Behavior-Based Intervention for Occupational Safety: Critical Impact of Social Comparison Feedback

The relative impact of global, specific, and social comparison feedback on safety behaviors was assessed at a large soft-drink bottling Co. A 2 Feedback Level (Specific vs. Global) X 2 Feedback Type (Social Comparison Present vs. Not Present) analysis of covariance was used to test the hypothesis that specific, social comparison feedback would lead to the greatest improvement in percentage of safe behavior. Employees (n = 97) received behavioral safety training and then developed a critical behavior checklist (CBC) for their work areas. Researchers used the CBC to: (a) systematically categorize work behaviors throughout the plant as safe or at-risk, and (b) give employees written behavioral feedback each week. Social comparison feedback (SCF) led to significantly higher percent safe scores than did the No-SCF conditions (mean percent safe was 78% vs. 68%, respectively). Follow-up chi-square analyses and practical considerations suggest global/SCF is optimal for improving safety performance. Limitations of the study and future implications for safety feedback research are discussed.

[1]  W WitdeA.J..  Promoting Increased Use of Ear Protectors in Noise Through Information Feedback , 1981 .

[2]  Occupational injury prevention. , 1992, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[3]  Roger C. Jensen,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness of an industrial lift truck safety training program , 1984 .

[4]  Beth Sulzer Azaroff.  BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND ACCIDENT PREVENTION , 1980 .

[5]  E. Scott Geller,et al.  Developing efficient workplace safety programs: Observations of response covariation , 1993 .

[6]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[7]  Fabricio E. Balcazar,et al.  A Critical, Objective Review of Performance Feedback , 1985 .

[8]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Effects of normative information on task performance. , 1985 .

[9]  E. S. Geller,et al.  BEHAVIOR-BASED SAFETY : CONFUSION, CONTROVERSY, AND CLARIFICATION , 1999 .

[10]  Terry E. McSween,et al.  The values-based safety process : improving your safety culture with a behavioral approach , 1995 .

[11]  J. Komaki,et al.  The role of performance antecedents and consequences in work motivation. , 1982 .

[12]  D M Baer,et al.  An implicit technology of generalization. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[13]  Jon S. Bailey,et al.  Using Feedback and Reinforcement to Improve the Performance and Safety of a Roofing Crew , 1996 .

[14]  D M Baer,et al.  Some still-current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. , 1987, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[15]  E. Scott Geller,et al.  Applied Behavior Analysis and Occupational Safety , 2001 .

[16]  Robert A. Reber,et al.  Improving Safety Performance With Goal Setting and Feedback , 1990 .

[17]  B. Sulzer-Azaroff,et al.  The effects of performance feedback on the safety of client lifting and transfer. , 1986, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[18]  W K Anger,et al.  Behavioral technology for reducing occupational exposures to styrene. , 1986, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[19]  E. Scott Geller,et al.  The psychology of safety : how to improve behaviors and attitudes on the job , 1996 .

[20]  Injury prevention: meeting the challenge. The National Committee for Injury Prevention and Control. , 1989, American journal of preventive medicine.

[21]  J. Komaki,et al.  A behavioral approach to occupational safety: pinpointing and reinforcing safe performance in a food manufacturing plant. , 1978, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  An Examination of the Relative Impact of Normative Information and Self‐Efficacy on Personal Goals and Performance Over Time1 , 1992 .

[23]  C. Wrenn,et al.  In praise of PIDs. , 1999, Occupational health & safety.

[24]  Mark H. Moore,et al.  Injury prevention: Meeting the challenge , 1989 .

[25]  R. A. Phillips,et al.  Reducing accidents using goal setting and feedback: A field study , 1994 .

[26]  E S Geller,et al.  Assigned versus participative goal setting and response generalization: managing injury control among professional pizza deliverers. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  B. Sulzer-Azaroff,et al.  Industrial safety hazard reduction through performance feedback. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[28]  E. Scott Geller,et al.  Interventions to Improve Sanitation During Food Preparation , 1980 .

[29]  Ted R. Miller,et al.  Estimating the costs of injury to U.S. employers , 1997 .

[30]  Daniel B. Turban,et al.  Exploring the Role of Normative‐and Performance‐Based Feedback in Motivational Processes1 , 1996 .

[31]  Surgeon General,et al.  Healthy people : the Surgeon General's report on health promotion and disease prevention , 1979 .

[32]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  Individual and Group Feedback and Performance: An Attributional Perspective , 1991 .

[33]  J. Komaki,et al.  Effect of training and feedback: component analysis of a behavioral safety program. , 1980, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Theory and Research Concerning Social Comparisons of Personal Attributes , 2001 .

[35]  Thomas R. Krause,et al.  The Behavior-Based Safety Process: Managing Involvement for an Injury-Free Culture , 1990 .

[36]  James W. Smither,et al.  A Field Study of Reactions to Normative versus Individualized Upward Feedback , 1995 .

[37]  Beth Sulzer-Azaroff,et al.  Increasing industrial safety practices and conditions through posted feedback. , 1984 .

[38]  D M Baer,et al.  Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.