Design of a multifiber light delivery system for photoacoustic-guided surgery

Abstract. This work explores light delivery optimization for photoacoustic-guided minimally invasive surgeries, such as the endonasal transsphenoidal approach. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to study three-dimensional light propagation in tissue, comprising one or two 4-mm diameter arteries located 3 mm below bone, an absorbing metallic drill contacting the bone surface, and a single light source placed next to the 2.4-mm diameter drill shaft with a 2.9-mm diameter spherical drill tip. The optimal fiber distance from the drill shaft was determined from the maximum normalized fluence to the underlying artery. Using this optimal fiber-to-drill shaft distance, Zemax simulations were employed to propagate Gaussian beams through one or more 600 micron-core diameter optical fibers for detection on the bone surface. When the number of equally spaced fibers surrounding the drill increased, a single merged optical profile formed with seven or more fibers, determined by thresholding the resulting light profile images at 1/e times the maximum intensity. We used these simulations to inform design requirements, build a one to seven multifiber light delivery prototype to surround a surgical drill, and demonstrate its ability to simultaneously visualize the tool tip and blood vessel targets in the absence and presence of bone. The results and methodology are generalizable to multiple interventional photoacoustic applications.

[1]  Anastasia K. Ostrowski,et al.  Localization of Transcranial Targets for Photoacoustic-Guided Endonasal Surgeries , 2015, Photoacoustics.

[2]  Hideki Takegoshi,et al.  An anatomic study of the horizontal petrous internal carotid artery: sex and age differences. , 2007, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[3]  Steven L. Jacques,et al.  Coupling 3D Monte Carlo light transport in optically heterogeneous tissues to photoacoustic signal generation , 2014, Photoacoustics.

[4]  Qifa Zhou,et al.  Evaluation of breast tumor margins in vivo with intraoperative photoacoustic imaging. , 2012, Optics express.

[5]  J. Mari,et al.  Interventional multispectral photoacoustic imaging with a clinical ultrasound probe for discriminating nerves and tendons: an ex vivo pilot study. , 2015, Journal of biomedical optics.

[6]  Wiendelt Steenbergen,et al.  Photoacoustic needle: minimally invasive guidance to biopsy , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[7]  Stanislav Y. Emelianov,et al.  Development of a catheter for combined intravascular ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[8]  Jin U. Kang,et al.  In vivo visualization of prostate brachytherapy seeds with photoacoustic imaging , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[9]  Muyinatu A. Lediju Bell,et al.  Experimental assessment of energy requirements and tool tip visibility for photoacoustic-guided endonasal surgery , 2016, SPIE BiOS.

[10]  Scott E Kasner,et al.  Carotid Artery Diameter in Men and Women and the Relation to Body and Neck Size , 2006, Stroke.

[11]  Muyinatu A. Lediju Bell,et al.  Accuracy of a novel photoacoustic-based approach to surgical guidance performed with and without a da Vinci robot , 2017, BiOS.

[12]  Jin U Kang,et al.  Direct three-dimensional ultrasound-to-video registration using photoacoustic markers , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[13]  Nawaid Usmani,et al.  Integrated transrectal probe for translational ultrasound-photoacoustic imaging , 2016, SPIE BiOS.

[14]  Muyinatu A. Lediju Bell,et al.  Quantifying bone thickness, light transmission, and contrast interrelationships in transcranial photoacoustic imaging , 2015, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[15]  P. Kumavor,et al.  Co‐registered pulse‐echo/photoacoustic transvaginal probe for real time imaging of ovarian tissue , 2013, Journal of biophotonics.