Standardizing flow cytometry: a classification system of fluorescence standards used for flow cytometry.

The growing number of standards commercially available in the field of flow cytometry makes it difficult to know which standards to use to obtain a desired level of quality assurance. A classification system of fluorescence standards has been developed on the basis of their physical characteristics. In turn, these physical characteristics determine the ability of the specific standards to perform selected functions, such as alignment, target referencing, compensation, and calibration. Knowing the properties and limitations of specific standards will help flow cytometer users to select the appropriate standard for the application that they will be performing, especially in regard to intra- and interlaboratory quality assurance. Common protocols used in conjunction with specific classifications of reference standards can provide unified analysis regions or window of analysis across different instruments and/or laboratories. In addition, specific classifications of calibration standards can help select those standards that will provide independent and direct comparison of instrument performance parameters, especially in studies involving multiple laboratories. Knowledge and understanding of the classification system can guide flow cytometer users in more efficient and accurate instrument setup and quality control when conducting research, as well as clinical applications.

[1]  P. Carayon,et al.  Cytofluorometric quantification of cell-surface antigens by indirect immunofluorescence using monoclonal antibodies. , 1985, Journal of immunological methods.

[2]  E. Voss,et al.  FITC-poly-D-lysine conjugates as fluorescent probes to quantify hapten-specific macrophage receptor binding and uptake kinetics. , 1998, Cytometry.

[3]  G. Stelzer,et al.  Interlaboratory comparison of flow cytometric lymphocyte phenotyping analyses: implications for standardization and quality control. , 1988, Cytometry. Supplement : the journal of the Society for Analytical Cytology.

[4]  B. Andersson,et al.  Determination of the antibody binding capacity of lymphocyte membrane antigens by flow cytometry in 58 blood donors. , 1995, Journal of immunological methods.

[5]  B. Brando,et al.  Nationwide quality control trial on lymphocyte immunophenotyping and flow cytometer performance in Italy. , 1993, Cytometry.

[6]  J. Ugelstad,et al.  Swelling of oligomer-polymer particles. New methods of preparation , 1980 .

[7]  A Schwartz,et al.  Standardizing flow cytometry: construction of a standardized fluorescence calibration plot using matching spectral calibrators. , 1996, Cytometry.

[8]  F. Lanza,et al.  Quantitation of hemopoietic cell antigens in flow cytometry. , 1996, European journal of histochemistry : EJH.

[9]  I. Penttilä,et al.  Use of quality control standards in clinical flow cytometry. , 1991, Annals of medicine.

[10]  A. Look,et al.  Prognostic significance of fluorescence intensity of surface marker expression in childhood B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A Pediatric Oncology Group Study. , 1997, Blood.

[11]  A Schwartz,et al.  Development of Clinical Standards for Flow Cytometry , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  T. Denny,et al.  Quantitative determination of surface antibody binding capacities of immune subsets present in peripheral blood of healthy adult donors. , 1996, Cytometry.

[13]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Applications of common quantitative fluorescent standards to multiple platforms: Comparison of commercial fluorescent calibration standards used in quantitative flow cytometry immunophenotyping analysis as a function of pH environment , 1997 .

[14]  H B Steen,et al.  Noise, sensitivity, and resolution of flow cytometers. , 1992, Cytometry.

[15]  P Reinders,et al.  Reduction of interlaboratory variability in flow cytometric immunophenotyping by standardization of instrument set-up and calibration, and standard list mode data analysis. , 1997, Cytometry.

[16]  R. Detels,et al.  Elevated relative fluorescence intensity of CD38 antigen expression on CD8+ T cells is a marker of poor prognosis in HIV infection: results of 6 years of follow-up. , 1996, Cytometry.

[17]  R. Zagursky,et al.  Quantitation of cellular receptors by a new immunocytochemical flow cytometry technique. , 1995, BioTechniques.

[18]  L O Henderson,et al.  Interlaboratory study of cellular fluorescence intensity measurements with fluorescein-labeled microbead standards. , 1991, Cytometry.

[19]  E. Wallace,et al.  Quantitative determination of antibody binding capacity (ABC) by flow cytometry. , 1994, European journal of histochemistry : EJH.

[20]  F. A. Vicente,et al.  PREPARATION OF LARGE-PARTICLE-SIZE MONODISPERSE LATEXES IN SPACE: POLYMERIZATION KINETICS AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT , 1984 .

[21]  L O Henderson,et al.  Model system evaluating fluorescein-labeled microbeads as internal standards to calibrate fluorescence intensity on flow cytometers. , 1989, Cytometry.