In Vitro Evaluation of Gastric Acid and Toothbrushing Effect on the Surface State of Different Types of Composite Resins

Background and Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of gastric acid associated with the effect of toothbrushing on the surface roughness of different types of composite resin used for direct restorations. Materials and Methods: The materials used in this study were two microhybrid (Filtek Z250, Herculite XRV) and two nanohybrid (Filtek Z550, Herculite XRV Ultra) composite resins. Two hundred and forty cylindrical samples with a height of 2 mm and a diameter of 6 mm were divided into four groups (groups A, B, C and D) corresponding to each tested material (n = 60). Each group was divided in two subgroups: subgroup I—the samples were submersed in hydrochloric acid and immediately submitted to toothbrushing; subgroup II—the samples were submitted only to toothbrushing. The simulation of the acid attack was performed by immersing the samples in a 0.01 M hydrochloric acid solution for 90 min. This procedure was followed immediately by toothbrushing simulation with 10,000 cycles. The acid attack and toothbrushing simulation were performed for two times. The surface roughness evaluation was performed with a Proscan 2100 profilometer. Repeated Measures ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used to perform the statistical analysis. Results: Simulation of one year of toothbrushing associated or not to hydrochloric acid exposure increases the surface roughness of microhybrid and nanohybrid composite resins. Six months of toothbrushing associated to six months of hydrochloric acid exposure increase the surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resins. Conclusions: Microhybrid composite resins surface becomes rougher after toothbrush and acid submersion when comparing to nanohybrid composite resins.

[1]  A. Murariu,et al.  An Interdisciplinary Study Regarding the Characteristics of Dental Resins Used for Temporary Bridges , 2022, Medicina.

[2]  I. Nica,et al.  Evaluation of the Surface Roughness of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins after Submission to Acidic and Abrasive Aggressions , 2022, Biomedicines.

[3]  S. Gurlui,et al.  The Influence of Abrasive and Acidic Aggressions on the Surface Condition of Flowable Composite Resin , 2022, Materials.

[4]  G. Ambrosano,et al.  Impact of dietary acids on the surface roughness and morphology of composite resins. , 2020, Journal of oral science.

[5]  E. Alagha,et al.  Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Techniques on Surface Roughness of Two Universal Nanohybrid Composite Resins , 2020 .

[6]  P. Gul,et al.  An evaluation of surface roughness after staining of different composite resins using atomic force microscopy and a profilometer , 2020, Microscopy research and technique.

[7]  S. L. Santiago,et al.  The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic acids on nanofilled and bulk fill resin composites: Roughness, surface hardness, and scanning electron microscopy analysis , 2019, Microscopy research and technique.

[8]  M. Giannini,et al.  Surface roughness and filler particles characterization of resin‐based composites , 2019, Microscopy research and technique.

[9]  M. Vargas,et al.  Influence of Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of Composite Resins: Polishability of Composite Resins. , 2019, Operative dentistry.

[10]  Tainá Franco,et al.  Surface degradation of composite resins under staining and brushing challenges , 2018, Journal of dental sciences.

[11]  Marco Colombo,et al.  Effect of different finishing/polishing procedures on surface roughness of Ormocer-based and different resin composites , 2018, Dental research journal.

[12]  B. Borges,et al.  Effect of additional polishing methods on the physical surface properties of different nanocomposites: SEM and AFM study , 2018, Microscopy research and technique.

[13]  M. Unal,et al.  The Evaluation of Color and Surface Roughness Changes in Resin based Restorative Materials with Different Contents After Waiting in Various Liquids: An SEM and AFM study , 2018, Microscopy research and technique.

[14]  A. Georgescu,et al.  Study Regarding the Surface State of Composite Resins After Finishing and Polishing Using Different Systems , 2017 .

[15]  S. S. Iyer,et al.  Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials , 2017, Dental research journal.

[16]  E. Herda,et al.  The effect of brushing with toothpaste containing nano calcium carbonate upon nanofill composite resin surface roughness , 2017 .

[17]  B. Irawan,et al.  The effect of toothbrush bristle stiffness on nanohybrid surface roughness , 2017 .

[18]  Dudi Aripin,et al.  Comparison of surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin polished by aluminum oxide and diamond particle paste , 2017 .

[19]  P. Nica,et al.  Surface roughness after finishing and polishing of a restorative nanocomposite material , 2017, 2017 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB).

[20]  D. Maharani,et al.  Efficacy of Toothpaste Containing Nano Calcium in Dentin Remineralization , 2015 .

[21]  L. Bohner,et al.  Surface roughness of composite resins subjected to hydrochloric acid. , 2015, Brazilian dental journal.

[22]  L. Rusu,et al.  Effects of Hydrochloric Acid on Enamel Adjacent to Composite Restorations –an in vitro Study , 2015 .

[23]  A. Cavalcanti,et al.  Association between Dental Erosion and Diet in Brazilian Adolescents Aged from 15 to 19: A Population-Based Study , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[24]  N. Fawad EFFECT OF DIFFERENT POLISHING PROCEDURES ON COLOR STABILITY OF NANOCOMPOSITES IN DIFFERENT MOUTH RINSES , 2013 .

[25]  Ali H. Al-Khafaji,et al.  The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness of new low polymerized composite materials (An in vitro study) , 2013 .

[26]  R. Hickel,et al.  Surface characterization of current composites after toothbrush abrasion. , 2013, Dental materials journal.

[27]  T. Attin,et al.  THE EFFECT OF FINISHING AND POLISHING SYSTEMS ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS, MICROHARDNESS AND MICROLEAKAGE OF A NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE , 2012 .

[28]  P. Hardigan,et al.  Effect of resealing on microleakage of resin composite restorations in relationship to margin design and composite type , 2012, European journal of dentistry.

[29]  F. Giessibl,et al.  Influence of surface properties of resin-based composites on in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm development. , 2012, European journal of oral sciences.

[30]  Linda Wang,et al.  Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after simulated toothbrushing , 2012, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[31]  D. P. Jacomassi,et al.  The filler content of the dental composite resins and their influence on different properties , 2012, Microscopy research and technique.

[32]  A. Catirse,et al.  The influence of mouthrinses and simulated toothbrushing on the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin. , 2012, Brazilian oral research.

[33]  L. Correr-Sobrinho,et al.  In vitro long-term degradation of aesthetic restorative materials in food-simulating media , 2012, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[34]  E. Mahmoud,et al.  Effect of Simulated Gastric Juice on Surface Characteristics of Direct Esthetic Restorations , 2012 .

[35]  E. Bronkhorst,et al.  12-year Survival of Composite vs. Amalgam Restorations , 2010, Journal of dental research.

[36]  T. Attin,et al.  Erosion and abrasion of tooth-colored restorative materials and human enamel. , 2009, Journal of dentistry.

[37]  G. Ergun,et al.  The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials. , 2007, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[38]  J. Devaux,et al.  Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[39]  E. Yıldız,et al.  Abrasive effect of brushing on ormocers following acid conditioning. , 2003, Dental materials journal.

[40]  R. Bowen Use of Epoxy Resins in Restorative Materials , 1956, Journal of dental research.