Holistic face processing in newborns, 3-month-old infants, and adults: evidence from the composite face effect.

Holistic face processing was investigated in newborns, 3-month-old infants, and adults through a modified version of the composite face paradigm and the recording of eye movements. After familiarization to the top portion of a face, participants (N = 70) were shown 2 aligned or misaligned faces, 1 of which comprised the familiar top part. In the aligned condition, no visual preference was found at any group age. In the misaligned condition, 3-month-olds preferred the face stimulus with the familiar top part, adults preferred the face stimulus with the novel one, and newborns did not manifest any visual preference. Results revealed that both infants' and adults' eye movements may be affected by holistic face information and demonstrated holistic face processing in 3-month-olds.

[1]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[2]  C. Umilta,et al.  Face preference at birth. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Sridhar Mahadevan,et al.  14 - Gaze Control for Face Learning and Recognition by Humans and Machines , 2001 .

[4]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Holistic Processing of Faces in Preschool Children and Adults , 2003, Psychological science.

[5]  H. Hayne,et al.  The effect of familiarization time, retention interval, and context change on adults' performance in the visual paired-comparison task. , 2004, Developmental psychobiology.

[6]  Chiara Turati,et al.  Why Faces Are Not Special to Newborns , 2004 .

[7]  R. Bhatt,et al.  The Thatcher illusion and face processing in infancy. , 2004, Developmental science.

[8]  D. Maurer,et al.  The composite face effect in six-year-old children: Evidence of adult-like holistic face processing , 2007 .

[9]  Louise Hainline,et al.  The retina of the newborn human infant. , 1982, Science.

[10]  K. Durand,et al.  Qualitative differences in the exploration of upright and upside-down faces in four-month-old infants: an eye-movement study. , 2006, Child development.

[11]  F. D. Horowitz,et al.  An Infant Control Procedure for Studying Infant Visual Fixations. , 1972 .

[12]  L. Thompson,et al.  Infants attend to second-order relational properties of faces , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Recognition of individual faces and average face prototypes by 1- and 3-month-old infants , 2001 .

[14]  Leslie B. Cohen,et al.  Do 7-month-old infants process independent features or facial configurations? , 2001 .

[15]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  Eye movements are functional during face learning , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Paula C. Stacey,et al.  Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data. , 2005, British journal of psychology.

[18]  Denis Mareschal,et al.  Models of habituation in infancy , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Irene Leo,et al.  Newborns' face recognition: role of inner and outer facial features. , 2006, Child development.

[20]  R. Bhatt,et al.  Face processing in infancy: developmental changes in the use of different kinds of relational information. , 2005, Child development.

[21]  Chiara Turati,et al.  Evidence of the Face Inversion Effect in 4-Month-Old Infants. , 2004, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[22]  Denis Mareschal,et al.  An Interacting Systems Model of Infant Habituation , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Christine Deruelle,et al.  Do the right and left hemispheres attend to the same visuospatial information within a face in infancy , 1998 .

[24]  O. Mimura.  [Eye movements]. , 1992, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[25]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition. , 1991, Psychological review.

[26]  T. Bower,et al.  Faces as forms in the world of the newborn , 1997 .

[27]  Irene Leo,et al.  Three-month-olds' visual preference for faces and its underlying visual processing mechanisms. , 2005, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[28]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Newborn Infants' Preference for Attractive Faces: The Role of Internal and External Facial Features. , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[29]  Irene Leo,et al.  Face processing at birth: a Thatcher illusion study. , 2009, Developmental science.

[30]  G. Hole.  Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces , 1994, Perception.

[31]  Scania de Schonen,et al.  Responses to mother's face in 3‐week to 5‐month‐old infants , 2001 .

[32]  A. Slater,et al.  Pattern preferences at birth and their interaction with habituation-induced novelty preferences. , 1985, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[33]  Jane E Joseph,et al.  The development of expert face processing: are infants sensitive to normal differences in second-order relational information? , 2007, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[34]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[35]  C. Turati,et al.  Effect of partial occlusion on newborns' face preference and recognition. , 2008, Developmental science.

[36]  Janette Atkinson,et al.  Development of basic visual functions , 1989 .

[37]  Viola Macchi Cassia,et al.  Holistic processing for faces and cars in preschool-aged children and adults: evidence from the composite effect. , 2009, Developmental science.

[38]  N. J. Cohen,et al.  Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  B. Rossion,et al.  Holistic face processing can be independent of gaze behaviour: evidence from the composite face illusion. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[40]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Long-Term Recognition Memory for Faces Assessed by Visual Paired Comparison in 3- and 6-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[41]  John M Henderson,et al.  The face inversion effect is not a consequence of aberrant eye movements , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[42]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[43]  B. Rossion,et al.  Holistic face processing is mature at 4 years of age: evidence from the composite face effect. , 2007, Journal of experimental child psychology.