An organizational model to improve the robotic system among general surgeons.

INTRODUCTION Robotic surgery has gained wide acceptance in recent years. However its development is slower and the lack of high level experience with this technique is an important limitation. This manuscript discusses some of the reasons of it and aims to describe the organizational system we have progressively established in our center in order to improve the development of Robotic program in our surgical area. METHODS Some points may be required to improve the robotic program development in a general surgical department, including: a broad availability of robotic system in a surgical area; an ideal setting area with mainly oncological and hepato-biliary-pancreatic disease; the need of a mainly young team; a broad application of the robotic system in more general surgical fields; a high motivation on robotic use; a departmental and institutional economical effort. We have tried to achieve these goals before starting the robotic program in our department at October 2010. RESULTS From October 2010 until November 2013 a total of 170 procedures have been performed, 92% of them for malignant diseases. Conversion rate and overall morbidity was 5% and 19%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The organizational model defined in our center is facilitating the constant and progressive development of the robotic program. A broad and flexible availability of the robotic system, a progressive increase of young surgeons joining this technology as well as the institutional and departmental economical effort are the points with which the robotic system may increase its development in a surgical department.

[1]  M. Salman,et al.  Use, Cost, Complications, and Mortality of Robotic versus Nonrobotic General Surgery Procedures Based on a Nationwide Database , 2013, The American surgeon.

[2]  Computer-enhanced surgical systems ("robotic surgery"). , 2002, Issues in emerging health technologies.

[3]  L. Milone,et al.  State of the Art in Robotic Hepatobiliary Surgery , 2013, World Journal of Surgery.

[4]  L. Nifong,et al.  Robotics in Cardiac Surgery: Past, Present, and Future , 2013, Rambam Maimonides medical journal.

[5]  Subhasis Giri,et al.  Current Status of Robotic Surgery , 2012, Indian Journal of Surgery.

[6]  W. Wahl,et al.  Improved perioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations. , 2014, American journal of surgery.

[7]  A. Advincula,et al.  The role of robotic surgery in gynecology , 2007, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[8]  M. Hashizume,et al.  Robotic Surgery for Cancer , 2013, Cancer journal.

[9]  M. Ismail,et al.  [Application of the da Vinci robotic system in thoracic surgery]. , 2013, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[10]  Ralph J Damiano,et al.  Optimizing motion scaling and magnification in robotic surgery. , 2004, Surgery.

[11]  S. Horgan,et al.  Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[12]  D. Bartlett,et al.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Matched Comparison , 2014, Annals of surgery.

[13]  Tianjiao Chu,et al.  Dual-console robotic surgery: a new teaching paradigm , 2012, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[14]  Dimitrios Stefanidis,et al.  The first nationwide evaluation of robotic general surgery: a regionalized, small but safe start , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[15]  L. Casciola,et al.  Robot assistance in liver surgery: a real advantage over a fully laparoscopic approach? Results of a comparative bi‐institutional analysis , 2013, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.