Successful use of a pneumatic biventricular assist device as a bridge to transplantation in cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND Mechanical circulatory support is a highly effective technology to maintain organ perfusion in patients with cardiogenic shock as a bridge to transplantation. Although implantation of a left ventricular assist device alone is often the preferred configuration, patients with biventricular failure and significant end-organ dysfunction often require biventricular assistance. METHODS Between January 2000 and September 2008, 80 patients with severe biventricular failure were accepted for heart transplantation and received a pneumatic biventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplant. Patients were retrospectively divided into 2 groups: those successfully bridged to transplant (Group A) and those who died (Group B). Patients were also divided into 2 periods of implantation: Group X (2000-2005) and Group Y (2006-2008, which used a multidiscipline selection process). RESULTS Overall success rate to transplantation was 71.3%, with Group Y demonstrating an 82% success to transplant rate vs 63% in Group X. One-year actuarial survival after transplant was 89% compared with 92% in patients without a ventricular assist device. There were no statistically significant laboratory parameters between Groups A and B identifying potential risk factors for poor outcome. CONCLUSION Biventricular assist device therapy represents an effective and reliable means of supporting selected Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1 patients as a bridge to transplantation, with excellent success to transplant rates and post-transplant survival.

[1]  B. Griffith,et al.  Transplant candidate's clinical status rather than right ventricular function defines need for univentricular versus biventricular support. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  R. Kormos,et al.  Mechanical Circulatory Support Device Database of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: second annual report--2004. , 2004, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[3]  L. Stevenson,et al.  Third INTERMACS Annual Report: the evolution of destination therapy in the United States. , 2011, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[4]  F. Pagani,et al.  The right ventricular failure risk score a pre-operative tool for assessing the risk of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device candidates. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Karen Ulisney,et al.  INTERMACS profiles of advanced heart failure: the current picture. , 2009, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[6]  F. Pagani,et al.  Patient selection for left ventricular assist device therapy. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  F. Oliva,et al.  Determination of candidacy for mechanical circulatory support: importance of clinical indices. , 2000, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[8]  R. Körfer,et al.  Mechanical circulatory support: The Bad Oeynhausen experience , 1995 .

[9]  M C Oz,et al.  Implantable left ventricular assist devices. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  B. Coleman,et al.  Biventricular support in patients with profound cardiogenic shock: a single center experience. , 2002, ASAIO journal.

[11]  O H Frazier,et al.  Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  J. R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Risk score derived from pre-operative data analysis predicts the need for biventricular mechanical circulatory support. , 2008, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[13]  Nader Moazami,et al.  Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  S. Russell,et al.  Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  J. R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Early planned institution of biventricular mechanical circulatory support results in improved outcomes compared with delayed conversion of a left ventricular assist device to a biventricular assist device. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  Kiyotaka Fukamachi,et al.  Predictors of Severe Right Ventricular Failure After Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Device Insertion: Analysis of 245 Patients , 2002, Circulation.

[17]  宏行 津久井 Biventricular assist device utilization for patients with morbid congestive heart failure : a justifiable strategy , 2006 .

[18]  P M Portner,et al.  Mechanical Circulatory Support for Advanced Heart Failure: Effect of Patient Selection on Outcome , 2001, Circulation.

[19]  M. Deng,et al.  Mechanical Circulatory Support Device Database of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation , 2003, Current opinion in cardiology.

[20]  L. Gray,et al.  Preoperative and postoperative comparison of patients with univentricular and biventricular support with the thoratec ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. , 1997, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  Robert L. Kormos,et al.  Mechanical Circulatory Support device database of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: first annual report--2003. , 2003, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[22]  Robert L. Kormos,et al.  Biventricular Assist Device Utilization for Patients with Morbid Congestive Heart Failure: A Justifiable Strategy , 2005, Circulation.