixations needed to identify and locate objects. In addition, the second hypothesis demonstrated that, in scenarios of competitive brands, there is an acceleration of information acquisitions causing an increase in peripheral vision at the ends of the shelf. Finally, the third hypothesis demonstrated that the presence of a greater attention effort in the scenario of competing brands was verified, since the mental effort variables (revisiting the shelf, noting and re-examining) were greater than in the scenario of non-competing brands.,Limitations of this study may be associated with the absence of top-down factors and a lack of results associated with evaluation and verification phases.,Gaze behaviour is susceptible to the information derived from the absence and presence of competing brands.

[1]  Nils Magne Larsen,et al.  Consumer attention to price in social commerce: Eye tracking patterns in retail clothing☆ , 2016 .

[2]  Bill Page,et al.  Fundamental patterns of in-store shopper behavior , 2017 .

[3]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Does In-Store Marketing Work? Effects of the Number and Position of Shelf Facings on Brand Attention and Evaluation at the Point of Purchase , 2009 .

[4]  Mario J. Miranda,et al.  Determinants of shoppers' checkout behaviour at supermarkets , 2008 .

[5]  J. Goldenberg,et al.  The Role of Hubs in the Adoption Process , 2009 .

[6]  J. Macke,et al.  Quantifying the effect of intertrial dependence on perceptual decisions. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[7]  Melika Husic-Mehmedovic,et al.  Seeing is not necessarily liking: Advancing research on package design with eye-tracking ☆ , 2017 .

[8]  R. Pieters,et al.  Visual attention during brand choice : The impact of time pressure and task motivation , 1999 .

[9]  E. Thorson,et al.  The Effects of Television Videographics and Lecture Familiarity on Adult Cardiac Orienting Responses and Memory , 1992 .

[10]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Inferential Belief Formation in the Cue Utilization Process , 1978 .

[12]  Charles Spence,et al.  Using combined eye tracking and word association in order to assess novel packaging solutions: A case study involving jam jars , 2013 .

[13]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Display signs and involvement: the visual path to purchase intention , 2013 .

[14]  Jacob L. Orquin,et al.  Attention and choice: a review on eye movements in decision making. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[15]  C. Koch,et al.  Relative visual saliency differences induce sizable bias in consumer choice , 2012 .

[16]  Gregory S. Carpenter,et al.  Why Is the Trivial Important? A Reasons-Based Account for the Effects of Trivial Attributes on Choice , 2000 .

[17]  Daniele Scarpi The impact of decoys and background information on consumers' preferences and decision making , 2008 .

[18]  James L. Oakley,et al.  Order of Entry and the Moderating Role of Comparison Brands in Brand Extension Evaluation , 2008 .

[19]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Measuring the Value of Point-of-Purchase Marketing with Commercial Eye-Tracking Data , 2006 .

[20]  Jesper Clement,et al.  Decisive visual saliency and consumers׳ in-store decisions , 2015 .

[21]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  Effects of Context and Part-Category Cues on Recall of Competing Brands , 1985 .

[22]  Pedro Amorim,et al.  A framework for designing backroom areas in grocery stores , 2017 .

[23]  S. Loureiro Exploring the attractiveness of manufacturer brands and retailer own-brands in supermarket context , 2017 .

[24]  C. Koch,et al.  Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[25]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Eye Fixations on Advertisements and Memory for Brands: A Model and Findings , 2000 .

[27]  Natalia Rubio,et al.  Shelf management of store brands: analysis of manufacturers' perceptions , 2008 .

[28]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The relationship between indecisiveness and eye movement patterns in a decision making informational search task , 2009 .

[29]  Yu-Feng Huang,et al.  An Eye-Tracking Investigation of Internet Consumers' Decision Deliberateness , 2011, Internet Res..

[30]  Jung-Hwan Kim Imperative challenge for luxury brands , 2019, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management.

[31]  Bridget K. Behe,et al.  Incorporating Eye Tracking Technology and Conjoint Analysis to Better Understand the Green Industry Consumer , 2014 .

