Sources of variability in human communicative skills

When established communication systems cannot be used, people rapidly create novel systems to modify the mental state of another agent according to their intentions. However, there are dramatic inter-individual differences in the implementation of this human competence for communicative innovation. Here we characterize psychological sources of inter-individual variability in the ability to build a shared communication system from scratch. We consider two potential sources of variability in communicative skills. Cognitive traits of two individuals could independently influence their joint ability to establish a communication system. Another possibility is that the overlap between those individual traits influences the communicative performance of a dyad. We assess these possibilities by quantifying the relationship between cognitive traits and behavior of communicating dyads. Cognitive traits were assessed with psychometric scores quantifying cooperative attitudes and fluid intelligence. Competence for implementing successful communicative innovations was assessed by using a non-verbal communicative task. Individual capacities influence communicative success when communicative innovations are generated. Dyadic similarities and individual traits modulate the type of communicative strategy chosen. The ability to establish novel communicative actions was influenced by a combination of the communicator's ability to understand intentions and the addressee's ability to recognize patterns. Communicative pairs with comparable systemizing abilities or behavioral inhibition were more likely to explore the search space of possible communicative strategies by systematically adding new communicative behaviors to those already available. No individual psychometric measure seemed predominantly responsible for communicative success. These findings support the notion that the human ability for fast communicative innovations represents a special type of complex collaborative activity.

[1]  付伶俐.  打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[2]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  M. Tomasello.  Origins of human communication , 2008 .

[4]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Communicating without a functioning language system: Implications for the role of language in mentalizing , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Exploring the cognitive infrastructure of communication , 2012 .

[6]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .

[7]  G. Palomaki,et al.  Sources of Variability , 2009 .

[8]  N. Goldenfeld,et al.  Predicting Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) from the Systemizing Quotient-Revised (SQ-R) and Empathy Quotient (EQ) , 2006, Brain Research.

[9]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  S. Levinson.  Interactional biases in human thinking , 1995 .

[11]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Recipient design in tacit communication , 2009, Cognition.

[12]  Andy Gardner,et al.  How do communication systems emerge? , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Empathy Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences , 2004, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[14]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[15]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Neural Correlates of Intentional Communication , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[16]  J. Raven.  The Raven's Progressive Matrices: Change and Stability over Culture and Time , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Danger and Fear Control in Response to Fear Appeals: The Role of Need for Cognition , 2004 .

[18]  C. Carver,et al.  Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales , 1994 .

[19]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[21]  Sotaro Kita,et al.  Response to Comment on "Children Creating Core Properties of Language: Evidence from an Emerging Sign Language in Nicaragua" , 2005, Science.

[22]  Johan Kwisthout,et al.  Intentional Communication: Computationally Easy or Difficult? , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[23]  Mark H. Davis,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy , 1980 .

[24]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Hearers and speech acts , 1982 .

[25]  Mark Blokpoel,et al.  Recipient design in human communication: simple heuristics or perspective taking? , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[26]  J. Kirby,et al.  Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university students. , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[27]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  On the human ‘interactional engine’ , 2006 .

[28]  Reinhard Selten,et al.  The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  M A Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1990 What one intelligence test measures : A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test , 2016 .

[30]  C. Padden,et al.  The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  L. Steels.  Experiments on the emergence of human communication , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  G. Ritchie,et al.  Signalling signalhood and the emergence of communication , 2008, Cognition.

[33]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: tolerance constraints on cooperation , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Humans Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis , 2007, Science.

[35]  Susan Goldin.  The resilience of language : what gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language , 2003 .

[36]  Eva Cools,et al.  Development and Validation of the Cognitive Style Indicator , 2007, The Journal of psychology.

[37]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Interpersonal Synergies , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[38]  Bruno Galantucci,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Emergence of Human Communication Systems , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .

[40]  S. Levinson,et al.  Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[41]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.