Critical Connections: Personal Learning Environments and Information Literacy

Personal learning environments (PLEs) and critical information literacies (CILs) are two concepts that have been presented as responses to the challenges of the rich and complex information landscape. While both approaches support learners’ critical engagement with new information environments, each was developed within a different field. This paper connects and contrasts PLEs and CILs in order to explore the design of pedagogical responses to the information environment. Through a careful examination of PLE and CIL literature, the paper demonstrates that information literacy education intersects with the concepts and goals of PLEs. As such, the authors suggest that PLE scholarship informed by CIL scholarship, and vice versa, will yield a deeper understanding of modern learning contexts as well as a more holistic and responsive learner framework. The example of the research assignment will be used to demonstrate the viability of this approach. With these propositions, the authors invite educators, librarians and information technologists to engage in a dialogue about these concepts and the potential for pedagogical change. Keywords:  personal learning environments; information literacy; information landscape; self-directed learning Citation : Research in Learning Technology 2015,  23 : 21193 -  http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.21193

[1]  Sandra Schaffert,et al.  On the way towards Personal Learning Environments: Seven crucial aspects , 2008 .

[2]  T. Hooley.  The digital scholar: how technology is transforming scholarly practice , 2013 .

[3]  Graham Attwell,et al.  Personal Learning Environments - the future of eLearning? , 2007 .

[4]  Robert Anna Marie Detmering,et al.  "Research Papers Have Always Seemed Very Daunting": Information Literacy Narratives and the Student Research Experience , 2012 .

[5]  Ilona Buchem,et al.  Understanding Personal Learning Environments: Literature review and synthesis through the Activity Theory lens , 2011 .

[6]  Emma Coonan.  A New Curriculum for Information Literacy (ANCIL)- Teaching learning: perceptions of information literacy , 2011 .

[7]  Ross MacDonald,et al.  The New Digital Scholar: Exploring and Enriching the Research and Writing Practices of NextGen Students , 2014 .

[8]  Audrey J. Roth.  The Research Paper , 2022, Writing the Research Paper.

[9]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  The 3P Learning Model , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[10]  C. Pawley.  Information Literacy: A Contradictory Coupling , 2003, The Library Quarterly.

[11]  T. Swanson.  Applying a Critical Pedagogical Perspective to Information Literacy Standards , 2005 .

[12]  Heidi L. M. Jacobs.  Information Literacy and Reflective Pedagogical Praxis , 2008 .

[13]  George Siemens.  Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[14]  Sharon A. Weiner,et al.  The rescinding of the ACRL 2000 Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education—Really?? , 2017 .

[15]  Henry Jenkins.  Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[16]  David Wiley,et al.  Open for Learning: The CMS and the Open Learning Network , 2009 .

[17]  Christian Dalsgaard,et al.  Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems , 2006 .

[18]  J. Brown,et al.  Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0 , 2008 .

[19]  Barbara Fister.  Teaching the Rhetorical Dimensions of Research. , 1993 .

[20]  Bonnie Stewart,et al.  Massiveness + Openness = New Literacies of Participation? , 2013 .

[21]  K. Tuominen,et al.  Information Literacy as a Sociotechnical Practice1 , 2005, The Library Quarterly.

[22]  James Elmborg.  Critical Information Literacy: Definitions and Challenges , 2012 .

[23]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  The Three P's of Pedagogy for the Networked Society: Personalization, Participation, and Productivity. , 2008 .

[24]  Sharmila Pixy Ferris,et al.  The plugged-in professor : tips and techniques for teaching with social media , 2013 .

[25]  Jennie Nelson,et al.  This Was an Easy Assignment: Examining How Students Interpret Academic Writing Tasks , 1990 .

[26]  P. Bizzell,et al.  Research as a Social Act , 1987 .

[27]  Jennie Nelson.  This was an easy assignment , 1990 .

[28]  Royce Kimmons,et al.  Networked Participatory Scholarship: Emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online networks , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[29]  G. Veletsianos,et al.  Assumptions and challenges of open scholarship , 2012 .

[30]  D. Ward.  Revisioning Information Literacy for Lifelong Meaning , 2006 .

[31]  James K. Elmborg.  Information literacy and Writing across the curriculum: sharing the vision , 2003 .

[32]  R. Hall.  Revealing the transformatory moment of learning technology: the place of critical social theory , 2011 .

[33]  James Elmborg.  Critical Information Literacy: Implications for Instructional Practice , 2006 .

[34]  Wendy Jim Holliday,et al.  Talking About Information Literacy: The Mediating Role of Discourse in a College Writing Classroom , 2013 .

[35]  Scott Wilson,et al.  Towards a reference model for the personal learning environment , 2006 .

[36]  Troy A. Swanson,et al.  A Radical Step: Implementing A Critical Information Literacy Model , 2004 .

[37]  Annemaree Lloyd,et al.  Recasting information literacy as socio-cultural practice: implications for library and information science researchers , 2007, Inf. Res..

[38]  Martin Weller.  Using learning environments as a metaphor for educational change , 2009 .

[39]  Arthur Winzenried,et al.  Information Literacy Landscapes: Information Literacy in Education, Workplace and Everyday Contexts , 2011 .

[40]  Cushla Kapitzke,et al.  Literacies and libraries - Archives and cybraries , 1999 .

[41]  Mary Jane Petrowski,et al.  Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) , 2010 .

[42]  Cushla Kapitzke.  Information Literacy: A Review and Poststructural Critique , 2003 .

[43]  Gloria J. Leckie.  Desperately seeking citations: Uncovering faculty assumptions about the undergraduate research process , 1996 .

[44]  Patricia A Iannuzzi.  Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education , 2000 .

[45]  M. Accardi,et al.  Critical library instruction : theories and methods , 2010 .

[46]  Alison Hicks,et al.  Unraveling the research process: social bookmarking and collaborative learning , 2013 .

[47]  A. Lloyd.  Information Literacy Landscapes , 2010 .

[48]  Sanna Talja,et al.  Constituting “information” and “user” as research objects: a theory of knowledge formations as an alternative to the information man-theory , 1997 .

[49]  John H. Mott,et al.  Envisioning the Post-LMS Era: The Open Learning Network , 2010 .

[50]  Mark William Johnson,et al.  The Personal Learning Environment and the human condition: from theory to teaching practice , 2008, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[51]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Transforming Information Literacy Programs: Intersecting Frontiers of Self, Library Culture, and Campus Community , 2012 .

[52]  J. Nelson.  The Research Paper: A "Rhetoric of Doing" or a "Rhetoric of the Finished Word"?. , 1994 .

[53]  A. Lloyd.  Information Literacy Landscapes: Information Literacy in Education, Workplace and Everyday Contexts , 2010 .