[32]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  Arnaud Bigoin-Gagnan,et al.  Symmetry influences packaging aesthetic evaluation and purchase intention , 2018, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management.

[34]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Social Cues Alter Implicit Motor Learning in a Serial Reaction Time Task , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[35]  Annie Lang,et al.  The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television messages , 1999 .

[36]  Annie Lang,et al.  The limited capacity model of mediated message processing , 2000 .

[37]  Bridget K. Behe,et al.  The effect of involvement on visual attention and product choice , 2015 .

[38]  Erik Wästlund,et al.  Vision (im)possible? The effects of in-store signage on customers' visual attention , 2014 .

[39]  Erik Wästlund,et al.  Heuristics and resource depletion: eye-tracking customers’ in situ gaze behavior in the field , 2015 .

[40]  Bridget K. Behe,et al.  Practical Field Use of Eye-tracking Devices for Consumer Research in the Retail Environment , 2013 .

[41]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Display Characteristics on Visual Exploratory Search Behavior , 1998 .

[42]  P Wright,et al.  Changes of Pupil Size and Rehearsal Strategies in a Short-Term Memory Task , 1971, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  Byron Reeves,et al.  MESSAGE COMPLEXITY AND ATTENTION TO TELEVISION , 1985 .

[44]  Raymond R. Burke,et al.  Competitive Interference and Consumer Memory for Advertising , 1988 .

[45]  Barbara Kaup,et al.  Do task-irrelevant direction-associated motion verbs affect action planning? Evidence from a Stroop paradigm , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[46]  J. Clement Visual influence on in-store buying decisions: an eye-track experiment on the visual influence of packaging design , 2007 .

[47]  Bill Page,et al.  Comparing two supermarket layouts: The effect of a middle aisle on basket size, spend, trip duration and endcap use , 2019, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[48]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  W. S. Peavler,et al.  Effects of verbalization and incentive on the pupil response to mental activity. , 1968, Canadian journal of psychology.

[50]  Byron Reeves,et al.  Negative video as structure: Emotion, attention, capacity, and memory , 1996 .

[51]  J. E. Russo,et al.  An Eye-Fixation Analysis of Choice Processes for Consumer Nondurables , 1994 .

[52]  Ulrich R. Orth,et al.  Verticality in product labels and shelves as a metaphorical cue to quality , 2017 .

[53]  Annie Lang,et al.  Defining Audio/Video Redundancy From a Limited- Capacity Information Processing Perspective , 1995 .

[54]  Vincent D Costa,et al.  Scan patterns when viewing natural scenes: emotion, complexity, and repetition. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[55]  Srinivasan Raghunathan,et al.  Retailer- vs. Vendor-Managed Inventory and Brand Competition , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[56]  Bridget K. Behe,et al.  Seeking attention: an eye tracking study of in-store merchandise displays , 2015 .

[57]  B. Velichkovsky,et al.  Time course of information processing during scene perception: The relationship between saccade amplitude and fixation duration , 2005 .

[58]  Markus H. Sneve,et al.  Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[59]  Bridget K. Behe,et al.  Inside-outside: Using eye-tracking to investigate search-choice processes in the retail environment , 2018, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[60]  B. Kahn,et al.  The "visual preference heuristic": The influence of visual versus verbal depiction on assortment processing, perceived variety, and choice overload , 2014 .

[61]  S. Iyengar,et al.  The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases Choosers' Perceptions of Assortment Variety and Outcome Satisfaction , 2008 .

[62]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Global and local covert visual attention: Evidence from a bayesian hidden markov model , 2003 .

[63]  D. Alais,et al.  Probing visual consciousness: rivalry between eyes and images. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[64]  Barbara E. Kahn,et al.  A “Wide” Variety: Effects of Horizontal versus Vertical Display on Assortment Processing, Perceived Variety, and Choice , 2016 .

[65]  J. May,et al.  Eye movement indices of mental workload. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[66]  Ralf van der Lans,et al.  Research Note - Competitive Brand Salience , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[67]  K. Vogeley,et al.  Toward a second-person neuroscience 1 , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.