Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive.

Some species introduced into new geographical areas from their native ranges wreak ecological and economic havoc in their new environment. Although many studies have searched for either species or habitat characteristics that predict invasiveness of exotic species, the match between characteristics of the invader and those of members of the existing native community may be essential to understanding invasiveness. Here, we find that one metric, the phylogenetic relatedness of an invader to the native community, provides a predictive tool for invasiveness. Using a phylogenetic supertree of all grass species in California, we show that highly invasive grass species are, on average, significantly less related to native grasses than are introduced but noninvasive grasses. The match between the invader and the existing native community may explain why exotic pest species are not uniformly noxious in all novel habitats. Relatedness of invaders to the native biota may be one useful criterion for prioritizing management efforts of exotic species.

[1]  M. Caldwell,et al.  Overlapping resource use in three Great Basin species: implications for community invasibility and vegetation dynamics , 2003 .

[2]  James C. Hickman,et al.  The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California , 1993 .

[3]  C. Caffrey,et al.  WEST NILE VIRUS DEVASTATES AN AMERICAN CROW POPULATION , 2005 .

[4]  M. Pagel,et al.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1991 .

[5]  J. Vivanco,et al.  Biogeographical variation in community response to root allelochemistry: novel weapons and exotic invasion , 2004 .

[6]  A. Ricciardi.  Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: is an "invasional meltdown" occurring in the Great Lakes? , 2001 .

[7]  Jeffrey A. Crooks,et al.  Characterizing ecosystem‐level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers , 2002 .

[8]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Factors that shape seed mass evolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Cynthia S. Brown,et al.  Community assembly and invasion: An experimental test of neutral versus niche processes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  R8s: Inferring Absolute Rates of Molecular Evolution, Divergence times in the Absence of a Molecular Clock , 2003, Bioinform..

[11]  Tim M. Blackburn,et al.  Lessons from the establishment of exotic species: a meta-analytical case study using birds , 2005 .

[12]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[13]  R. N. Mack,et al.  Humans as Global Plant Dispersers: Getting More Than We Bargained For , 2001 .

[14]  J. C. Hickman,et al.  The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California , 1993 .

[15]  C. Daehler.  Darwin's Naturalization Hypothesis Revisited , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[16]  D. Richardson,et al.  What attributes make some plant species more invasive , 1996 .

[17]  M. Sagoff.  Do Non-Native Species Threaten The Natural Environment? , 2005 .

[18]  F. Berendse,et al.  Diversity reduces invasibility in experimental plant communities the role of plant species , 2003 .

[19]  R. N. Mack.  Plant naturalizations and invasions in the Eastern United States: 1634-1860. , 2003 .

[20]  A. Ricciardi,et al.  Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems , 2004 .

[21]  D. Maddison,et al.  MacClade 4: analysis of phy-logeny and character evolution , 2003 .

[22]  Norway,et al.  Invasive species and biodiversity management , 1999 .

[23]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  NULL MODELS FOR THE NUMBER OF EVOLUTIONARY STEPS IN A CHARACTER ON A PHYLOGENETIC TREE , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  J. Vivanco,et al.  Natural selection for resistance to the allelopathic effects of invasive plants , 2005 .

[25]  R. Callaway,et al.  SOIL FUNGI ALTER INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE INVADER CENTAUREA MACULOSA AND NORTH AMERICAN NATIVES , 2004 .

[26]  R. Callaway,et al.  Root herbivores, pathogenic fungi, and competition between Centaurea maculosa and Festuca idahoensis , 2003, Plant Ecology.

[27]  R. Duncan,et al.  Ecology: Darwin's naturalization hypothesis challenged , 2002, Nature.

[28]  R. N. Mack.  Phylogenetic Constraint, Absent Life Forms, and Preadapted Alien Plants: A Prescription for Biological Invasions , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[29]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Exploring the Phylogenetic Structure of Ecological Communities: An Example for Rain Forest Trees , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[30]  C. Kolar,et al.  Ecological Predictions and Risk Assessment for Alien Fishes in North America , 2002, Science.

[31]  Alex C Rodriguez,et al.  Soil biota and exotic plant invasion , 2004, Nature.

[32]  Nicolas Salamin,et al.  Building supertrees: an empirical assessment using the grass family (Poaceae). , 2002, Systematic biology.

[33]  J. E. Byers,et al.  SCALE DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF BIOTIC RESISTANCE TO BIOLOGICAL INVASION , 2003 .

[34]  S. Anagnostakis,et al.  Chestnut blight: the classical problem of an introduced pathogen , 1987 .

[35]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  Phylogenetic Overdispersion in Floridian Oak Communities , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[36]  J. Lawton,et al.  INSECTS ON PLANTS. COMMUNITY PATTERNS AND MECHANISMS. , 1987 .

[37]  Robert Ornduff,et al.  Terrestrial Vegetation of California. , 1977 .

[38]  D. Penny.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1992 .

[39]  T. Runge,et al.  Smallpox and the Native American , 2002, The American journal of the medical sciences.