Patient Vertical Centering and Correlation with Radiation Output in Adult Abdominopelvic CT

The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a significant effect, independent of patient size, of patient vertical centering on the current-modulated CT scanner radiation output in adult abdominopelvic CT. A phantom was used to evaluate calculation of vertical positioning and effective diameter at five different table heights. In addition, 656 consecutive contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic scans using the same protocol and automatic tube current modulation settings on a Philips Brilliance 64 MDCT scanner were retrospectively evaluated. The vertical position of the patient center of mass and the average effective diameter of the scanned patient were computed using the reconstructed images. The average volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) for each scan was recorded. The mean patient center of mass y coordinate ranged from −3.7 to 6.7 cm (mean ± SD, 2.8 ± 1.2 cm), indicating that patients were on average positioned slightly below the scanner isocenter. There was a slight tendency for smaller patients to be mis-centered lower than larger patients. Average CTDIvol closely fit a quadratic regression curve with respect to mean effective diameter. However, the value of the regression coefficient relating CTDIvol to the patient’s vertical position was nearly zero, indicating only a very slight increase in CTDIvol with patient mis-centering for the scanner used in this study. The techniques used here may be useful both for automated evaluation of proper patient positioning in CT and for estimating the radiation dose effects of patient mis-centering for any CT scanner.

[1]  Thomas Toth,et al.  The influence of patient centering on CT dose and image noise. , 2007, Medical physics.

[2]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Automatic patient centering for MDCT: effect on radiation dose. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Katsuhiro Ichikawa,et al.  Misoperation of CT automatic tube current modulation systems with inappropriate patient centering: phantom studies. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  J. Boone,et al.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. , 2011, Radiology.

[5]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[6]  Phillip M. Cheng,et al.  Automated Estimation of Abdominal Effective Diameter for Body Size Normalization of CT Dose , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[7]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Impact of miscentering on patient dose and image noise in x-ray CT imaging: phantom and clinical studies. , 2012, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[8]  Mika Kortesniemi,et al.  Effect of vertical positioning on organ dose, image noise and contrast in pediatric chest CT—phantom study , 2013, Pediatric Radiology.

[9]  Xiangyang Tang,et al.  Variability of MDCT dose due to technologist performance: impact of posteroanterior versus anteroposterior localizer image and table height with use of automated tube current modulation. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Mika Kortesniemi,et al.  Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Keith J Strauss,et al.  Toward Large-Scale Process Control to Enable Consistent CT Radiation Dose Optimization. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.