Audit quality and the going-concern decision-making process: Spanish evidence

In this study, we attempt empirically to investigate the relationship between audit quality and the probability that a financially distressed company would receive a going-concern opinion. Auditor decision-making in the presence of going-concern uncertainties may be characterized as a two-stage process. The first stage is the identification of a potential going-concern problem and the second stage is to determine whether the particular company should receive a qualified going-concern opinion. A sample of 1,199 non-financial Spanish company-years has been obtained from the database issued by the Stock Exchange National Commission for the fiscal years ending between December 1991 and December 2000. The results indicate that audit quality (measured by the auditor's level of independence and knowledge) affects the probability that a financially distressed company would receive a going-concern opinion. This probability is influenced not only by the auditor's ability to detect financial uncertainties, but also by the auditor's decision-making as to what type of opinion should be finally issued.

[1]  Joseph V. Carcello,et al.  Auditor Litigation and Modified Reporting on Bankrupt Clients , 1994 .

[2]  Luis Angel Castrillo Lara,et al.  La independencia de los auditores: un nuevo enfoque , 1999 .

[3]  C. Zavgren,et al.  The prediction of corporate failure: The state of the art , 1983 .

[4]  Paul Danos,et al.  Audit Industry Dynamics: Factors Affecting Changes in Client-Industry Market Shares , 1982 .

[5]  Larry N. Killough,et al.  The USE OF MULTIPLE DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS IN THE ASSESSMENT OF THE GOING-CONCERN STATUS OF AN AUDIT CLIENT , 1990 .

[6]  Jere R. Francis,et al.  Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism , 1999 .

[7]  M. Zmijewski.  METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES RELATED TO THE ESTIMATION OF FINANCIAL DISTRESS PREDICTION MODELS , 1984 .

[8]  Paul Barnes,et al.  THE AUDITOR'S GOING CONCERN DECISION: SOME UK EVIDENCE CONCERNING INDEPENDENCE AND COMPETENCE , 1993 .

[9]  F Jones,et al.  CURRENT TECHNIQUES IN BANKRUPTCY PREDICTION , 1987 .

[10]  Timothy J. Louwers.  The relation between going-concern opinions and the auditor's loss function , 1998 .

[11]  Joseph V. Carcello,et al.  Audit Committee Composition and Auditor Reporting , 2000 .

[12]  Zoe-Vonna Palmrose.  AUDIT FEES AND AUDITOR SIZE - FURTHER EVIDENCE , 1986 .

[13]  Jayanth K. Krishnan,et al.  The Role of Economic Trade-Offs in the Audit Opinion Decision: An Empirical Analysis , 1996 .

[14]  Emiliano Ruiz Barbadillo,et al.  Análisis de la estructura del mercado de servicios de auditoria en España , 1998 .

[15]  Kenneth B. Schwartz,et al.  An empirical investigation of audit qualification decisions in the presence of going concern uncertainties , 1987 .

[16]  Jack E. Wilkerson,et al.  Selecting Experimental And Comparison Samples For Use In Studies Of Auditor Reporting Decisions , 1987 .

[17]  J. Kenneth Reynolds,et al.  Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions , 2000 .

[18]  Earl R. Wilson,et al.  The Incremental Information Content of the Going-Concern Audit Opinion , 1994 .

[19]  T. B. O'keefe,et al.  The Production of Audit Services: Evidence from a Major Public Accounting Firm , 1994 .

[20]  Dan A. Simunic,et al.  Product Differentiation in Auditing: Auditor Choice in the Market for Unseasoned New Issues , 1987 .

[21]  D. Simunic.  The Pricing Of Audit Services - Theory And Evidence , 1980 .

[22]  Paul L. Walker,et al.  The international debate over mandatory auditor rotation: a conceptual research framework , 1999 .

[23]  M. García-Benau,et al.  Beyond the audit expectations gap , 1992 .

[24]  P. Bougen.  Spain, July 1988: Some observations on becoming professional , 1997 .

[25]  Frederick L. Jones.  The information content of the auditor's going concern evaluation☆ , 1996 .

[26]  Bryan K. Church,et al.  Default on Debt Obligations and the Issuance of Going-concern Opinions , 1992 .

[27]  R. Martin.  Going-concern uncertainty disclosures and conditions: a comparison of French, German, and U.S. practices , 2000 .

[28]  C. Humphrey,et al.  Auditors versus third parties and others: the unusual case of the Spanish audit liability “crisis” , 2000 .

[29]  L. DeAngelo,et al.  Auditor size and audit quality , 1981 .

[30]  C. Lennox.  The Accuracy and Incremental Information Content of Audit Reports in Predicting Bankruptcy , 1999 .

[31]  A. Vanstraelen.  Auditor economic incentives and going-concern opinions in a limited litigious Continental European business environment: empirical evidence from Belgium , 2002 .

[32]  J. Krishnan,et al.  Auditor switching and conservatism , 1994 .

[33]  Joseph V. Carcello,et al.  The Effect of SAS No. 59: How Treatment of the Transition Period Influences Results , 1997 .

[34]  María Antonia García Benau,et al.  La calidad del servicio de auditoría: los auditores vistos por sus "clientes" , 1999 .

[35]  Dana R. Hermanson,et al.  Temporal Changes in Bankruptcy-Related Reporting , 1995 .

[36]  W. Hopwood,et al.  A Reexamination of Auditor versus Model Accuracy within the Context of the Going-Concern Opinion Decision* , 1994 .

[37]  W. Johnson,et al.  The market for audit services: Evidence from voluntary auditor changes , 1990 .

[38]  M. I. B. Bravo,et al.  La situación de la auditoría en España desde la perspectiva de los auditores , 1995 .

[39]  H. Koh.  Model Predictions and Auditor Assessments of Going Concern Status , 1991 .

[40]  Thomas Kida.  AN INVESTIGATION INTO AUDITORS CONTINUITY AND RELATED QUALIFICATION JUDGMENTS , 1980 .

[41]  Laurence R. Paquette,et al.  Using a bankruptcy model in the auditing course: The evaluation of a company as a going concern , 1996 .

[42]  Jayanth K. Krishnan,et al.  Litigation Risk and Auditor Resignations , 1997 .

[43]  Teija Laitinen,et al.  Comparative analysis of failure prediction methods: the Finnish case , 1999 .

[44]  C. Humphrey,et al.  Success in failure? Reflections on the changing Spanish audit environment , 1999 .

[45]  Kannan Raghunandan,et al.  Auditor Tenure and Audit Reporting Failures , 2002 .

[46]  Jane F. Mutchler,et al.  A MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF THE AUDITORS GOING-CONCERN OPINION DECISION , 1985 .

[47]  Philip D. Bougen David.  Debating Spanish audit legislation: the audit law of 1988 , 1997 .

[48]  Ross L. Watts,et al.  Positive Accounting Theory , 2006 .

[49]  Nieves Gómez-Aguilar,et al.  Do Spanish Firms Change Auditor to Avoid a Qualified Audit Report , 2003 .

[50]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  Do Non-audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going-concern Audit Opinions , 2002 .

[51]  Stephen L Taylor,et al.  Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations , 1995 .

[52]  José Antonio Gonzalo Angulo.  La auditoría, una profesión en la encrucijada de los noventa , 1995 .