The young Van Dyck’s fingerprint: a technical approach to assess the authenticity of a disputed painting

The painting Saint Jerome, part of the collection of the Maagdenhuis Museum (Antwerp, Belgium), is attributed to the young Anthony van Dyck (1613–1621) with reservations. The painting displays remarkable compositional and iconographic similarities with two early Van Dyck works (1618–1620) now in Museum Boijmans van Beuningen (Rotterdam) and Nationalmuseum (Stockholm). Despite these similarities, previous art historical research did not result in a clear attribution to this master. In this study, the work’s authenticity as a young Van Dyck painting was assessed from a technical perspective by employing a twofold approach. First, technical information on Van Dyck’s materials and techniques, here identified as his fingerprint, were defined based on a literature review. Second, the materials and techniques of the questioned Saint Jerome painting were characterized by using complementary imaging techniques: infrared reflectography, X-ray radiography and macro X-ray fluorescence scanning. The insights from this non-invasive research were supplemented with analysis of a limited number of cross-sections by means of field emission scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The results demonstrated that the questioned painting’s materials and techniques deviate from Van Dyck’s fingerprint, thus making the authorship of this master very unlikely.

[1]  Koen Janssens,et al.  Strategies for processing mega-pixel X-ray fluorescence hyperspectral data: a case study on a version of Caravaggio's painting Supper at Emmaus , 2015 .

[2]  Nam-Hun Kim,et al.  Morphological characteristics of Quercusvariabilis charcoal prepared at different temperatures , 2006, Wood Science and Technology.

[3]  The Technology of Red Lake Pigment Manufacture : Study of the Dyestuff Substrate , 2022 .

[4]  Maryan Wynn Ainsworth Art and autoradiography: Insights into the genesis of paintings by Rembrandt, Van Dyck, and Vermeer , 1982 .

[5]  Margaret Roland,et al.  The young van Dyck , 1980 .

[6]  Dominique Verloo echnique picturale et traitement , 2001 .

[7]  M. Davidson,et al.  [Optical microscopy]. , 2018, Microscopica acta.

[8]  M. Faries,et al.  Reshaping the Field: the Contribution of Technical Studies , 2002 .

[9]  Maryan Wynn Ainsworth What’s in a Name? The Question of Attribution in Early Netherlandish Painting , 2003 .

[10]  Livia Depuydt-Elbaum,et al.  Antoine Van Dyck (1599-1641(, Golgotha, 1630, Gand, église Saint Michel , 1999 .

[11]  Maryan W. Ainsworth,et al.  From Connoisseurship to Technical Art History: The Evolution of the Interdisciplinary Study of Art , 2013 .

[12]  Claire Barry,et al.  Seeing Through Renaissance and Baroque Paintings , 2013 .

[13]  Susan J. Barnes,et al.  Van Dyck: A Complete Catalogue of the Paintings , 2003 .

[14]  David Saunders,et al.  A New Camera for High-Resolution Infrared Imaging of Works of Art , 2006 .

[15]  Erma Hermens European paintings 15th-18th century : copying, replicating and emulating , 2014 .

[16]  E. Hermens European Paintings 15th-18th Century: Copying, Emulating and Replicating , 2014 .

[17]  Friso Lammertse,et al.  Masterpiece or Copy? Two Versions of Anthony Van Dyck's St. Jerome with an Angel , 2010 .