Analysis of Wall–flame Interaction in Laminar Non-premixed Combustion

ABSTRACT The study is aimed at demonstrating a methodology for the time-scale characterization of the chemistry-wall-heat-transfer interaction. The driving chemical time-scale is estimated by means of the tangential stretching rate, and a proper thermal timescale for the temperature-time variation due to wall heat flux is presented. A thermal Damköhler number, Dath , is proposed as the ratio of the two. The methodology is applied on a prototypical laminar methane-oxygen diffusion flame impinging on an isothermal cold wall. Non-adiabatic effects are described qualitatively and a CSP-TSR analysis is performed to obtain topological information and physical insights. The thermal Damköhler number field is computed and discussed to highlight the interplay between chemical and diffusive processes and to a-priori assess the accuracy of the steady laminar flamelet assumption under non-adiabatic conditions.

[1]  H. Najm,et al.  Reactive and reactive-diffusive time scales in stiff reaction-diffusion systems , 2005 .

[2]  J. Zips,et al.  Non-Adiabatic Tabulation Methods to predict Wall-Heat Loads in Rocket Combustion , 2017 .

[3]  Mauro Valorani,et al.  Dynamical system analysis of ignition phenomena using the Tangential Stretching Rate concept , 2015 .

[4]  Mauro Valorani,et al.  Tangential stretching rate (TSR) analysis of non premixed reactive flows , 2017 .

[5]  S. Lam,et al.  The CSP method for simplifying kinetics , 1994 .

[6]  Tiziano Faravelli,et al.  A computational tool for the detailed kinetic modeling of laminar flames: Application to C2H4/CH4 coflow flames , 2013 .

[7]  M. Ihme,et al.  Nonadiabatic Flamelet Formulation for Predicting Wall Heat Transfer in Rocket Engines , 2018, AIAA Journal.

[8]  Mauro Valorani,et al.  CSP-based chemical kinetics mechanisms simplification strategy for non-premixed combustion: An application to hybrid rocket propulsion , 2017 .

[9]  Dimitris M. Manias,et al.  Investigation of the turbulent flame structure and topology at different Karlovitz numbers using the tangential stretching rate index , 2019, Combustion and Flame.

[10]  Robert W. Bilger,et al.  Conditional moment closure for turbulent reacting flow , 1993 .

[11]  Mauro Valorani,et al.  Entropy production and timescales , 2017 .

[12]  Tiziano Faravelli,et al.  OpenSMOKE++: An object-oriented framework for the numerical modeling of reactive systems with detailed kinetic mechanisms , 2015, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[13]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  An automatic procedure for the simplification of chemical kinetic mechanisms based on CSP , 2006 .

[14]  H. Pitsch Unsteady Flamelet Modeling of Differential Diffusion in Turbulent Jet Diffusion Flames , 2000 .

[15]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  Skeletal mechanism generation with CSP and validation for premixed n-heptane flames , 2009 .

[16]  S. H. Lam,et al.  Understanding complex chemical kinetics with computational singular perturbation , 1989 .

[17]  Mauro Valorani,et al.  Automated chemical kinetic mechanism simplification with minimal user expertise , 2018, Combustion and Flame.

[18]  D. Lentini,et al.  Radiation Modelling in Non-Luminous Nonpremixed Turbulent Flames , 1997 .

[19]  Mauro Valorani,et al.  Analysis of Hydrogen/Air Turbulent Premixed Flames at Different Karlovitz Numbers Using Computational Singular Perturbation , 2018 .

[20]  E. Martelli,et al.  Numerical analysis of laser-pulse transient ignition of oxygen/methane mixtures in rocket-like combustion chamber , 2019, Acta Astronautica.

[21]  Mauro Valorani,et al.  Enhancements of the G-Scheme Framework , 2018, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion.